Failure detection and correction system for redundant control elements

• US 4,260,942 A
• Filed: 04/17/1978
• Issued: 04/07/1981
• Est. Priority Date: 04/17/1978
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: TRW Limited (Zeppelin - Stiftung der Stadt Friedrichshafen)
• Original Assignee: TRW Limited (Zeppelin - Stiftung der Stadt Friedrichshafen)
• Inventors: Fleming, Alan W.
• Primary Examiner(s): Truhe, J. V.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Indyk, Eugene S.
• Application Number:
  US05/897,072
• Time in Patent Office: 1,086 Days
• Field of Search: 318/564, 318/565, 318/648, 318/649, 244/165, 244/194
• US Class Current: 318/565
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2300/07 Off-road vehicles
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2400/208 of wheel rotation
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2600/08 Failure or malfunction detecting means
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2600/086 Redundant systems
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2800/952 Electronic driving torque distribution
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 9/03 with multiple-channel loop, i.e. redundant control systems
• CPC Class Codes: G05D 1/0077 using redundant signals or controls

Abstract

Apparatus and a related method for detecting failures of control elements, such as skewed-axis reaction wheels with closed-loop speed control, used in satellite attitude control systems, and for compensating for such failures and thereby maintaining continuity of operation. The apparatus includes a wheel loop model for simulating operation of each of the reaction wheels and speed control loops in the satellite, and for deriving an estimated wheel speed from a command speed for each wheel. By comparing the estimated speed of each wheel with the corresponding actual or observed speed, the apparatus determines whether a failure was occurred in the wheel, or in its control loop. Upon detection of such a failure, the apparatus disconnects driving power from the failed wheel, modifies the corresponding wheel loop model to reflect disconnection of power, and reconfigures a distribution matrix in such a manner that a set of desired momentum commands with respect to the vehicle axes is properly redistributed among the remaining reaction wheels. Compensation is also made for the momentum contributions of failed wheels that continue to spin after being powered down.

Claims

1. For use in a control system having a plurality of control elements of the type that may contribute control forces even after failure, at least one of the control elements being redundant, apparatus for detecting control element failure, said apparatus comprising:

control element modeling means, for simulating operation of the control elements and generating an estimated value of a performance parameter for each control element;

measuring means for obtaining an observed value of the performance parameter for each control element;

failure determination means for comparing said estimated performance parameter with said observed performance parameter and determining whether a control element failure has occurred; and

control means responsive to detection of a failure by said failure determination means, for deactivating the failed control element and for modifying said control element modeling means to take the failure into account.

2. Apparatus as set forth in claim 1, and further including means for compensating for a failure to ensure continuing performance of the apparatus after deactivation of a failed control element.

3. Apparatus as set forth in claim 2, wherein said means for compensating for a failure includes means for compensating for the continuing effect of a failed control element after its deactivation.

4. For use in a vehicle attitude control system having a plurality of control elements of the type that may contribute control forces even after failure, at least one of the control elements being redundant, control element failure detection and compensation apparatus, comprising:

distribution matrix means for distributing to the plurality of control elements a like plurality of control signals derived from a set of attitude commands relating to a corresponding set of axes of the vehicle;

control element modeling means coupled to said distribution matrix means, for simulating operation of the control elements and generating an estimated value of a performance parameter for each control element;

measuring means for obtaining an observed value of the performance parameter for each control element;

failure determination means for comparing said estimated performance parameter with said observed performance parameter and determining whether a control element failure has occurred;

means responsive to detection of a failure by said failure determination means, for deactivating the failed control element and for modifying said control element modeling means to take the failure into account; and

means for automatically compensating for a failure to ensure continuing performance of the apparatus after deactivation of a failed control element.

5. Control element failure detection and compensation apparatus as set forth in claim 4, wherein said means for automatically compensating for a failure includes means for modifying said distribution matrix means to properly distribute control signals to only the remaining control elements.

6. Control element failure detection and compensation apparatus as set forth in claim 5, wherein said means for automatically compensating for a failure includes means for compensating for the continuing effect of a failed control element after its deactivation.

7. Control element failure detection and compensation apparatus as set forth in claim 4, wherein:

said control elements are reaction wheels driven by speed-controlled motors;

the performance parameter for each of said reaction wheels is its speed of rotation; and

said distribution matrix means distributes speed control signals to said speed-controlled motors.

8. Control element failure detection and compensation apparatus as set forth in claim 7, wherein said means for automatically compensating for a failure includes:

means for reconfiguring said distribution matrix means to exclude the failed wheel and distribute speed control signals to the remaining wheels; and

means for compensating for the continuing effect of the failed wheel and its momentum contribution to the attitude of the vehicle.

9. Control element failure detection and compensation apparatus as set forth in claim 7, wherein said failure determination means includes:

subtraction means for computing the difference between the estimated and observed values of wheel speed; and

means for determining whether the difference has exceeded a preselected threshold for a preselected time.

10. For use in a satellite attitude control system having a plurality of speed-controlled, skewed-axis reaction wheels, means for sensing attitude, means for deriving angular momentum commands for three vehicle axes from the sensed attitude and from attitude commands, and distribution matrix means for distributing the angular momentum commands among the reaction wheels, failure detection and compensation apparatus comprising:

wheel loop modeling means for each speed-controlled reaction wheel, for receiving speed command signals from the distribution matrix means, and for generating therefrom an estimated speed signal for each wheel;

means for obtaining a speed error signal from the difference between said estimated speed signal and a signal representative of the observed speed of the corresponding reaction wheel;

failure determination means, for determining whether a failure has occurred by monitoring said error signal;

means responsive to the detection of a reaction wheel failure, for deactivating the failed wheel and for modifying said wheel loop modeling means to simulate deactivation of the failed wheel; and

means also responsive to the detection of a reaction wheel failure, for reconfiguring the distribution matrix means to exclude the failed wheel.

11. Failure detection and compensation apparatus as set forth in claim 10, wherein said means for determining whether a failure has occurred includes means for determining whether said error signal has exceeded a preselected threshold value for a preselected time.

12. Failure detection and compensation apparatus as set forth in claim 10, and further including:

means for resolving the momentum contributions of failed wheels along the three vehicle axes; and

means for subtracting these momentum contributions from corresponding momentum commands in the three vehicle axes, before application to the distribution matrix means.

13. Failure detection and compensation apparatus as set forth in claim 12, wherein said wheel loop modeling means includes, for each wheel loop:

means for obtaining a speed loop error signal by subtracting said estimated speed from said speed command signal; and

means for integrating said speed loop error signal and dividing by the moment of inertia of the wheel to obtain the estimated speed signal.

14. Failure detection and compensation apparatus as set forth in claim 13, wherein said wheel loop modeling means further includes:

drive motor simulation means, to make allowance for a torque-limited drive motor; and

friction and windage simulation means, to derive drag torques due to friction and windage as functions of speed, and to subtract these drag torques from the torque-limited motor drive torque, before application to said means for integrating said speed loop error signal.

15. A skewed-axis reaction wheel satellite attitude control system, comprising:

means for sensing attitude with respect to three orthogonal vehicle axes;

at least four speed-controlled reaction wheels having axes skewed to the vehicle axes;

means for generating a set of three vehicle-axis angular momentum commands from the sensed attitude and attitude commands;

a wheel-speed distribution matrix for transforming said set of three momentum commands into a set of at least four wheel speed commands to effect the three momentum commands;

at least four wheel loop models for simulating operation of said speed-controlled reaction wheels, and generating estimated wheel speeds from said wheel speed commands;

speed measuring means for obtaining the actual speeds of said reaction wheels;

subtraction means for determining the speed differences between corresponding actual and estimated wheel peeds;

failure criterion means for generating a failed-wheel condition if any of said speed differences has exceeded a preselected threshold for a preselected time;

first means responsive to a failed-wheel condition, for deactivating the appropriate one of said reaction wheels, modifying the appropriate one of said wheel loop models to reflect such deactivation, and reconfiguring said distribution matrix to exclude the failed wheel and thereby distribute wheel speed commands to the remaining wheels; and

second means responsive to a failed-wheel condition, for resolving the momentum contributions of all failed wheels in the three vehicle axes, and for subtracting the resolved momentum contributions from corresponding vehicle-axis momentum commands, before distribution by said distribution matrix.

16. A skewed-axis satelllite attitude control system as set forth in claim 15, wherein each of said wheel loop models includes:

means for obtaining a speed loop error signal by subtracting the estimated speed from the commanded speed; and

means for integrating said speed loop error signal and dividing by the moment of inertia of the wheel to obtain the estimated speed.

17. A skewed-axis satellite attitude control system as set forth in claim 16, wherein each of said wheel loop models further includes:

drive motor simulation means, to make allowance for a torque-limited drive motor; and

friction and windage simulation means, to derive drag torques due to friction and windage as functions of speed, and to subtract these drag torques from the torque-limited motor drive torque, before application to said means for integrating said speed loop error signal.

18. For use in a control system having a plurality of control elements of the type that may contribute control forces even after failure, at least one of the control elements being redundant, a method of detecting control element failure, said method comprising the steps of:

simulating operation of the control elements and thereby generating an estimated value of a performance parameter for each control element;

measuring the performance parameter for each control element to obtain an observed value thereof;

comparing the estimated performance parameter with the observed performance parameter;

determining whether a control element failure has occurred;

deactivating the failed control element upon detection of a failure; and

modifying performance of said simulating step to take the failure into account.

19. A method as set forth in claim 18, and further including the step of compensating for a detected failure, to ensure continuing performance of the control system after deactivation of a failed control element.

20. A method as set forth in claim 19, wherein said compensating step includes compensating for the continuing effect of a failed control element after its deactivation.

21. For use in a vehicle attitude control system having a plurality of control elements of the type that may contribute control forces even after failure, at least one of the control elements being redundant, a method of control element failure detection and compensation, said method comprising the steps of:

distributing to the plurality of control elements a like plurality of control signals derived from a set of attitude commands relating to a corresponding set of axes of the vehicle;

simulating operation of the control elements and thereby generating an estimated value of a performance parameter for each control element;

measuring the performance parameter for each control element to obtain an observed value thereof;

comparing the estimated performance parameter with the observed performance parameter;

determining whether a control element failure has occurred;

deactivating the failed control element upon detection of a failure;

modifying performance of said simulating step upon detection of a failure, to take the failure into account; and

compensating for a failure to ensure continuing performance of the control system after deactivation of a failed control element.

22. A method of control element failure detection and compensation as set forth in claim 21, wherein said step of compensating for a failure includes modifying said distributing step to properly distribute control signals to only the remaining control elements.

23. A method of control element failure detection and compensation as set forth in claim 22, wherein said step of compensating for a failure further includes compensating for the continuing effect of a failed control element after its deactivation.

24. A method of control element failure detection and compensation as set forth in claim 23, wherein:

the control elements are reaction wheels driven by speed-controlled motors;

the performance parameter for each of said reaction wheels is its speed of rotation; and

said distributing step distributes speed control signals to the speed-controlled motors.

25. A method of control element failure detection and compensation as set forth in claim 24, wherein said step of compensating for a failure includes:

reconfiguring a distribution matrix to exclude the failed wheel and thereby distribute speed control signals to the remaining wheels; and

compensating for the continuing effect of the failed wheel and its momentum contribution to the attitude of the vehicle.

26. A method of control element failure detection and compensation as set forth in claim 24, wherein said step of detecting whether a failure has occurred includes:

computing the magnitude of the difference between the estimated and observed values of wheel speed; and

determining whether the difference has exceeded a preselected threshold for a preselected time.

27. For use in a satellite attitude control system having a plurality of speed-controlled, skewed-axis reaction wheels, means for sensing attitude, means for deriving angular momentum commands for three vehicle axes from the sensed attitude and from attitude commands, and distribution matrix means for distributing the angular momentum commands among the reaction wheels, a method of wheel failure detection and compensation, comprising the steps of:

receiving speed command signals from the distribution matrix means;

simulating operation of each speed-controlled reaction wheel, and generating therefrom an estimated speed signal for each wheel;

measuring the actual speed of each reaction wheel;

obtaining a speed error signal from the difference between the estimated speed signal and a signal representative of the actual speed of the corresponding reaction wheel;

determining whether a failure has occurred by monitoring the speed error signal;

deactivating the failed wheel upon detection of a failure;

modifying said simulating step to simulate deactivation of the failed wheel; and

reconfiguring the distribution matrix means to exclude the failed wheel upon detection of a failure.

28. A methid of failure detection and compensation as set forth in claim 27, wherein said determining step includes determining whether the speed error signal has exceeded a preselected threshold value for a preselected time.

29. A method of failure detection and compensation as set forth in claim 27, and further including:

resolving the momentum contributions of failed wheels along the three vehicle axes; and

subtracting these momentum contributions from corresponding momentum commands in the three vehicle axes, before application to the distribution matrix means.

30. A method of failure detection and compensation as set forth in claim 29, wherein said simulating step includes, for each wheel loop simulation, the steps of:

obtaining a speed loop error signal by subtracting the estimated speed signal from the speed command signal; and

integrating the speed loop error signal and dividing by the moment of inertia of the wheel to obtain the estimated speed signal.

31. A method of failure detection and compensation as set forth in claim 30, wherein said simulating step further includes, for each wheel loop simulation, the steps of:

compensating for a torque-limited wheel drive motor;

deriving drag torques due to friction and windage as functions of speed; and

subtracting these drag torques from the torque-limited motor drive torque, before performance of said integrating step.