Remote simulation by remote control from a computer desk

• US 4,456,994 A
• Filed: 12/10/1981
• Issued: 06/26/1984
• Est. Priority Date: 01/31/1979
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: US Philips Corporation (Koninklijke Philips N.V.)
• Original Assignee: US Philips Corporation (Koninklijke Philips N.V.)
• Inventors: Segarra, Gerard
• Primary Examiner(s): Malzahn, David H.
• Application Number:
  US06/329,377
• Time in Patent Office: 929 Days
• Field of Search: 371/16, 371/17, 371/18, 364/200
• US Class Current: 714/33
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/261 by simulating additional hardware, e.g. fault simulation

Abstract

A data processing system, comprising several distributed processing units which are connected to a remote central monitor and test station in which the state of each distributed processing unit is monitored by the transmission of test and diagnostic signals. Each processing unit comprises a simulation unit which comprises a microprocessor and test sequences for decoding and simulating these commands and, after their execution by the central unit of the processing unit, for transmitting the results to the central station for analysis. Moreover, the simulation unit is capable of detecting errors in the simulation and the execution of the commands and of supplying the central station with a warning.

Claims

1. A data processing system (DPU) having a plurality of distributed data processing units interconnected to a remote central test and monitor station, said central test and monitor station having sending means for successively sending a first series of specific commands to a distributed data processing unit, each distributed data processing unit having

(a) a control panel,

(b) processing means for processing instructions of a standard instruction set,

(c) a simulation unit having

(c1) storage means for receiving and storing said first series of specific commands emanated from said central test and monitor station as diagnostic commands, including such diagnostic commands for the diagnostics of the control panel, to be processed in said processing means in lieu of instructions from said standard instruction set,

(c2) a microprogrammed logic unit interconnecting said storage means and said processing means for decoding each diagnostic command, as a sequence of at least one microinstruction to be stepwise processed in said processing means (CDCS),

(c3) modifying means connected to said storage means and said microprogrammed logic unit under control of an external signal for modifying the storage content of said storage means and/or a decoding function in said microprogrammed logic unit to effect storing and execution of a second series of specific commands as diagnostic commands, which second series is different from said first series of specific commands,

(c4) transmitting means for transmitting a processing result of processing a specific command of either said first or said second series to said central test and monitor station,

and wherein said central test and monitor station has furthermore testing and monitoring means for testing and monitoring a processing result received from a distributed data processing unit.

2. A system as claimed in claim 1, wherein said processing means comprise a microprocessor, said storage means comprise a first random access memory, and said logic unit comprises a first programmable read-only memory, for cooperatively decoding a command received while sequentially accessing test sequence elements stored in said programmable read-only memory, said storage means furthermore comprise data storage elements for loading accessed test sequence elements, data elements, addresses and input parameters according to a command test sequence proper to each command, said storage means comprise a second random access memory and said logic unit comprises a second programmable read-only memory in combination with said microprocessor for cooperatively testing the loading in said data storage elements (CCS), analyzing and testing processing results of processing a specific command according to an output test sequence (OCS), and activating said transmitting means for transmitting a processing result to said central test and monitor station, said data storage elements comprise a first FIFO-buffer for said accessed test sequence elements, a second FIFO-buffer for data elements and input parameters, a third FIFO-buffer for address parameters, and a fourth FIFO-buffer for output parameters, outputs of said buffers being connected to said first and second programmable read-only memories and said microprocessor for forwarding thereto an information content to be tested, and wherein said simulation unit furthermore has a state sequencer means having a plurality of programmable-logic-array-induced states for controlling state-by-state the presentation of bit patterns to said processing means and the outputting of processing result bit patterns therefrom to said fourth FIFO-buffer.

3. A system as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that said CDCS first of all tests the programmed commands "LOCK" and "UNLOCK", said status sequencer proceeding to the state "UNLOCK" if the command "UNLOCK" is decoded, all subsequent commands decoded in said state "UNLOCK" being immediately simulated, said status sequencer proceeding to the state "LOCK" if said command "LOCK" is decoded, all subsequent decoded commands in said state "LOCK" being stored, said CDCS performing either a test for other commands if neither the command "UNLOCK" nor the command "LOCK" is at least partly decoded by the first one of the two characters defining the command (CDC), or performing a jump to the state READY if the one or the other of the two commands is decoded, or if a starting character or an address character is incorrect, or if the second one of said CDC of the commands "UNLOCK" or "LOCK" is incorrect, said CDCS recommencing the decoding of the next command received in said state "READY".

4. A system as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that said status sequencer is always in the state "LOCK" if a command "UNLOCK" is not decoded by said CDCS, the simulation of all other decoded commands in this implicit "LOCK" state being postponed until the decoding of a programmed command "UNLOCK".

5. A system as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that said CDCS decodes the other relevant commands according to a specified procedure where said CDC is successively tested for each of said other commands, said CDCS either jumping to the preceding CCS, defined by said first decoded CDC, or successively testing the second CDC for the total decoding of the other commands, as defined by said first decoded CDC, or returning to said state "READY" if said first CDC cannot be decoded, the decoding of the commands recommencing in said state READY.

6. A system as claimed in claim 5, characterized in that said CDCS either jumps to the relevant CCS defined by said second CDC decoded, or returns to the state READY if said second CDC cannot be decoded.

7. A system as claimed in the claim 5 characterized in that said CDCS always returns to the state "READY", either directly after a jump to the CCS defined by said second decoded CDC, or after the testing of said second CDC during a jump to a relevant CCS defined by said first decoded CDC.

8. A system as claimed in the claim 5 characterized in that the decoded CCS stores said decoded commands in said first FIFO, the command and data parameters in said second FIFO, and the address parameters in said third FIFO, said status sequencer directly simulating the commands if it is in the state "UNLOCK".

9. A system as claimed in claim 8, characterized in that the simulation of said decoded commands in said first, second and third FIFO is not performed if said status sequencer is in the state "LOCK", said CCS then jumping to the waiting state "ACT" where they can store the other decoded commands.

10. A system as claimed in claim 9, characterized in that the simulation of said stored commands commences as soon as a command "UN-LOCK" is decoded, said simulation being realized in the order of storage.

11. A system as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that said OCS, in combination with said CCS, tests the correct transmission of the results of the executed commands, said OCS analyzing the executed command, transferring the testing to the correct CCS and testing the transmission of said results, stored by said CCS in said RAM, to the CPCS, said CCS already having loaded said results of said fourth FIFO in said RAM.

12. A system as claimed in claim 11, characterized in that the decoding of commands in said CDCS, said OCS, said CCS and said command simulations take place simultaneously and synchronously, the synchronization being tested by interrupts and interdependent logic states.

13. A system as claimed in claim 12, characterized in that said test means are capable of detecting whether a command has not been correctly executed, said test means erasing the relevant command from the list of commands for execution and inhibiting the transmission of the CDC and the results of said command to the CPCS.

14. A system as claimed in claim 13, characterized in that said test means simulate the commands and transmit the results of their execution to the central test and monitor station (CPCS) in the order in which they have been received from the CPCS.

15. A system as claimed in claim 14, characterized in that said series of commands enables said CPCS to perform diagnostic and test operations on said DPU, said operations involving means for loading and reading the relevant registers, for loading and reading the relevant memory locations, for interrupting current programs, for loading and executing test and diagnosis programs, for executing the current program one instruction after the other, for resetting the correct elements to 0 and for reading the status word of said DPU.

16. A system as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that said system further comprises direct access memory means for transmitting memory blocks from the memory of said DPU to said CPCS, said direct access memory means controlling said transmission of the memory block upon reception of a command.

17. A system as claimed in claim 16, characterized in that said system includes means to modify said specific series of commands in order to define new series of commands by modification of said test sequences stored in said memory PROM and said state sequencer means.