AUTOMATED SYSTEM FOR RATING EMPLOYER SCREENING PRACTICES AND CORPORATE MANAGEMENT

• US 20200133684A1
• Filed: 12/11/2019
• Published: 04/30/2020
• Est. Priority Date: 07/15/2014
• Status: Active Application

• Current Assignee: Christopher L. Rothwell, Thomas P. Boles
• Original Assignee: Christopher L. Rothwell, Thomas P. Boles
• Inventors: BOLES, Thomas P., ROTHWELL, Christopher L.
• Application Number:
  US16/711,219
• Publication Number:
  US 20200133684A1
• Time in Patent Office: Days
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2009/45575 Starting, stopping, suspending or resuming virtual machine instances
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/4401 Bootstrapping security arrangements therefor G06F21/57
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/4408 Boot device selection
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/4416 Network booting; Remote initial program loading [RIPL]
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/45533 Hypervisors; Virtual machine monitors
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/45558 Hypervisor-specific management and integration aspects
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/5061 Partitioning or combining of resources
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0639 Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/1053 Employment or hiring
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/018 Certifying business or products

Abstract

A novel automated system develops a uniform rating of screening practices of organizations/industry entities (IEs) in a given industry. The uniform rating is based upon objective employee screening practices during pre-employment screening. The system allows IEs to view employee screening parameters of their own records stored on the system, add information and update the values of these employee screening parameters. These records are also made available to all users. The system creates weighting factors based upon the relative importance of each employee screening parameters then creates the rating based upon a combination of the weighted employee screening practices used by an IE. This rating reflects an estimate of the completeness, or thoroughness of the employment screening practices of each IE which has a direct effect upon the quality of the employees hired and ultimately upon the quality of the products produced by these employees or the services rendered.

Claims

1. A system for selecting an industry entity (IE) based upon rating selected screening practices (SPs) of the IEs by a remote user employing a user communication device, comprising:

a controller;

wherein the user communication device is operably connected to the controller;

an IE storage device that can be accessed by a remote user through the user communication device and store, through the controller, values of employer'"'"'s screening practices of a plurality of Industry Entities (IEs);

a parameter storage device remotely accessible by the remote user through the user communication device having a prestored list of employer'"'"'s screening practices (SPs) to be used by the controller to determine a rating for a selected industry;

a weighting factor storage device capable of storing weighting factors (WFs) that each indicate an importance of each selected screening practice (SP);

the controller coupled to the IE storage device, the parameter storage device, and the weighting factor storage device, wherein the processor includes a set of instructions that when executed;

acquire a plurality of selected employer'"'"'s screening practices (SPs) from the parameter storage device;

acquire values of the plurality of selected employer'"'"'s screening practices from the IE storage device;

acquire corresponding weighting factors (WFs) from the weighting factor storage device 160;

determine a rating for each IE by summing each selected employer'"'"'s screening practice (SP) value multiplied by its corresponding weighting factor (WF);

electronically transmitting the rating to, and displaying the rating on the user communication device of the remote user; and

selecting, by the remote user, an IE based upon the rating.

2. The system of claim 1 further comprising a plurality of IE communication devices that communicate through the controller with the IE storage device, wherein each IE communication device:

requests from the IE storage device, information the IE storage device has stored relating to its corresponding IE;

stores missing values of the selected screening practices (SPs) relating to its corresponding IE in the IE storage device; and

updates existing values for the screening practices relating to its corresponding IE in the IE storage device.

3. The system of claim 1 further comprising a system administrator communication device that receives input from a systems administrator and provides this input to the controller to select screening practices (SPs) that will be compared in rating each IE.

4. The system of claim 3 wherein values of the selected screening practices (SPs) are stored in the IE storage device.

5. The system of claim 4 wherein the screening practices (SPs) comprise at least one of:

verification of past employment, verification of background, and drug screening tests.

6. A system for aiding a remote user in selecting an industry entity (IE) to employ based upon rating of the thoroughness of the screening practices (SPs) of IEs comprising:

a user communication device capable of receiving user input and communicating with remote computing devices;

a controller capable of communicating with the user communication device;

a parameter storage device having prestored selected screening practices (SPs) relevant to the current industry;

a weighting factor storage device capable of storing weighting factors (WFs) indicative of the importance of each of the selected screening practices (SPs);

an IE storage device capable of storing values for each of the selected screening practices (SPs) for each IE;

wherein the controller includes a set of instructions that when executed receives the selected screening practices (SPs) from the parameter storage device, the corresponding values for each selected screening practice (SP) from the IE storage, and the weighting factors (WFs) for each of the selected screening practice (SP) from the weighting factor storage device, multiplies the value for each screening practice (SP) by its corresponding weighting factor (WF) to create products for all selected screening practices (SPs), and sums all products to create a rating for each IE, and provides the ratings to the user communication device to display to the user aiding the user in selecting and hiring an IE.

7. The system of claim 6 wherein the weighting factor indicates the relative impact of the selected employer'"'"'s screening practice upon a quality measurement of an employment process of an IE.

8. The system of claim 6 wherein the values in the IE storage device are populated by the IEs interactively using IE communication devices.

9. The system of claim 6 wherein the selected screening practices are at least one of the group consisting of:

verification of past employment, verification of background, and drug screening test results.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein the selected screening practices relating to the verification of past employment further comprise at least one of the group consisting of:

employment eligibility (I9) verification, employment history verification, education verification, license verification, credentials verification, reference check, and social security verification.

11. The system of claim 9, wherein the selected screening practices relating to the verification of background further comprise at least one of the group consisting of:

state criminal background check, federal criminal background check, civil lawsuit check, credit history check, motor vehicle report, child abuse check, elder abuse check, national sex offender check, excluded parties list system (EPLS) check, list of excluded individuals/entities (LEIE) check, and tuberculosis testing.

12. The system of claim 9, wherein the selected screening practices relating to the verification of drug screening test results further comprise at least one of the group consisting of:

pre-employment drug testing, post-injury drug testing, random drug testing, and reasonable suspicion drug testing.

13. A system to objectively create and publish a rating of employment screening practices (SPs) of industry entities (IE) to a user aiding the user in hiring an IE, comprising:

a parameter storage device having a plurality of pre-stored employment screening practices (SPs) which are relevant to a given industry;

a weighting factor storage device for storing weighting factors (WFs) each indicating a relative importance with each associated selected screening practice (SPs);

an IE storage device for storing a value for each selected screening practices (SPs) indicating those screening practices (SPs) that are currently being performed by each of the IEs;

industry entity communication devices coupled to the controller, which communicate information between Industry Entities (IEs) and the IE storage device through the controller;

wherein the controller multiplies each of the (WFs) in the weighting factor storage device 160 by the values of their corresponding (SPs) in parameter storage device 170 and sums these products for all selected screening practices (SPs) to result in the rating of each IE that is stored in the IE storage device, that is used by user to hire an IE.

14. The system of claim 13 wherein the weighting factor synthesis device 260 creates weighting factors based upon survey data of experts in the field.

15. The system of claim 13, wherein the weighting factor synthesis device creates weighting factors (WFs) based upon a database having a listing of persons that were disciplined and reasons for the discipline of each person.

16. The system of claim 13, wherein the weighting factor synthesis device creates weighting factors based upon published articles indicating the relative importance of various screening practices.

17. The system of claim 13, further comprising:

at least one industry entity communication device that communicates through the controller with the IE storage device allowing the industry entity communication device of an IE to read, change or delete its own information on IE storage device.

18. The system of claim 13, further comprising:

at least user communication device 243 that communicates through the controller with the IE storage device allowing the user communication device 243 to read information of the IEs on IE storage device.

19. The system of claim 13, wherein the controller further comprises:

a parameter selection device 230 coupled to the parameter storage device 170, that receives input from the system administrator 7, selects screening practices (SPs) relevant to a selected industry and stores the selected screening practices in the parameter storage device 170.

20. The system of claim 13 wherein the controller comprises:

a weighting factor synthesis device 260 that receives input relating to a relative importance of each of the selected screening practices (SPs) and generates weighting factors (WFs) for each of the selected screening practices (SPs) indicating their relative importance and stores them in the weighting factor storage 160.