Self tuning of P-I-D controller by conversion of discrete time model identification parameters

• US 4,407,013 A
• Filed: 10/20/1980
• Issued: 09/27/1983
• Est. Priority Date: 10/20/1980
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Leeds & Northrup Co.
• Original Assignee: Leeds & Northrup Co.
• Inventors: Anderson, Paul, Arcara, Samuel A.
• Primary Examiner(s): Ruggiero, Joseph F.
• Application Number:
  US06/198,804
• Time in Patent Office: 1,072 Days
• Field of Search: 364/149, 364/150, 364/151, 364/157, 364/162, 318/561, 318/609, 318/610
• US Class Current: 700/29
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 13/04 involving the use of models or simulators

Abstract

A P-I-D controller in a process control system is self tuned in response to discrete time model identification parameters which are converted to P-I-D form.

Additionally, the P-I-D parameters are limited to prevent them from exceeding the controller'"'"'s specified range.

Claims

1. In a method for controlling a process of the type which includes generating a signal which corresponds to a selected set point, providing a continuously tunable controller of the type which has at least a variable integral and a variable differential characteristic wherein said characteristics vary in response to a first set of parameters having a first form, and wherein said tunable controller controls a process and a variable process model and wherein said variable process model is responsive to a second set of parameters having a second form, and means are provided for varying said second set of parameters, the improvement comprising

providing means for changing the form of said second set of parameters to the form of said first set of parameters and using said last named set of parameters to individually control each of the characteristics of said tunable controller.

2. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein said controller is responsive to a signal having the form ##EQU5## wherein e(t)=deviation signal that corresponds to the difference between the set point signal and the process variable signal

(100/K_p)=constant corresponding to the proportional band for said controller in percent

T_i =constant corresponding to the frequency of the reset of the process in repeats per minute

T_d =constant corresponding to the rate at which the controller output is varied in response to e(t).

3. The method as defined in claim 2 wherein the output signal of the process model at any time has the form

4. The method of claim 3 wherein a signal corresponding to the value of (100/K_p) has the form ##EQU6## in which T_p =the selected process response time, and

T_m =the rate at which said process model operates.

5. The method of claim 3 wherein a signal corresponding to the value of (1/T_i) has the form ##EQU7## in which T_m =the rate at which said process model operates.

6. The method of claim 3 wherein a signal corresponding to the value of T_d has the form ##EQU8## in which T_m =the rate at which said process model operates.

7. The method as defined in claim 1 including the step of operating said process model at a rate which is different than the rate at which said controller operates.

8. The method as defined in claim 7 in which said process model operating rate is less than said controller operating rate and said model operating rate is varied in proportion to a desired closed loop response time of said process to a change in said set point.

9. The method as defined in claim 8 wherein said proportion is an integer which is a ratio of said closed loop response time for said process and the operating rate of said controller.

10. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein the signals corresponding to the values of said parameters are compared with reference signals corresponding to predetermined maximum and minimum values, and signals between said maximum and minimum values are applied to said controller.

11. The method as defined in claim 10 wherein said reference signal having said maximum value is applied to said controller when the value of said signals corresponding to said parameters exceeds said maximum values.

12. The method as defined in claim 10 wherein said reference signal having said minimum values is applied to said controller when the value of said signals corresponding to said parameters falls below said minimum value.

13. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein said means for changing said parameters is responsive to a selected closed loop response time.

14. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein means are provided for identifying said second set of parameters, and said last named means is disabled when said process is operating within predefined limits relative to said set point.