METHOD, ARRANGEMENT AND USER INTERFACE FOR PRESENTING DATA DESCRIBING FOREST WORK UNIT OPERATION

• US 20170245444A1
• Filed: 08/26/2015
• Published: 08/31/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 08/27/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Ponsse Oyj
• Original Assignee: Ponsse Oyj
• Inventors: SAVUOJA, Jani, RANTA, Niko, HILJANEN, Jarmo
• Granted Patent: US 10,517,234 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• CPC Class Codes: A01G 23/00 Forestry
• CPC Class Codes: A01G 23/003 Collecting felled trees
• CPC Class Codes: A01G 23/093 Combinations of shearing, sawing or milling apparatus specially adapted for felling trees
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 15/02 electric
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 5/08 Registering or indicating performance data other than driving, working, idle, or waiting time, with or without registering driving, working, idle or waiting time
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 5/12 in graphical form
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 9/00 Simulators for teaching or training purposes for the use of weapons F41; computing aspects G06; protocols for games, networked simulations or virtual reality H04L67/131

Abstract

A solution for presenting information describing an operation of a forest work unit includes identifying a change affecting the operation of the forest work unit and storing information relating to the change, determining at least one key indicator describing the operation of the forest work unit, and presenting the key indicator describing the operation of the forest work unit and the changes taking place during a monitoring period.

Claims

1-29. -29. (canceled)

30. A method for optimizing an operation of a forest work unit, the method comprising at least the following steps:

determining in a processor at least one key indicator describing the operation of the forest work unit through a measurement of the operation of the forest work unit, the at least one key indicator being representative of efficiency or productivity of the forest work unit in relation to a specific forest work task;

determining a change affecting the operation of the forest work unit and having an influence on a value or a trend of the at least one key indicator;

storing information about the change into a memory, the information comprising at least a point of the change in relation to a cumulative variable;

presenting in a user interface the key indicator describing the operation of the forest work unit relating to a monitoring period, and the change along with the information about the change according to occurrence of the change relating to the monitoring period, the change along with the information about the change being presented in a way correlating to the at least one key indicator presented in the user interface; and

adjusting the operation of the forest work unit for guiding the at least one key indicator towards a desired value according to the correlation between the at least one key indicator and the change presented in the user interface, thereby optimizing the operation of the forest work unit,

wherein the change comprises at least one of the following;

a change relating to the work site, a change relating to working conditions, a change in settings, servicing, repair or maintenance operation carried out on the forest work unit or a part thereof, a change in working method and a change in a key indicator to be monitored when achieving a predetermined target value or trend

31. The method as claimed in claim 30, wherein the cumulative variable comprises at least one of the following:

time, driving distance, position, map coordinate, amount of fuel consumed, cumulative number of work units handled, and cumulative surface area of work units handled.

32. The method as claimed in claim 31, wherein the information about a change further comprises at least one of the following:

type of change, changed setting value before the change, changed setting value after the change, changed condition before the change, changed condition after the change, changed working method before the change, and changed working method after the change.

33. The method as claimed in claim 30, wherein the point of the change comprises a point of time of the change.

34. The method as claimed in claim 30, wherein the change is automatically determined by the processor on the basis of data collected by an information system of the forest work unit.

35. The method as claimed in claim 30, wherein the method further comprises extrapolating an effect of the changes to a cumulative variable period longer than the monitoring period.

36. The method as claimed in claim 35, wherein the cumulative variable period is one of the following:

work shift, work site and year.

37. The method as claimed in claim 30, further comprising automatically determining in the processor data to be used for determining the at least one key indicator on the basis of at least one predetermined criterion.

38. The method as claimed in claim 37, further comprising the step of selecting by an user with the user interface at least one criterion for restricting the data to be used for determining the at least one key indicator.

39. The method as claimed in claim 30, further comprising:

determining in advance that the work units to be handled are divided into a predetermined number of reference groups or that each reference group is to comprise a predetermined number of work units; and

generating at least one criterion determining a reference group by determining threshold values in a dynamic manner.

40. The method as claimed in claim 30, further comprising:

providing a plurality of work units subjected to the operations of the forest work unit;

determining in the processor at least one characteristic for grouping the plurality of work units;

determining a first work unit, on the basis of the at least one characteristic, as belonging to a specific reference group;

determining a second work unit, on the basis of the at least one characteristic, as belonging to said specific reference group as the first work unit;

determining in the processor the at least one key indicator for said first work unit, and the at least one key indicator for the second work unit;

determining in the processor, on the basis of the key indicators describing a work phase and determined for the first and second work units belonging to the same specific reference group, a corresponding key indicator common to the specific reference group and describing the work phase;

comparing in the processor the value of the key indicator describing the work phase of said first work unit with the value of the key indicator describing the work phase and common to the specific reference group to which said first work unit belongs; and

presenting in the user interface said key indicator describing the work phase of said first work unit and the corresponding key indicator common to the specific reference group and describing the work phase.

41. The method as claimed in claim 40, wherein each of the plurality of work units further comprises at least one of the following:

a stem, load, work site, first stem group, first load group and first work site group.

42. The method as claimed in claim 41, wherein the first work unit is a stem, load, work site being handled at the time of the determining.

43. The method as claimed in claim 41, wherein a reference group comprises at least one of the following:

a second stem group, second load group and second work site group.

44. The method as claimed in claim 40, comprising extrapolating an effect of the stored changes to a cumulative variable period longer than the monitoring period.

45. The method as claimed in claim 30, further comprising presenting the key indicator describing the operation of the forest work unit as a function of time or some other cumulative variable.

54. The method as claimed in claim 30, wherein:

the user interface includes a first user interface element and a second user interface element, and

the first user interface element is configured to present at least a graphical representation of the key indicator describing the operation of the forest work unit, the graphical presentation comprising a graph in which the key indicator is presented on a first axis, the cumulative variable is presented on a second axis, and changes are depicted with indicator lines arranged at a position on the second axis corresponding to the cumulative variable of each change.

55. The method as claimed in claim 30, wherein the user interface is configured to enable the changes and information relating to changes to be edited, deleted and added afterwards.

56. The method as claimed in claim 54, wherein is the first under interface element is configured to present a flag pattern arranged to a top or bottom of at least one indicator line to show the change, the pattern comprising the information about the change given in the form of text provided in connection with the flag pattern and/or shown by an outer appearance of the flag pattern.

57. The method as claimed in claim 56, wherein the information about the change provided in connection with the flag pattern in text format comprises at least one of the following:

the time of the change, the relationship of the change to some other cumulative variable, the type of the change and a forecast on the effect of the change on a cumulative variable period longer than the monitoring period.

58. The method as claimed in claim 40, wherein:

the user interface includes a first user interface element and a second user interface element,

the first user interface element is configured to present at least a graphical representation of the key indicator describing the operation of the forest work unit, the graphical presentation comprising a graph in which the key indicator is presented on a first axis, the cumulative variable is presented on a second axis, and changes are depicted with indicator lines arranged at a position on the second axis corresponding to the cumulative variable of each change, and

the second user interface element is configured to show at least the key indicator describing the work phase of the first work unit and the corresponding key indicator common to the specific reference group and describing the work phase, and a comparison thereof.

46. An arrangement for optimizing an operation of a forest work unit, the arrangement comprising:

at least a memory;

a processor configured to at least;

determine at least one key indicator describing the operation of the forest work unit through a measurement of the operation of the forest work unit, the at least one key indicator being representative of efficiency or productivity of the forest work unit in relation to a specific forest work task;

determining a change affecting the operation of the forest work unit and having an influence on a value or a trend of the at least one key indicator; and

store information about the change into the memory, the information comprising at least a point of the change in relation to a cumulative variable; and

a user interface configured to present the key indicator describing the operation of the forest work unit relating to a monitoring period, and the change along with the information about the change according to occurrence of the change relating to the monitoring period, the change along with the information about the change being presented in a way correlating to the at least one key indicator presented in the user interface,

wherein the processor is further configured to adjust the operation of the forest work unit for guiding the at least one key indicator towards a desired value according to the correlation between the at least one key indicator and the change presented in the user interface, thereby optimizing the operation of the forest work unit, and

wherein the change comprises at least one of the following;

a change relating to the work site, a change relating to working conditions, a change in settings, servicing, repair or maintenance operation carried out on the forest work unit or a part thereof, a change in working method and a change in a key indicator to be monitored when achieving a predetermined target value or trend.

47. The arrangement as claimed in claim 46, wherein

the processor is further configured to:

determine at least one characteristic for grouping a plurality of work units;

determine a first work unit, on the basis of the at least one characteristic, as belonging to a specific reference group;

determine a second work unit, on the basis of the at least one characteristic, as belonging to said specific reference group as the first work unit;

determine the at least one key indicator for said first work unit, and the at least one key indicator for the second work unit;

determine, on the basis of the key indicators describing a work phase and determined for the first and second work units belonging to the same specific reference group, a corresponding key indicator common to the specific reference group and describing the work phase; and

compare the value of the key indicator describing the work phase of said first work unit with the value of the key indicator describing work efficiency and common to the specific reference group to which said first work unit belongs, and wherein the user interface is further configured to present both said key indicator describing the work phase of said first work unit and the corresponding key indicator common to the specific reference group and describing the work phase.

48. The arrangement as claimed in claim 46, further comprising an information system configured to collect data used for determining the change,

wherein the processor is further configured to automatically determine the change on the basis of the data collected by the information system of the forest work unit.

49. The arrangement as claimed in claim 46, wherein the processor comprises at least one of the following:

a programmable logic, programmable microprocessor and embedded information system.

50. The arrangement as claimed in claim 46, wherein the user interface comprises at least a display and at least one user input device.

51. The arrangement as claimed in claim 50, wherein the user input device comprises at least one of the following:

at least one button, a mouse, a joystick and a touch screen.

52. The arrangement as claimed in claim 46, the processor is further configured to store information on a characteristic of an individual stem into said memory and retrieve from said memory the stored characteristic to define a stem group to which the individual stem belongs.

53. The arrangement as claimed in claim 46, further comprising a forest work unit or a forest work simulator.

59. A method for optimazing an operation of a forest work unit, the method comprising at least the following steps:

identifying a change affecting the operation of the forest work unit;

storing information about the change into a memory;

determining in a processor at least one key indicator describing the operation of the forest work unit;

presenting in a user interface the key indicator describing the operation of the forest work unit and information on identified changes relating to a monitoring period, wherein the change affecting the operation of the forest work unit comprises at least one of the following;

a change relating to the work site, change relating to working conditions, change in settings, servicing, repair or maintenance operation carried out on the forest work unit or a part thereof, change in working method and a key indicator to be monitored achieving a predetermined target value or trend;

determining in the processor at least one characteristic of at least one first work unit on the basis of which the work unit is determined as belonging to a specific reference group;

determining in the processor at least one key indicator describing a forest work unit operation for said first work unit and, in addition, at least one second work unit, the second work unit belonging at least on the basis of the characteristic of said work unit to the same reference group as said first work unit;

determining in the processor, on the basis of the key indicators describing a work phase and determined for the work units belonging to the same reference group, a corresponding key indicator common to the reference group and describing the work phase;

comparing in the processor the value of the key indicator describing the work phase of said first work unit with the value of the key indicator describing the work phase and common to the reference group to which said first work unit belongs; and

presenting in the user interface said key indicator describing the work phase of said first work unit and the corresponding key indicator common to the reference group and describing the work phase.

60. An arrangement for optimizing an operation of a forest work unit, the arrangement comprising:

at least a memory;

a processor configured to at least;

identify a change affecting the operation of the forest work unit;

store information about the change into a memory; and

determine at least one key indicator describing the operation of the forest work unit; and

a user interface configured to present the key indicator describing the operation of the forest work unit and the identified information on changes falling within the monitoring period,

wherein the change affecting the operation of the forest work unit comprises at least one of the following;

a change relating to the work site, change relating to working conditions, change in settings, servicing, repair or maintenance operation carried out on the forest work unit or a part thereof, change in working method and a key indicator to be monitored achieving a predetermined target value or trend,

wherein the processor is further configured to at least determine;

at least one characteristic of at least one first work unit, on the basis of which the first work unit is defined as belonging to a specific reference group;

at least one key indicator describing a predetermined work phase of the forest work unit both for said first work unit and for at least one second work unit, the second work unit belonging at least on the basis of said characteristic of the work unit to the same reference group as the first work unit; and

on the basis of the key indicators describing a work phase and determined for the work units belonging to the same reference group a corresponding key indicator common to the reference group and describing the work phase;

and to compare the value of the key indicator describing the work phase of said first work unit with the value of the key indicator describing work efficiency and common to the reference group to which said first work unit belongs; and

wherein the user interface is further configured to present both said key indicator describing the work phase of said first work unit and the corresponding key indicator common to the reference group and describing the work phase.