Train vehicle control microprocessor power reset

• US 4,247,897 A
• Filed: 10/25/1979
• Issued: 01/27/1981
• Est. Priority Date: 10/25/1979
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation
• Original Assignee: Westinghouse Electric Company LLC (Brookfield Asset Management Incorporated)
• Inventors: Anderson, Larry W., McDonald, Michael P.
• Primary Examiner(s): Wise, Edward J.
• Application Number:
  US06/088,246
• Time in Patent Office: 460 Days
• Field of Search: 364/436, 364/424, 364/200, 364/300, 364/551, 246/5
• US Class Current: 701/117
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 27/57 for vehicles or trains, e.g. trackside supervision of train conditions

Abstract

There is disclosed a passenger vehicle operation control apparatus and method including program microprocessor control apparatus for providing a dynamic output signal when the microprocessor completes a predetermined main computer control program subroutine and this dynamic output signal operates with a hardware logic circuit apparatus including a timing circuit such that a repetition rate in excess of that required to keep the timing circuit reset is required, otherwise the computer control program is reinitialized.

Claims

1. In apparatus for determining the desired performance of a vehicle, the combination of

means for providing a first operation periodically executing a sequence of steps in relation to said desired performance of the vehicle and developing an output signal for each periodic completion of the sequence of steps and for providing a second operation effecting a predetermined reinitialization of said first operation,

means responsive to the respective output signals being developed at an actual repetition rate in accordance with each periodic completion of the sequence of steps for selecting one of the first operation and the second operation by a comparison of said actual repetition rate with a predetermined reference repetition rate, and

means responsive to each periodic execution of the sequence of steps for providing said desired performance of the vehicle.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, with said apparatus being operative with a power supply and with said reference repetition rate being predetermined such that a power supply failure will result in the actual repetition rate being less than the reference repetition rate.

3. The apparatus of claim 1,

with said selection means being operative to select the second operation when the actual repetition rate is less than the reference repetition rate.

4. The apparatus of claim 1,

with said selection means being operative to select the first operation while the actual repetition rate remains greater than the reference repetition rate.

5. The apparatus of claim 1, with said first and second operation providing means including at least one digital computer device operative with a control program defining said sequence of steps,

said digital computer device developing said output signal for each first operation periodic execution of that control program, and

with said selection means including a hardware logic circuit responsive to the occurrence of said output signal at a repetition rate in excess of the reference repetition rate for selecting the first operation periodic execution of that control program.

6. The apparatus of claim 1,

with one step in said sequence of steps being to develop said output signal during each periodic execution of that sequence of steps.

7. The method of controlling a vehicle, including the steps of

providing a sequence of control operations for said vehicle during each of successive time periods,

providing an output signal in relation to the completion of said sequence of control operations during each of said successive time periods,

sensing the actual repetition rate of the provided output signals for comparison with an established reference repetition rate,

providing an initialization of said sequence of control operations in accordance with a predetermined relationship between the actual repetition rate and the reference repetition rate, and

controlling the vehicle in response to said sequence of control operations.

8. The method of claim 7,

with said predetermined relationship being that the actual repetition rate is less than the reference repetition rate.