ASSESSING A FRACTURE PROPAGATION MODEL BASED ON SEISMIC DATA

• US 20180217285A1
• Filed: 06/04/2014
• Published: 08/02/2018
• Est. Priority Date: 06/04/2014
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Halliburton Energy Services Incorporated (Halliburton Company)
• Original Assignee: Halliburton Energy Services Incorporated (Halliburton Company)
• Inventors: Walters, Harold Grayson, Ranjan, Priyesh
• Granted Patent: US 10,520,625 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• CPC Class Codes: G01V 1/301 for determining seismic cross-sections or geostructures
• CPC Class Codes: G01V 1/303 for determining velocity profiles or travel times
• CPC Class Codes: G01V 1/42 using generators in one well and receivers elsewhere or vice versa G01V1/52 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01V 2210/646 Fractures

Abstract

Some aspects of what is described here relate to seismic data analysis techniques. A seismic excitation is generated in a first directional wellbore section in a subterranean region. A seismic response associated with the seismic excitation is detected in a second directional wellbore section in the subterranean region. A fracture treatment target region in the subterranean region is analyzed based on the seismic response. A fracture propagation model is assessed based on the analysis of the fracture treatment target region. In some cases, the fracture propagation model is assessed in real time during a fracture treatment.

Claims

1. A method comprising:

receiving seismic response data for a seismic response associated with a seismic excitation in a subterranean region, the seismic excitation generated in a first directional wellbore section in the subterranean region, the seismic response detected in a second directional wellbore section in the subterranean region; and

analyzing, by operation of a computer system, a fracture treatment target region in the subterranean region based on the seismic response data; and

assessing a fracture propagation model based on the analysis of the fracture treatment target region.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein assessing the fracture propagation model comprises validating the fracture propagation model.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising calibrating the fracture propagation model based on the assessment.

4. The method of claim 3, comprising, in real time during a fracture treatment of the subterranean region, iteratively:

receiving seismic response data detected during the fracture treatment;

analyzing the fracture treatment target region based on the seismic response data;

assessing the fracture propagation model based on the analysis; and

modifying the fracture treatment based on the assessment.

5. The method of claim 3, further comprising simulating a fracture treatment of the subterranean region using the calibrated fracture propagation model.

6. The method of claim 3, wherein analyzing the fracture treatment target region comprises determining geomechanical properties of subterranean rock in the fracture treatment target region, and the method comprises calibrating geomechanical parameters of the fracture propagation model based on the geomechanical properties of the subterranean rock.

7. The method of claim 3, wherein analyzing the fracture treatment target region comprises identifying fractures in the fracture treatment target region, and the method comprises calibrating fracture parameters of the fracture propagation model based on the identified fractures.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein analyzing the fracture treatment target region comprises identifying actual fracture propagation induced by a fracture treatment, and assessing the fracture propagation model comprises:

simulating the fracture treatment using the fracture propagation model; and

comparing the actual fracture propagation against predicted fracture propagation generated by the simulation.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein analyzing the fracture treatment target region comprises identifying actual geomechanical changes induced by a fracture treatment, and assessing the fracture propagation model comprises:

simulating the fracture treatment using the fracture propagation model; and

comparing the actual geomechanical changes against predicted geomechanical changes generated by the simulation.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein analyzing the fracture treatment target region comprises generating a seismic velocity model for the fracture treatment target region based on the seismic response data.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the fracture propagation model models fracture propagation dynamics for simulating a fracture treatment of the fracture treatment target region.

12. A computing system comprising:

data processing apparatus; and

memory storing computer-readable instructions that, when executed by the data processing apparatus, cause the data processing apparatus to perform operations comprising;

receiving seismic response data for a seismic response associated with a seismic excitation in a subterranean region, the seismic excitation generated in a first directional wellbore section in the subterranean region, the seismic response detected in a second directional wellbore section in the subterranean region;

analyzing a fracture treatment target region in the subterranean region based on the seismic response data; and

assessing a fracture propagation model based on the analysis of the fracture treatment target region.

13. The system of claim 12, wherein at least one of the first directional wellbore section or the second directional wellbore section is defined in a subterranean reservoir comprising at least a portion of the fracture treatment target region.

14. The system of claim 12, the operations comprising, in real time during a fracture treatment of the subterranean region, iteratively:

receiving seismic response data detected during the fracture treatment;

analyzing the fracture treatment target region based on the seismic response data;

assessing the fracture propagation model based on the analysis; and

modifying the fracture treatment based on the assessment.

15. The system of claim 12, wherein analyzing the fracture treatment target region comprises identifying actual changes in the subterranean region induced by a fracture treatment, and evaluating the fracture propagation model comprises:

simulating the fracture treatment using the fracture propagation model; and

comparing the actual changes against predicted changes generated by the simulation.

16. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by data processing apparatus, cause the data processing apparatus to perform operations comprising:

receiving seismic response data for a seismic response associated with a seismic excitation in a subterranean region, the seismic excitation generated in a first directional wellbore section in the subterranean region, the seismic response detected in a second directional wellbore section in the subterranean region; and

analyzing a fracture treatment target region in the subterranean region based on the seismic response data; and

assessing a fracture propagation model based on the analysis of the fracture treatment target region.

17. The computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein assessing the fracture propagation model comprises validating the fracture propagation model.

18. The computer-readable medium of claim 16, the operations further comprising calibrating the fracture propagation model based on the assessment.

19. The computer-readable medium of claim 18, the operations comprising, in real time during a fracture treatment of the subterranean region, iteratively:

receiving seismic response data detected during the fracture treatment;

analyzing the fracture treatment target region based on the seismic response data;

assessing the fracture propagation model based on the analysis; and

modifying the fracture treatment based on the assessment.

20. The computer-readable medium of claim 16, wherein analyzing the fracture treatment target region comprises identifying actual changes in the subterranean region induced by a fracture treatment, and evaluating the fracture propagation model comprises:

simulating the fracture treatment by operating the fracture propagation model; and

comparing the actual changes against predicted changes generated by the simulation.