APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR ROUTING

• US 20170254649A1
• Filed: 08/06/2015
• Published: 09/07/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 08/07/2014
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Navionics SRL (Garmin Limited)
• Original Assignee: Navionics Spa (Garmin Limited)
• Inventors: Carnevali, Giuseppe
• Application Number:
  US15/329,295
• Publication Number:
  US 20170254649A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• CPC Class Codes: B63J 99/00 Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 21/20 Instruments for performing navigational calculations G01C21/24, G01C21/26 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 21/203 Specially adapted for sailing ships

Abstract

An electronic navigational system (100) may automatically develop nautical routes based on one or more waypoints that are non-navigable provided by a user.

Claims

1. An electronic navigational route developer, comprising:

an electronic marine route developer to employ measured water depth information to develop marine navigational routes; and

a user interface to accept user input regarding a waypoint of a marine route, wherein the electronic route developer is configured to;

determine whether a user-supplied waypoint is a point of navigability; and

automatically develop a marine route based upon a user-supplied non-navigable waypoint, wherein the electronic marine route developer employs water depth measurements to determine a navigable waypoint for substitution in the route in lieu of the non-navigable waypoint.

2. The electronic navigational route developer of claim 1, wherein the navigational route developer is configured to automatically develop a marine route by discretizing into uniform square discretized cells a multidimensional region that encompasses start and end waypoints with nodes placed in cells, each node connected with its neighbors, and develops a marine route that includes at least one intervening waypoint when the end waypoint and start waypoint are not points of navigable visibility to one another, wherein the electronic router includes water depth measurements in a determination of navigable visibility.

3. The electronic navigational route developer of claim 1, wherein the navigational route developer is configured to determine that a waypoint located on land is a point of non-navigability.

4. The electronic navigational route developer of claim 1, wherein the navigational route developer is configured to determine that a speed limitation associated with a waypoint renders it a point of non-navigability.

5. The electronic navigational route developer of claim 1, wherein the navigational route developer is configured to determine that an overhead obstruction associated with a waypoint renders it a point of non-navigability.

6. The electronic navigational route developer of claim 1, wherein the navigational route developer is configured to determine that an overhead obstruction between waypoints renders one of the waypoints a point of non-navigability.

7. The electronic navigational route developer of claim 1, wherein the navigational route developer is configured to determine that a waypoint is non-navigable based on a characteristic of the user'"'"'s vessel.

8. The electronic navigational route developer of claim 7, wherein the characteristic is the vessel'"'"'s draft.

9. The electronic navigational route developer of claim 7, wherein the characteristic is the vessel'"'"'s beam.

10. The electronic navigational route developer of claim 7, wherein the characteristic is the vessel'"'"'s height.

11. The electronic navigational route developer of claim 1, wherein the navigational route developer is configured to determine that a waypoint is non-navigable based on the width of a marine passage.

12. The electronic navigational route developer of claim 1, wherein the navigational route developer is configured to determine that a waypoint is non-navigable based on the absences of navigation aids in the region of the waypoint.

13. The electronic navigational route developer of claim 1, wherein the navigational route developer is configured to determine that a waypoint is non-navigable based on indicia of mandatory routes.

14. The electronic navigational route developer of claim 1, wherein the navigational route developer is configured to provide a substitute waypoint to a user and allow a user to choose whether to use the substitute waypoint in the development of a marine route.

15. A method of automatically developing a marine route in an electronic route developer, comprising:

an electronic marine route developer employing measured water depth information to develop marine navigational routes; and

a user interface accepting user input regarding a waypoint of a marine route, wherein the electronic route developer;

determines whether a user-supplied waypoint is a point of navigability; and

automatically develops a marine route based upon a user-supplied non-navigable waypoint, wherein the electronic marine route developer employs water depth measurements to determine a navigable waypoint for substitution in the route in lieu of the non-navigable waypoint, wherein the navigational route developer automatically develops a marine route by discretizing into uniform square discretized cells a multidimensional region that encompasses start and end waypoints with nodes placed in cells, each node connected with its neighbors, and develops a marine route that includes at least one intervening waypoint when the end waypoint and start waypoint are not points of navigable visibility to one another, wherein the electronic router includes water depth measurements in a determination of navigable visibility.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the route developer provides a substitute waypoint to a user and allows a user to choose whether to use the substitute waypoint in the development of a marine route.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein the route developer determines that a waypoint is non-navigable based on a characteristic of the user'"'"'s vessel.

18. The method of claim 15, wherein the route developer determines that a waypoint is non-navigable based on a speed limitation associated with the user-supplied waypoint.

19. The method of claim 15, wherein the route developer determines that a waypoint is non-navigable based on indicia of mandatory routes.

20. The method of claim 17, wherein the characteristic is the vessel'"'"'s draft.