SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENSURING CONSISTENCY IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING USING THERMAL IMAGING

• US 20180169948A1
• Filed: 06/11/2016
• Published: 06/21/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 06/12/2015
• Status: Abandoned Application

• Current Assignee: Materialise NV
• Original Assignee: Materialise NV
• Inventors: COECK, Sam, VAN DEN ECKER, Piet, KUYPERS, Tristan, JANSSENS, Michel, CRAEGHS, Tom
• Application Number:
  US15/579,027
• Publication Number:
  US 20180169948A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• CPC Class Codes: B22F 10/12 by photopolymerisation, e.g. stereolithography [SLA] or digital light processing [DLP]
• CPC Class Codes: B22F 10/28 Powder bed fusion, e.g. selective laser melting [SLM] or electron beam melting [EBM]
• CPC Class Codes: B22F 10/32 of the atmosphere, e.g. composition or pressure in a building chamber
• CPC Class Codes: B22F 10/36 of energy beam parameters
• CPC Class Codes: B22F 10/362 for preheating
• CPC Class Codes: B22F 10/85 for controlling or regulating additive manufacturing processes
• CPC Class Codes: B22F 12/13 to preheat the material
• CPC Class Codes: B22F 12/47 parallel to the deposition plane
• CPC Class Codes: B22F 12/55 Two or more means for feeding material
• CPC Class Codes: B22F 12/90 Means for process control, e.g. cameras or sensors
• CPC Class Codes: B22F 2203/03 for feed-back
• CPC Class Codes: B22F 2203/11 temperature, temperature profile
• CPC Class Codes: B22F 2999/00 Aspects linked to processes or compositions used in powder metallurgy
• CPC Class Codes: B29C 64/153 using layers of powder being selectively joined, e.g. by selective laser sintering or melting
• CPC Class Codes: B29C 64/393 for controlling or regulating additive manufacturing processes
• CPC Class Codes: B33Y 10/00 Processes of additive manufacturing
• CPC Class Codes: B33Y 30/00 Apparatus for additive manufacturing; Details thereof or accessories therefor
• CPC Class Codes: B33Y 50/02 for controlling or regulating additive manufacturing processes
• CPC Class Codes: G01J 2005/0077 Imaging
• CPC Class Codes: G01J 5/10 using electric radiation detectors
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 25/04 : of melting point; of freezing point; of softening point
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 25/72 : Investigating presence of flaws
• CPC Class Codes: Y02P 10/25 : Process efficiency

Abstract

Embodiments set forth in this application relate to systems and methods by which parts produced by additive manufacturing can be reliably assessed for conformity to a known master model which has quality conforming to the desired specifications. These systems and methods involve recording a thermal history of the manufacturing process of each part. The recorded thermal history is then compared to the previously-recorded thermal history of the master model. Significant deviations in thermal history are indicative of irregularities in the manufacturing build, and the part quality may then be assessed in view of those irregularities.

Claims

1. A quality control system for assessing quality of a manufactured part in an additive manufacturing apparatus, comprising:

a laser scanning system;

a thermal imaging device; and

a control computer,

wherein the control computer is configured to;

initiate laser scanning of a building area in the additive manufacturing apparatus by the laser scanning system in order to manufacture the part;

cause the thermal imaging device to capture images of at least a portion of the building area during the laser scanning of the building area;

store the captured images as thermal data in a memory;

store build process data corresponding to fee laser scanning by the laser scanning system and a recoating of build material on the building area in the memory;

derive a thermal history for at least a portion of the part from the thermal data and the build process data, wherein the thermal history comprises temperature fluctuations for the at least the portion of the part during laser scanning and recoating; and

compare the derived thermal history with a stored thermal history associated with a master model of the part,

wherein, a comparison of the derived thermal history after laser scanning and recoating with the stored thermal history indicates whether the part is conformal to the master model.

3. The quality control system of claim 1, wherein the control computer is configured to determine that the part is conformal to the master model based on whether the derived thermal history of the part is within predefined tolerances of the stored thermal history.

2. (canceled)

4. The quality control system of claim 0, wherein to derive the thermal history for the at least the portion of the part comprises to:

select a point of the at least the portion of the part; and

calculate a thermal history curve for the point of the at least the portion of the part based on the thermal data and the build process data.

5. The quality control system of claim 0, wherein to calculate the thermal history curve for the point comprises to extrapolate

temperature values indicative of a temperature at a location of the point throughout scanning of a layer of the manufactured part.

8. The quality control system of claim 5, wherein the control computer is configured to calculate the thermal history curve in real-time, and wherein the control computer is further configured to modify parameters associated with one or more subsequent layers in a build process of the part based on the calculated thermal history curve.

6. The quality control system of claim 0, wherein the comparison of the derived thermal history with the stored thermal history comprises a comparison of amounts of time the temperature at the location of the point exceeded a predefined reference temperature in each of the derived thermal history and the stored thermal history.

7. The quality control system of claim 0, wherein the predefined reference temperature is a melting point of a building material used to manufacture at least one of the manufactured part and the master model.

9. A method of assessing quality of a part manufactured in an additive manufacturing apparatus, the method comprising:

initiating laser scanning of a building area in the additive manufacturing apparatus by a laser scanning system in order to manufacture the part;

causing a thermal imaging device to capture images of at least a portion of the building area during the laser scanning of the building area;

storing the captured images as thermal data in a memory;

storing build process data corresponding to the laser scanning by the laser scanning system and a recoating of build material on the building area in the memory;

deriving a thermal history for at least a portion of the part from the thermal data and the build process data, wherein the thermal history comprises temperature fluctuations for the at least the portion of the pan during laser scanning and recoating; and

comparing the derived thermal history with a stored thermal history associated with a master model of the part,

wherein, a comparison of the derived thermal history after scanning and recoating with the stored thermal history indicates whether the part is conformal to the master model.

11. The method of claim 9, further comprising determining that the part is conformal to the master model based on whether the derived thermal history of the part is within predefined tolerances of the stored thermal history.

12. The method of claim 9, wherein deriving the thermal history for the at least the portion of the part comprises:

selecting a point of the at least the portion of the part; and

calculating a thermal history curve for the point of the at least the portion of the part based on the thermal data and the build process data.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein calculating the thermal history curve for the point comprises extrapolating temperature values indicative of a temperature at a location of the point throughout scanning of a layer of the manufactured part.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein comparing the derived thermal history with the stored thermal history comprises comparing amounts of time the temperature at the location of the point exceeded a predefined reference temperature in each of the derived thermal history and the stored thermal history.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the predefined reference temperature is a melting point of a building material used to manufacture at least one of the manufactured part and the master model.

16. The method of claim 13, wherein calculating the thermal history curve is performed in real-time, and wherein the method further comprises modifying parameters associated with one or more subsequent layers in a build process of the part based on the calculated thermal history curve.

10. (canceled)