SUPPRESSION OF AUTHORIZATION RISK FEEDBACK TO MITIGATE RISK FACTOR MANIPULATION IN AN AUTHORIZATION SYSTEM

• US 20170279787A1
• Filed: 06/09/2017
• Published: 09/28/2017
• Est. Priority Date: 12/18/2015
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Cheng, Pau-Chen, Koved, Lawrence, Singh, Kapil K., Swart, Calvin B., Trewin, Sharon M.
• Granted Patent: US 10,091,181 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/31 User authentication
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/554 involving event detection and direct action
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/577 Assessing vulnerabilities and evaluating computer system security
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2221/2111 Location-sensitive, e.g. geographical location, GPS
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2221/2125 Just-in-time application of countermeasures, e.g., on-the-fly decryption, just-in-time obfuscation or de-obfuscation
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2221/2139 Recurrent verification
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/08 for authentication of entities cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for entity authentication H04L9/32
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/10 for controlling access to devices or network resources
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1425 Traffic logging, e.g. anomaly detection
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1433 Vulnerability analysis
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 12/06 Authentication
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 12/08 Access security
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 12/12 Detection or prevention of fraud
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 12/63 Location-dependent; Proximity-dependent
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 12/67 Risk-dependent, e.g. selecting a security level depending on risk profiles

Abstract

Dynamic risk communication associated with a computer device may include automatically detecting one or more security risk factors for the computer device based on current context information associated with the computer device. Whether an attempt is being made via the computer device to manipulate the one or more risk factors in an attempt to reduce a security level of a computer-implemented authentication procedure may be determined. Responsive to determining that the attempt is being made to manipulate the one or more risk factors, a new challenge for additional identification may be communicated for presentation on a user interface device of the computer device while suppressing one or more security risk factors from being presented on the user interface device. Responsive to determining that an attempt is not being made to manipulate the one or more risk factors, the new challenge and one or more security risk factors may be communicated.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method of dynamic risk communication associated with a computer device, the method performed by one or more hardware processors, comprising:

automatically detecting one or more security risk factors for the computer device based on current context information associated with the computer device, the security risk factors used for authenticating a user, wherein for selected security risk factors the computer device requires additional information before authenticating the user;

determining whether an attempt is being made via the computer device to discover the one or more security risk factors to manipulate the computer device from using the selected security risk factors and from requiring the additional information in an attempt to reduce a security level of a computer-implemented authentication procedure;

responsive to determining that the attempt is being made to manipulate the one or more security risk factors, communicating a new challenge for additional identification for presenting on a user interface device of the computer device and suppressing the one or more security risk factors from being presented on the user interface device.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more security risk factors are analyzed at a security risk determination engine to generate a security risk level based on the current context information and historical patterns associated with one or more users and the computer device.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein feedback from a user associated with the computer device is received, the feedback regarding the one or more security risk factors that are automatically detected, and the security risk level is recomputed based on the feedback.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising communicating the one or more security risk factors by displaying risk indicators by at least one of text, visual (icons) and audio display.

5. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating one or more options that reduce the one or more security risk factors, the one or more options for presenting on the user interface device.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising automatically mitigating a security risk for a user associated with one or more users and the computer device, wherein the automatically mitigating a security risk comprises at least one of altering or substituting a user authentication interaction technique.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

responsive to determining that no attempt is being made to manipulate the one or more security risk factors, communicating the new challenge for additional identification and the one or more security risk factors for presentation on the user interface device.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein the automatically detecting of the one or more security risk factors comprises comparing the current context information associated with the computer device with historical patterns of user behavior associated with one or more users and the computer device.

9. A computer readable storage medium storing a program of instructions executable by a machine to perform a method of dynamic risk communication associated with a computer device, the method comprising:

automatically detecting one or more security risk factors for the computer device based on current context information associated with the computer device, the security risk factors used for authenticating a user, wherein for selected security risk factors the computer device requires additional information before authenticating the user;

determining whether an attempt is being made via the computer device to discover the one or more security risk factors to manipulate the computer device from using the selected security risk factors and from requiring the additional information in an attempt to reduce a security level of a computer-implemented authentication procedure;

responsive to determining that the attempt is being made to manipulate the one or more security risk factors, communicating a new challenge for additional identification for presenting on a user interface device of the computer device and suppressing the one or more security risk factors from being presented on the user interface device.

10. The computer readable storage medium of claim 9, wherein the one or more security risk factors are analyzed at a security risk determination engine to generate a security risk level based on the current context information and historical patterns associated with one or more users and the computer device.

11. The computer readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein feedback from a user associated with the computer device is received, the feedback regarding the one or more security risk factors that are automatically detected, and the security risk level is recomputed based on the feedback.

12. The computer readable storage medium of claim 9, further comprising communicating the one or more security risk factors by displaying risk indicators by at least one of text, visual (icons) and audio display.

13. The computer readable storage medium of claim 9, further comprising generating one or more options that reduce the one or more security risk factors, the one or more options for presenting on the user interface device.

14. The computer readable storage medium of claim 9, further comprising automatically mitigating a security risk for a user associated with one or more users and the computer device, wherein the automatically mitigating a security risk comprises at least one of altering or substituting a user authentication interaction technique.

15. The computer readable storage medium of claim 9, wherein the method further comprises, responsive to determining that no attempt is being made to manipulate the one or more security risk factors, communicating the new challenge for additional identification and the one or more security risk factors for presentation on the user interface device.

16. The computer readable storage medium of claim 9, wherein the automatically detecting of the one or more security risk factors comprises comparing the current context information associated with the computer device with historical patterns of user behavior associated with one or more users and the computer device.

17. A system for dynamic risk communication associated with a computer device, comprising:

one or more computer processors coupled to a memory,

one or more of computer processors operable to automatically detect one or more security risk factors for the computer device based on current context information associated with the computer device, the security risk factors used for authenticating a user, wherein for selected security risk factors the computer device requires additional information before authenticating the user,

one or more of computer processors further operable to determine whether an attempt is being made via the computer device to discover the one or more security risk factors to manipulate the computer device from using the selected security risk factors and from requiring the additional information in an attempt to reduce a security level of a computer-implemented authentication procedure,

responsive to determining that the attempt is being made to manipulate the one or more security risk factors, one or more of computer processors further operable to communicate a new challenge for additional identification for presenting on a user interface device of the computer device and suppress the one or more security risk factors from being presented on the user interface device.

18. The system of claim 17, wherein the one or more security risk factors are analyzed at a security risk determination engine to generate a security risk level based on the current context information and historical patterns associated with one or more users and the computer device, and wherein feedback from a user associated with the computer device is received, the feedback regarding the one or more security risk factors that are automatically detected, and the security risk level is recomputed based on the feedback.

19. The system of claim 17, wherein responsive to determining that a second attempt is not being made to manipulate the one or more security risk factors, one or more of computer processors are further operable to communicate the new challenge for additional identification and the one or more security risk factors for presentation on the user interface device.

20. The system of claim 17, wherein one or more of computer processors are further operable further to communicate the one or more security risk factors by displaying risk indicators by at least one of text, visual (icons) and audio display.