Bidirectional, interactive fire detection system

• US 4,470,047 A
• Filed: 02/04/1982
• Issued: 09/04/1984
• Est. Priority Date: 02/04/1982
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: ADT Security Services Incorporated (Apollo Global Management, Inc.), Borg-Warner Security Corporation
• Original Assignee: Baker Industries, Inc. (Lincoln Electric Holdings Incorporated)
• Inventors: Wynne, John M., Vogt, William R.
• Primary Examiner(s): YUSKO, DONALD
• Application Number:
  US06/345,909
• Time in Patent Office: 943 Days
• Field of Search: 340/825.36, 340/825.54, 340/825.57, 340/825.06, 340/825.07, 340/501, 340/505, 340/506, 340/511, 340/537, 340/590, 340/593, 340/661, 340/870.04 , 340/870.09, 340/870.17, 340/870.18, 340/870.38, 340/870.13, 370/13
• US Class Current: 340/10.1
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 17/00 Fire alarms; Alarms responsive to explosion
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 25/04 using a single signalling line, e.g. in a closed loop

Abstract

A communication system useful for fire detection which transfers data/commands bidirectionally between a controller and connected transponders on a real time, interactive basis. This system makes possible accurate data recovery, whether a transponder has its output shorted, or although multiple transponders are replying and makes possible the remote determination and constant monitoring of transducer sensitivity, at the controller. The sensitivity can be adjusted remotely at the controller, and different transducers can have different thresholds simultaneously, which can be changed collectively or individually to different settings manually or automatically at the controller. The system transmits reference data for supervision of system accuracy. Compensation for long-term changes is provided for both transponders and reducers in this system.

Claims

1. A bidirectional, interactive communication system, comprising a controller connected to transmit a series of signal groups sequentially over a pair of electrical conductors, wherein each signal group includes a plurality of pulses, and a plurality of transponders coupled to said conductors, at least one of said transponders having means for replying to the controller by selectively modifying a portion of at least one pulse transmitted by the controller and thus encoding information on said one pulse, which reply is terminated by the controller with an overriding simultaneous transmission,

wherein the controller includes means for sampling the pulse modified by the replying transponder at regular intervals to decode the information encoded on said modified pulse, and for providing an answer signal denoting said information.

2. A communication system as claimed in claim 1, in which the sampling of the modified pulses is conducted at a reference frequency over a sampling period, and means is provided for increasing the sampling rate to a second frequency higher than the reference frequency over a limited time interval which is substantially shorter than the sampling period, to enhance the accuracy of the answer signal without necessitating sampling at the higher frequency during the entire sampling period.

3. A communication system as claimed in claim 2, in which the higher sampling rate is utilized at the beginning of the modified pulse, and in a central portion of the modified pulse.

4. A communication system as claimed in claim 1, in which each pulse in a group includes high and low portions, each transponder includes means for lowering the voltage appearing across said pair of electrical conductors to encode the information on the low portion of one pulse, characterized in that although a non-selected transponder has its output shorted, the controller is nevertheless capable of recovering the encoded information provided by the replying transponder.

5. A communication system as claimed in claim 1, in which each pulse in a group includes high and low portions, each transponder includes means for lowering the voltage appearing across said pair of electrical conductors to encode the information on the low portion of one pulse, characterized in that although a non-selected transponder is replying simultaneously with a selected transponder, the controller has the capability of determining whether both answer signals, from the non-selected and selected transponders, are within an acceptable range.

6. A communication system as claimed in claim 1, in which a transducer is coupled to the replying transponder, and the replying transponder includes means for encoding said information as a function of the transducer response, so that the decoded answer signal provides transducer response information at the controller.

7. A communication system as claimed in claim 6, in which the controller continuously supervises all the transducers in the system by monitoring the transducer response information from all transponders.

8. A communication system as claimed in claim 6, in which the controller includes means for storing a first answer signal denoting the transducer response information from the replying transponder, a subsequent answer signal provides later transducer response information, and a summation stage is connected to compare the subsequent answer signal against the first answer signal, to provide a transducer compensation signal for use in the system.

9. A communication system as claimed in claim 8, and further comprising a comparator, coupled to the summation stage, for providing an output signal when the amplitude of the transducer compensation signal exceeds a preset level.

10. A communication system as claimed in claim 1, and further comprising means in the replying transponder for encoding calibration response information on said one pulse, so that the decoded answer signal provides calibration response information at the controller.

11. A communication system as claimed in claim 10, in which the controller continually supervises all the transponders in the system by monitoring the calibration response information from all transponders.

12. A communication system as claimed in claim 10, and further comprising means in the controller for storing the original calibration response information, and summation means for utilizing a subsequent answer signal in comparison with the stored calibration response information to provide a transponder compensation signal for use in the system.

13. A communication system as claimed in claim 12, and further comprising a comparator, coupled to the summation stage, for providing an output signal when the amplitude of the transponder compensation signal exceeds a preset level.

14. A communication system as claimed in claim 10, in which the replying transponder includes an indicator, and means in the controller for recognizing when a returned calibration response signal is within preset limits and, upon such recognition, for actuating said indicator to verify that the calibration response signal from said one transponder is within said preset limits.

15. A communication system as claimed in claim 14, wherein said one transponder includes an adjustable component connected to effect a variaton in said calibration response signal, thus allowing modification of the calibration response signal at the transponder until the signal is within the preset limits, as signalled by actuation of indicator at said one transponder.

16. A communication system as claimed in claim 1, in which a transducer is coupled to the replying transponder, an answer signal provides transducer response information to the controller, and the controller compares the answer signal against at least one limit set for said transducer, thus deriving the transducer sensitivity as represented by the difference between the limit set for the particular transducer and the transducer response information provided by the answer signal.

17. A communication system as claimed in claim 16, in which the sensitivity of all transducers is continually monitored, so that the alarm and trouble conditions for each transducer are determined at the controller.

18. A communication system as claimed in claim 16, in which said controller comprises means for adjusting said one limit to provide adjustable sensitivity of the transducer, even though the transducer may be coupled to said conductors at a location remote from said controller.

19. A communication system as claimed in claim 16, in which said controller provides multiple limits for the transducer.

20. A communication system as claimed in claim 16, in which the sensitivity is controlled constantly and automatically at the controller.

21. A communication system as claimed in claim 20, in which a memory is provided in the controller to store a program for controlling the sensitivity.

22. A communication system as claimed in claim 16, in which means is provided for the selective change of the sensitivity of any transducer.

23. A communication system as claimed in claim 22, in which a keyboard is utilized in the selective sensitivity change.

24. A communication system as claimed in claim 1, in which the controller obtains compensation data by originally polling the transponders at a controlled time when the supervised premises are in a desired state, such as a low-occupancy, quiescent condition, subsequently polling the transponders when the supervised premises are in a similar state, and using a comparison of data from the latest poll and at least one earlier poll to compensate the system for long-term component changes.

25. A communication system as claimed in claim 1, in which the controller supplies electrical power for the transponders and transducers over the same conductor pair on which the information is passed.

26. A bidirectional, interactive communication system, comprising a controller connected to transmit a series of signal groups sequentially over a pair of electrical conductors, wherein each signal group includes the same number of pulses, each pulse includes a high portion and a low portion, and a plurality of transponders coupled to said conductors, each of said transponders having means for replying to the controller by selectively modifying a low portion of at least one pulse transmitted by the controller and thus encoding information on said one pulse, which reply is terminated by the controller with an overriding, simultaneous transmission,

wherein the controller includes means for sampling the low portion of the pulse modified by the replying transponder at regular intervals to decode the information encoded on said modified pulse, and for providing an answer signal denoting said information.

27. A communication system as claimed in claim 26, in which the controller includes a first switch operable to establish the high portion of a pulse, and a first transponder includes a second switch operable to effect the selective modification of a pulse low portion, wherein the overriding, simultaneous transmission is effected by operation of said first switch which terminates the transponder reply irrespective of the position of said second switch.

28. A communication system as claimed in claim 27, in which the sampling of the modified pulses is conducted at a reference frequency over a sampling period, and means is provided for increasing the sampling rate to a second frequency higher than the reference frequency at the beginning, and in a central portion, of the sampling period, to enhance the accuracy of the answer signal without necessitating sampling at the higher frequency during the entire sampling period.

29. A communication system as claimed in claim 27, in which a transducer is coupled to the replying transponder, and the replying transponder includes means for encoding said information as a function of the transducer response, so that the decoded answer signal provides transducer response information at the controller.

30. A communication system as claimed in claim 28, in which the controller includes means for storing a first answer signal denoting the transducer response information from the replying transponder, a subsequent answer signal provides later transducer response information, and a summation stage is connected to compare the subsequent answer signal against the first answer signal, to provide a transducer compensation signal for use in the system.

31. A communication system as claimed in claim 27, and further comprising means in the replying transponder for encoding calibration response information on said one pulse, so that the decoded answer signal provides calibration response information at the controller.

32. A communication system as claimed in claim 31, and further comprising means in the controller for storing the original calibration response information, and summation means for utilizing a subsequent answer signal in comparison with the stored calibration response information to provide a transponder compensation signal for use in the system.

33. A communication system as claimed in claim 31, in which the replying transponder includes a visible indicator, and means in the controller for recognizing when a returned calibration response signal is within preset limits and, upon such recognition, for actuating said indicator to verify that the calibration response signal from said one transponder is within said preset limits.

34. A communication system as claimed in claim 27, in which a transducer is coupled to the replying transponder, an answer signal provides transducer response information to the controller, and the controller compares the answer signal against at least one limit set for said transducer, thus deriving the transducer sensitivity as represented by the difference between the limit set for the particular transducer and the transducer response information provided by the answer signal.

35. A communication system as claimed in claim 34, in which said controller comprises means for adjusting said one limit to provide adjustable sensitivity of the transducer, even though the transducer may be coupled to said conductors at a location remote from said controller.

36. A communication system as claimed in claim 32, in which said controller provides multiple limits for the transducer.

37. A communication system as claimed in claim 34, in which a memory is provided in the controller to store a program for controlling the transducer sensitivity constantly and automatically.

38. A communication system as claimed in claim 34, in which a keyboard is provided and coupled to the controller for the selective change of the sensitivity of any transducer.

39. A communication system as claimed in claim 27, in which the controller obtains compensation data by originally polling the transponders at a controller time when the supervised premises are in a desired state, such as a low-occupancy, quiescent condition, subsequently polling the transponders when the supervised premises are in a similar state, and using a comparison of data from the latest poll and at least one earlier poll to compensate the system for long-term component changes.

40. A communication system as claimed in claim 27, in which the controller supplies electrical power for the transponders and transducers over the same conductor pair on which the data is passed.

41. A communication system as claimed in claim 27, in which said transducer is a detector for particles of combustion, and the transducer response information is an analog signal denoting the concentration of such particles at the detector.

42. A communication system as claimed in claim 27, in which said transducer is a two-position switch, and in which said transponder includes a switch logic circuit, operable to provide said transducer response information indicating the status of said switch.