SENSE AND AVOID MANEUVERING

• US 20180033318A1
• Filed: 07/29/2016
• Published: 02/01/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 07/29/2016
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: GE Aviation Systems LLC (GE Aerospace)
• Original Assignee: GE Aviation Systems LLC (GE Aerospace)
• Inventors: Yeh, Kevin
• Application Number:
  US15/223,541
• Publication Number:
  US 20180033318A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• CPC Class Codes: G05D 1/0055 with safety arrangements
• CPC Class Codes: G05D 1/0088 characterized by the autonomous decision making process, e.g. artificial intelligence, predefined behaviours using knowledge based models G06N5/00
• CPC Class Codes: G05D 1/106 Change initiated in response to external conditions, e.g. avoidance of elevated terrain or of no-fly zones
• CPC Class Codes: G05D 1/1064 specially adapted for avoiding collisions with other aircraft
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0008 with other aircraft
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0021 located in the aircraft
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0052 for cruising combined instruments indicating more than one navigational value G01C23/00
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0069 specially adapted for an unmanned aircraft
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0078 for monitoring traffic from the aircraft radar or analogous systems specially adapted for traffic control G01S13/91
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/045 Navigation or guidance aids, e.g. determination of anti-collision manoeuvers radar or analogous systems specially adapted for anti-collision between aircraft G01S13/933

Abstract

Systems and methods for navigating an unmanned aerial vehicle are provided. The method includes detecting a possible obstacle. The method includes determining a predicted path for the possible obstacle. The method includes determining that the possible obstacle will cause a collision with the unmanned aerial vehicle based on the predicted path. The method includes determining when the possible obstacle is cooperative. The method includes controlling the unmanned aerial vehicle to perform an avoidance maneuver when the possible obstacle is not cooperative. The method includes determining whether to initiate communications with the possible obstacle when the possible obstacle is cooperative.

Claims

1. A method for navigating an unmanned aerial vehicle comprising:

detecting, by one or more processors associated with a flight management system of an unmanned aerial vehicle, a possible obstacle;

determining, by the one or more processors, a predicted path for the possible obstacle;

determining, by the one or more processors, that the possible obstacle will cause a collision with the unmanned aerial vehicle based on the predicted path;

determining, by the one or more processors, when the possible obstacle is cooperative;

when the possible obstacle is not cooperative, controlling the unmanned aerial vehicle to perform an avoidance maneuver; and

when the possible obstacle is cooperative, determining whether to initiate communications with the possible obstacle.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

when a determination to initiate communications with the possible obstacle is made, negotiating with the possible obstacle.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein negotiating with the possible obstacle comprises:

determining that the unmanned aerial vehicle has a right of way; and

controlling the unmanned aerial vehicle to maintain a current course.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein negotiating with the possible obstacle comprises:

determining that the possible obstacle will yield to the unmanned aerial vehicle; and

controlling the unmanned aerial vehicle to maintain a current course.

5. The method of claim 2, wherein negotiating with the possible obstacle comprises sending a communication to the possible obstacle, wherein the communication causes the possible obstacle to change course.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein in response to negotiating with the possible obstacle the method comprises performing an avoidance maneuver.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising returning to a planned course after performing the avoidance maneuver.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein determining when the possible obstacle is cooperative comprises determining whether communication with the possible obstacle is possible.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the communication comprises communication via one or more transponders.

10. A flight management system for navigating an unmanned aerial vehicle, the system comprising one or more processors and one or more memory devices included with the unmanned aerial vehicle, the one or more memory devices storing instructions that when executed by the one or more processors cause the one or more processors to perform operations, the operations comprising:

detecting a possible obstacle;

determining a predicted path for the possible obstacle;

determining that the possible obstacle will cause a collision with the unmanned aerial vehicle based on the predicted path;

when the possible obstacle is not detected via a one or more cooperative sensors, controlling the unmanned aerial vehicle to perform an avoidance maneuver; and

when the possible obstacle is detected via the one or more cooperative sensors, determining whether to initiate communications with the possible obstacle.

11. The flight management system of claim 10, further comprising:

when a determination to initiate communications with the possible obstacle is made, negotiating with the possible obstacle.

12. The flight management system of claim 11, wherein negotiating with the possible obstacle comprises:

determining that the unmanned aerial vehicle has a right of way; and

controlling the unmanned aerial vehicle to maintain a current course.

13. The flight management system of claim 11, wherein negotiating with the possible obstacle comprises:

determining that the possible obstacle will yield to the unmanned aerial vehicle; and

controlling the unmanned aerial vehicle to maintain a current course.

14. The flight management system of claim 11, wherein negotiating with the possible obstacle comprises causing the possible obstacle to alter a course.

15. The flight management system of claim 14, wherein in response to negotiating with the possible obstacle the operations further comprise performing an avoidance maneuver.

16. The flight management system of claim 15, wherein the operations further comprise returning to a planned course after the performed avoidance maneuver.

17. The flight management system of claim 10, wherein the one or more cooperative sensors comprise at least one transponder.

18. An unmanned aerial vehicle comprising:

one or more cooperative sensors;

one or more non-cooperative sensors;

a computing system comprising one or more processors and one or more memory devices located on the unmanned aerial vehicle, the one or more memory devices storing instructions that when executed by the one or more processors cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising;

detecting a possible obstacle;

determining a predicted path for the possible obstacle;

determining that the possible obstacle will cause a collision with the unmanned aerial vehicle based on the predicted path;

when the possible obstacle is not detected via the one or more cooperative sensors, controlling the unmanned aerial vehicle to perform an avoidance maneuver; and

when the possible obstacle is detected via the one or more cooperative sensors, initiating communications with the possible obstacle.

19. The unmanned aerial vehicle of claim 18, wherein the communications comprise one-way communications.

20. The unmanned aerial vehicle of claim 18, wherein the communications comprise two-way communications.