METHOD FOR THE DESIGN AND EFFICIENT MANUFACTURE OF FIBER-COMPOSITE PARTS

• US 20200130297A1
• Filed: 10/28/2019
• Published: 04/30/2020
• Est. Priority Date: 10/26/2018
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: Arris Composites, Inc.
• Original Assignee: Arris Composites, Inc.
• Inventors: ESCOWITZ, Ethan, PERKINS, J. Scott, REESE, Riley, DAVIDSON, Erick, HENNESSEE, Sean
• Granted Patent: US 10,800,115 B2
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• CPC Class Codes: B29C 70/202 arranged in parallel planes or structures of fibres crossing at substantial angles, e.g. cross-moulding compound [XMC] B29C70/207 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: B29C 70/30 Shaping by lay-up, i.e. applying fibres, tape or broadsheet on a mould, former or core; Shaping by spray-up, i.e. spraying of fibres on a mould, former or core
• CPC Class Codes: B29C 70/46 using matched moulds, e.g. for deforming sheet moulding compounds [SMC] or prepregs
• CPC Class Codes: B29C 70/54 Component parts, details or accessories; Auxiliary operations , e.g. feeding or storage of prepregs or SMC after impregnation or during ageing
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2111/04 Constraint-based CAD
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2113/22 Moulding
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2113/24 Sheet material
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2113/26 Composites
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2119/14 Force analysis or force optimisation, e.g. static or dynamic forces
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2119/18 Manufacturability analysis or optimisation for manufacturability
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/17 Mechanical parametric or variational design
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/23 using finite element methods [FEM] or finite difference methods [FDM]

Abstract

A method for designing fiber-composite parts in which part performance and manufacturing efficiency can be traded-off against one another to provide an “optimized” design for a desired use case. In some embodiments, the method involves generating an idealized fiber map, wherein the orientation of fibers throughout the prospective part align with the anticipated load conditions throughout the part, and then modifying the idealized fiber map by various fabrication constraints to generate a process-compensated preform map.

Claims

1. A method for designing a fiber-composite part, the method comprising:

defining a geometry of the part and forces to which the part will be subjected;

determining stress contours of the part based on the geometry and the forces;

generating an idealized fiber map from the stress contours, wherein a direction of fibers in the idealized fiber map aligns with the stress contours of the part;

defining a plurality of constraints applicable to fabrication of the part; and

generating a first process-compensated preform map by modifying the idealized fiber map by the constraints, wherein the first process-compensated preform map provides the size, shape, orientation, and number of preforms that are required for fabricating the part.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising placing preforms, having the size and shape of the preforms in first process-compensated preform map, in a mold, wherein the preforms are placed in the mold in accordance with the orientation specified in the first process-compensated preform map.

3. The method of claim 2 further comprising molding the part, by applying heat and pressure to the preforms in the mold, in accordance with compression molding protocols.

4. The method of claim 3 further comprising testing the part to determine at least one performance measure of the part.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein defining constraints further comprises applying a weighting to at least some of the constraints, wherein the weighting affects at least one of the size, shape, and orientation of the preforms appearing in the first process-compensated preform map.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein after generating the first process-compensated preform map, the method further comprises:

altering the weighting of at least one constraint of the plurality of constraints; and

generating a second process-compensated preform map, wherein at least one of the size, shape, orientation, and number of preforms therein is different than for the preforms in the first process-compensated preform map as a consequence of the altered weighting.

7. The method of claim 4, and further comprising varying at least one constraint of the plurality of constraints over a range, wherein for each variation in the constraint, a part is fabricated based on a generated process-compensated preform map, and the part is tested to obtain a performance measure, wherein, the constraint is sufficiently varied so that the range encompasses:

(i) a first value of the constraint at which the part exhibits a maxima in the performance measure; and

(ii) a second value of the constraint at which the performance measure of the part falls below an acceptable value.

8. The method of claim 7, and further comprising selecting, as a design for the composite part, the process-compensated preform map corresponding to a value of the constraint falling within the range defined between and including the first value and the second value.

9. The method of claim 7, and further comprising selecting, as a design for the composite part, the process-compensated preform map corresponding to the first value of the constraint, thereby providing a design for best part performance.

10. The method of claim 7, and further comprising selecting, as a design for the composite part, the process-compensated preform map corresponding to the second value of the constraint, thereby providing a design for optimized fabrication efficiency.

11. A method for designing a fiber-composite part, the method comprising:

defining a geometry of the part and forces to which the part will be subjected;

determining stress contours of the part based on the geometry and the forces;

generating an idealized fiber map from the stress contours, wherein a direction of fibers in the idealized fiber map aligns with the stress contours of the part; and

determining, from the idealized fiber map, a size, shape, orientation, and number of preforms that are required for fabricating the part, consistent with the defined geometry and forces.

12. The method of claim 11, and further comprising placing preforms, having the determined size and shape, in a mold, wherein the preforms are placed in the mold in accordance with the determined orientation.

13. The method of claim 12, and further comprising molding the part, by applying heat and pressure to the preforms in the mold, in accordance with compression molding protocols.

14. The method of claim 13, and further comprising testing the part to determine at least one performance measure of the part.

15. A method for designing a fiber-composite part, the method comprising generating a process-compensated preform map by applying, to idealized fiber paths within the fiber-composite part that are based on loading conditions, one or more fabrication constraints, wherein the first process-compensated preform map provides the size, shape, orientation, and number of preforms that are required for fabricating the fiber-composite part.

16. The method of claim 15, and further comprising fabricating the part using the preforms specified by the first process-compensated preform map.

17. The method of claim 16, and further comprising testing the part to determine at least one performance measure of the part.

18. The method of claim 15, and further wherein a weighting is applied to at least one of the fabrication constraints, wherein the weighting affects at least one of the size, shape, and orientation of the preforms appearing in the first process-compensated preform map.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein after generating the first process-compensated preform map, the method further comprises:

altering the weighting applied to the at least one fabrication constraint; and

generating a second process-compensated preform map based on the altered weighting, wherein at least one of the size, shape, orientation, and number of preforms therein is different than for the preforms in the first process-compensated preform map.

20. The method of claim 18, and further comprising varying the weighting applied to the at least one fabrication constraint over a range, wherein for each variation in weighting, a part is fabricated based on a generated process-compensated preform map, and the part is tested to obtain a performance measure, wherein, the weighting is sufficiently varied so that the range encompasses:

(i) a first value of the fabrication constraint at which the part exhibits a maxima in the performance measure; and

(ii) a second value of the fabrication constraint at which the performance measure of the part falls below an acceptable value.

21. The method of claim 20, and further comprising selecting, as a design for the fiber-composite part, the process-compensated preform map corresponding to a value of the constraint falling within the range defined between and including the first value and the second value.