System for pollution suppression

• US 4,204,955 A
• Filed: 04/25/1978
• Issued: 05/27/1980
• Est. Priority Date: 09/24/1975
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Edward T. Armstrong
• Original Assignee: Edward T. Armstrong
• Inventors: Armstrong, Edward T.
• Primary Examiner(s): Spitzer, Robert H.
• Application Number:
  US05/898,484
• Time in Patent Office: 763 Days
• Field of Search: 55/71, 204/76, 210/49, 210/50, 210/53, 210/62, 210/63 Z, 210/63 R, 210/64, 210/192, 210/61
• US Class Current: 210/760
• CPC Class Codes: C02F 1/78 with ozone C02F1/4672 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: C02F 3/1294 "Venturi" aeration means
• CPC Class Codes: Y02W 10/10 Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage

Abstract

A process wherein air, oxygen-enriched gas, or oxygen is ozonated by an ozone generator operating at reduced flow rate with the result being an increased concentration of ozone being produced. The ozone is fed to a fluid dispersing system containing a flat plate orifice which creates a downstream vena contracta. Addition of the ozonated gas into the vena contracta produces a highly efficient mixing device.

Claims

1. A process for producing, injecting, and dispersing an ozonated oxygen containing gas into a fluid, comprising the steps of:

adding a feed gas selected from the class consisting of air, oxygen-enriched air, and oxygen, to an ozone generator at a reduced feed gas flow rate compared to an ozonator feed gas rate corresponding to a maximum ozone production rate, said reduced feed gas flow rate being associated with reduced efficiency of ozone production as measured by the criteria of pounds of ozone produced per kilowatt hour of ozonator energy expended, the concentration of produced ozone in said feed gas being relatively increased to levels greater than the concentration typical of either said ozone production at maximum rates or at maximum ozone production rate per unit of ozonator energy expended;

creating a downstream vena contracta portion by a constriction in a conduit, said constriction being a flat plate orifice, said flat plate orifice having a diameter ranging from about 0.7 to about 0.9 conduit diameters, said flat plate orifice also creating said vena contracta portion from about 0.25 to about 0.5 conduit diameters downstream from said orifice;

injecting said ozonated feed gas into said conduit in said vena contracta portion; and

injecting said ozonated feed gas at a flow rate such that the concentration of said ozone in said fluid is at least 0.5 parts per million.

2. A process according to claim 1, including an injection tube, said injection tube extending through said flat plate orifice, and

feeding said ozonated feed gas into said injection tube.

3. A process according to claim 2, wherein said injection tube has a tip, and said tip extends into said vena contracta portion.

4. A process according to claim 2, or claim 3, including locating a second dispersing system at least 25 downstream.

5. A process according to claim 4, wherein said second dispersing system is a hyperbolic diffuser.

6. A process according to claim 1, or claim 3, wherein said fed gas is air, and wherein said air after ozonation contains, by volume, about 79 percent nitrogen, about 19 or 20 percent oxygen, about 1 percent argon, and wherein the amount of ozone produced ranges from an amount slightly higher than that produced at said ozone generator operating at a maximum production rate or at a maximum production rate per unit of ozonator energy expended to about 2.5 percent.

7. A process according to claim 6, wherein said amount of ozone produced at said maximum production rate is about 1.0 percent.

8. A process according to claim 1, or claim 3, wherein said feed gas is oxygen, and wherein said air after ozonation contains, by volume, about 79 percent nitrogen, about 18 or 20 percent oxygen, about 1 percent argon, and wherein the amount of ozone produced ranges from an amount slightly higher than that produced at said ozone generator operating at a maximum production rate or at a maximum production rate per unit of ozonator energy expended to about 6.0 percent.

9. A process according to claim 8, wherein the amount of ozone produced at said maximum production rate is about 2.1 percent.

10. A process according to claim 1, or claim 3, wherein said fluid is substantially water, and including injecting said ozonated feed gas wherein said feed gas is an oxygen feed gas at a rate to said fluid at or less than the saturation feed rate for any one of said components of said feed gas.

11. A process according to claim 1, or claim 3, wherein said fluid is substantially water, and including injecting said ozonated feed gas wherein said feed gas is an oxygen feed gas at a rate to said fluid at or less than the saturation feed rate for said oxygen component of said feed gas which is at a rate such that said fluid contains 2.42 parts per million or less of ozone.

12. A process according to claim 1, or claim 3, wherein said fluid is substantially water, and including injecting said ozonated feed gas wherein said feed gas is an oxygen feed gas at a rate to said fluid at or less than the saturation feed rate for said ozone component of said feed gas which is at a rate such that said fluid contains 50 parts per million or less of ozone.

13. A process according to claim 1, or claim 3, wherein said fluid is substantially water, and including injecting said ozonated feed gas at a rate to said fluid at or less than the saturation feed rate for said argon component of said feed gas which is at a rate such that said fluid contains 300 parts per million or less of argon.

14. A process according to claim 1, or claim 3, wherein said fluid is substantially water, and including injecting said ozonated feed gas wherein said feed gas is an air feed gas at a rate to said fluid at or less than the saturation feed rate for any one of said components of said feed gas.

15. A process according to claim 1, or claim 3, wherein said fluid is substantially water, and including injecting said ozonated feed gas wherein said feed gas is an air feed gas at a rate to said fluid at or less than the saturation feed rate for said oxygen component of said feed gas which is at a rate such that said fluid contains 1.125 parts per million or less of ozone.

16. A process according to claim 1, or claim 3, wherein said fluid is substantially water, and including injecting said ozonated feed gas wherein said feed gas is an air feed gas at a rate to said fluid at or less than the saturation feed rate for said ozone component of said feed gas which is at a rate such that said fluid contains 12 parts per million or less of ozone.

17. A process according to claim 1, or claim 3, wherein said fluid is substantially water, and including injecting said ozonated feed gas wherein said feed gas is an air feed gas at a rate to said fluid at or less than the saturation feed rate for said argon component of said feed gas which is at a rate such that said fluid contains 30 parts per million or less of ozone.

18. A process according to claim 1, or claim 3, wherein said fluid is substantially water, and including injecting said ozonated feed gas wherein said feed gas is an air feed gas at a rate to said fluid at or less than the saturation feed rate for said nitrogen component of said feed gas which is at a rate such that said fluid contains 0.57 parts per million or less of ozone.