Add/shed load control according to multiple add/shed sequences
-
0Associated
Cases -
0Associated
Defendants -
0Accused
Products -
113Forward
Citations -
0
Petitions -
1
Assignment
First Claim
1. An add/shed system for adding/shedding loads to maintain a building'"'"'s power consumption below a predetermined level, each load being assigned to at least one of multiple types of add/shed routines, each routine controlling the adding/shedding of said loads in a different sequence, said system comprising:
- a plurality of loads; and
,processor means connected to said plurality of loads and adapted to be connected to a power meter for determining which of said plurality of loads should be added/shed to maintain power consumption below said predetermined level and for determining which type of the multiple types of add/shed routine is assigned to each load, said processor means for adding/shedding each load according to its assigned routine.
1 Assignment
0 Petitions

Accused Products

Abstract
An add/shed system for adding/shedding loads to maintain a building'"'"'s power consumption below a predetermined level, each load being assigned to one of the multiple types of add/shed routines, each routine controlling the adding/shedding of the loads in a different sequence.
119 Citations
Apparatus for managing an energy consuming load by compiling load state data from other loads | ||
Patent #
US 7,894,946 B2
Filed 07/27/2009
|
Current Assignee
Encycle Corp.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Regen Energy Inc.
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING AN ENERGY CONSUMING LOAD | ||
Patent #
US 20110172846A1
Filed 03/14/2011
|
Current Assignee
Encycle Corp.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Encycle Corp.
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING AN ENERGY CONSUMING LOAD | ||
Patent #
US 20110172845A1
Filed 01/24/2011
|
Current Assignee
Encycle Corp.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Encycle Corp.
|
System, method, and architecture for dynamic server power management and dynamic workload management for multi-server environment | ||
Patent #
US 7,721,125 B2
Filed 02/07/2006
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
Control system for multiple heating, ventilation and air conditioning units | ||
Patent #
US 7,809,472 B1
Filed 07/05/2005
|
Current Assignee
Custom Manufacturing Engineering Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Custom Manufacturing Engineering Inc.
|
ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR AUXILIARY POWER SOURCE | ||
Patent #
US 20100019574A1
Filed 05/04/2009
|
Current Assignee
FJI HOLDING LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
FJI HOLDING LLC
|
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR POWER LOAD MANAGEMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20100026096A1
Filed 09/05/2008
|
Current Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
Sponsoring Entity
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
Grid responsive control device | ||
Patent #
US 20100072817A1
Filed 06/01/2006
|
Current Assignee
RESPONSIVELOAD LIMITED
|
Sponsoring Entity
RESPONSIVELOAD LIMITED
|
WIRELESS CONTROLLER WITH GATEWAY | ||
Patent #
US 20100168924A1
Filed 02/04/2010
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ademco Inc.
|
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR POWER LOAD MANAGEMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20100211232A1
Filed 04/28/2010
|
Current Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
Sponsoring Entity
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
Apparatus, architecture, and method for integrated modular server system providing dynamically power-managed and work-load managed network devices | ||
Patent #
US 7,822,967 B2
Filed 10/24/2006
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
Power on demand and workload management system and method | ||
Patent #
US 7,484,111 B2
Filed 02/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
System and method for activity or event based dynamic energy conserving server reconfiguration | ||
Patent #
US 7,512,822 B2
Filed 02/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
Apparatus and method for modular dynamically power managed power supply and cooling system for computer systems, server applications, and other electronic devices | ||
Patent #
US 7,533,283 B2
Filed 02/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
System and method for activity or event base dynamic energy conserving server reconfiguration | ||
Patent #
US 7,552,350 B2
Filed 04/24/2007
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
HVAC CONTROLLER HAVING A PARAMETER ADJUSTMENT ELEMENT WITH A QUALITATIVE INDICATOR | ||
Patent #
US 20090143916A1
Filed 11/25/2008
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ademco Inc.
|
System, method, architecture, and computer program product for dynamic power management in a computer system | ||
Patent #
US 7,558,976 B2
Filed 02/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
System, method, and architecture for dynamic server power management and dynamic workload management for multi-server environment | ||
Patent #
US 7,562,239 B2
Filed 02/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
Method and apparatus for implementing enablement state decision for energy consuming load based on demand and duty cycle of load | ||
Patent #
US 7,580,775 B2
Filed 07/11/2006
|
Current Assignee
Encycle Corp.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Regen Energy Inc.
|
System, method, and architecture for dynamic server power management and dynamic workload management for multiserver environment | ||
Patent #
RE40866E1
Filed 02/22/2007
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
SYSTEM, ARCHITECTURE, AND METHOD FOR LOGICAL SERVER AND OTHER NETWORK DEVICES IN A DYNAMICALLY CONFIGURABLE MULTI-SERVER NETWORK ENVIRONMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20090235104A1
Filed 05/27/2009
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING AN ENERGY CONSUMING LOAD | ||
Patent #
US 20090287359A1
Filed 07/27/2009
|
Current Assignee
Encycle Corp.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Encycle Corp.
|
WIRELESS CONTROLLER WITH GATEWAY | ||
Patent #
US 20080011864A1
Filed 07/12/2007
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ademco Inc.
|
Method and apparatus for managing an energy consuming load | ||
Patent #
US 20080015742A1
Filed 07/11/2006
|
Current Assignee
Encycle Corp.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Encycle Corp.
|
Profile based method for deriving a temperature setpoint using a ‘delta’ based on cross-indexing a received price-point level signal | ||
Patent #
US 7,346,467 B2
Filed 08/10/2005
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell International Inc.
|
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING ADDRESSABLE LIGHTING UNITS | ||
Patent #
US 20080183337A1
Filed 01/31/2008
|
Current Assignee
Cooper Technologies Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Method and system for improving the efficiency and reliability of a power grid | ||
Patent #
US 7,460,931 B2
Filed 10/07/2005
|
Current Assignee
Jay Jacobson
|
Sponsoring Entity
Jay Jacobson
|
Energy management system for controlling energy supplied to a set of customer buildings | ||
Patent #
US 7,206,670 B2
Filed 10/01/2004
|
Current Assignee
Battelle Memorial Institute
|
Sponsoring Entity
Battelle Memorial Institute
|
Apparatus, architecture, and method for integrated modular server system providing dynamically power-managed and work-load managed network devices | ||
Patent #
US 20070101173A1
Filed 10/24/2006
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
Method and system for improving the efficiency and reliability of a power grid | ||
Patent #
US 20070135972A1
Filed 10/07/2005
|
Current Assignee
Jay Jacobson
|
Sponsoring Entity
Jay Jacobson
|
Multi-server and multi-CPU power management system and method | ||
Patent #
US 7,228,441 B2
Filed 05/18/2001
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
System and method for activity or event based dynamic energy conserving server reconfiguration | ||
Patent #
US 7,237,129 B2
Filed 05/18/2001
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
Dynamic power and workload management for multi-server system | ||
Patent #
US 7,272,735 B2
Filed 02/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
System and method for activity or event based dynamic energy conserving server reconfiguration | ||
Patent #
US 20070245165A1
Filed 04/24/2007
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
Method and apparatus for monitoring the consumption of utilities in business premises | ||
Patent #
US 5,404,136 A
Filed 02/19/1991
|
Current Assignee
Derek R. Marsden
|
Sponsoring Entity
Derek R. Marsden
|
Simplified demand limit control | ||
Patent #
US 4,694,192 A
Filed 11/23/1984
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell Incorporated
|
Apparatus and method for monitoring an energy management system | ||
Patent #
US 4,855,922 A
Filed 03/20/1987
|
Current Assignee
Comverge Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Scientific-Atlanta Incorporated
|
Load control for partially increasing/decreasing power usage | ||
Patent #
US 5,543,667 A
Filed 11/21/1994
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell Incorporated
|
Profile based method for deriving a temperature setpoint using a 'delta' based on cross-indexing a received price-point level signal | ||
Patent #
US 20060036350A1
Filed 08/10/2005
|
Current Assignee
Bohrer Philip J., Robert J. Schnell, Michael B. Atlass, Gregory J. Merten
|
Sponsoring Entity
Bohrer Philip J., Robert J. Schnell, Michael B. Atlass, Gregory J. Merten
|
Dynamic power and workload management for multi-server system | ||
Patent #
US 7,032,119 B2
Filed 05/18/2001
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
Method and system for thermal management | ||
Patent #
US 20060106503A1
Filed 11/10/2005
|
Current Assignee
Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Astronics Advanced Electronic Systems Corporation
|
Dielectric relaxation memory | ||
Patent #
US 20060163633A1
Filed 03/27/2006
|
Current Assignee
Cem Basceri, Gurtej Sandhu
|
Sponsoring Entity
Cem Basceri, Gurtej Sandhu
|
Apparatus and method for modular dynamically power managed power supply and cooling system for computer systems, server applications, and other electronic devices | ||
Patent #
US 20060248325A1
Filed 02/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
System, method, architecture, and computer program product for dynamic power management in a computer system | ||
Patent #
US 20060259797A1
Filed 02/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
System, method, and architecture for dynamic server power management and dynamic workload management for multi-server environment | ||
Patent #
US 20060265608A1
Filed 02/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
System, method, and architecture for dynamic server power management and dynamic workload management for multi-server environment | ||
Patent #
US 20060259796A1
Filed 02/07/2006
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
Dynamic power and workload management for multi-server system | ||
Patent #
US 20060248361A1
Filed 02/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
Apparatus, architecture, and method for integrated modular server system providing dynamically power-managed and work-load managed network devices | ||
Patent #
US 7,134,011 B2
Filed 05/18/2001
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
System and method for activity or event based dynamic energy conserving server reconfiguration | ||
Patent #
US 20060253717A1
Filed 02/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
Multi-server and multi-CPU power management system and method | ||
Patent #
US 20060248360A1
Filed 02/28/2006
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
System and method for supply distribution | ||
Patent #
US 7,151,327 B2
Filed 06/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Bruce Merdjan
|
Sponsoring Entity
Bruce Merdjan
|
System, method, and architecture for dynamic server power management and dynamic workload management for multi-server environment | ||
Patent #
US 6,859,882 B2
Filed 05/18/2001
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Amphus Inc.
|
Energy management system | ||
Patent #
US 20050102068A1
Filed 10/01/2004
|
Current Assignee
Battelle Memorial Institute
|
Sponsoring Entity
Battelle Memorial Institute
|
System and method for supply distribution | ||
Patent #
US 20050116543A1
Filed 06/20/2003
|
Current Assignee
Bruce Merdjan
|
Sponsoring Entity
Bruce Merdjan
|
In-home dispersed power source system | ||
Patent #
US 20050116542A1
Filed 02/26/2004
|
Current Assignee
Hitachi Ltd.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Hitachi Ltd.
|
Multi-server and multi-CPU power management system and method | ||
Patent #
US 20050177755A1
Filed 05/18/2001
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
Profile based method for deriving a temperature setpoint using a ‘delta’ based on cross-indexing a received price-point level signal | ||
Patent #
US 6,975,958 B2
Filed 04/30/2003
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Profile based method for deriving a temperature setpoint using a ‘delta’ based on cross-indexing a received price-point level signal | ||
Patent #
US 6,574,581 B1
Filed 10/25/1994
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell Incorporated
|
System, method, and architecture for dynamic server power management and dynamic workload management for multi-server environment | ||
Patent #
US 20030196126A1
Filed 04/11/2002
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Profile based method for deriving a temperature setpoint using a 'delta' based on cross-indexing a received price-point level signal | ||
Patent #
US 20030187549A1
Filed 04/30/2003
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
System and method for activity or event based dynamic energy conserving server reconfiguration | ||
Patent #
US 20030200473A1
Filed 05/18/2001
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
System, method, and architecture for dynamic server power management and dynamic workload management for multi-server environment | ||
Patent #
US 20030188208A1
Filed 05/18/2001
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
System, method, architecture, and computer program product for dynamic power management in a computer system | ||
Patent #
US 20020004915A1
Filed 05/18/2001
|
Current Assignee
Amphus Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Amphus Inc.
|
Apparatus and method for modular dynamically power managed power supply and cooling system for computer systems, server applications, and other electronic devices | ||
Patent #
US 20020007464A1
Filed 05/18/2001
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
Apparatus, architecture, and method for integrated modular server system providing dynamically power-managed and work-load managed network devices | ||
Patent #
US 20020004913A1
Filed 05/18/2001
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
Adaptive shed strategy for constraint enforcement in a multivariate control system | ||
Patent #
US 6,349,236 B1
Filed 10/06/1998
|
Current Assignee
Schneider Electric Systems USA Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Invensys Systems Incorporated
|
Dynamic power and workload management for multi-server system | ||
Patent #
US 20020062454A1
Filed 05/18/2001
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
System and method of computer operating mode control for power consumption reduction | ||
Patent #
US 6,079,025 A
Filed 07/23/1998
|
Current Assignee
St Clair Intellectual Property Consultants Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
St Clair Intellectual Property Consultants Incorporated
|
Computer activity monitor providing idle thread and other event sensitive clock and power control | ||
Patent #
US 5,892,959 A
Filed 12/17/1996
|
Current Assignee
St Clair Intellectual Property Consultants Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Comerica Bank Trust
|
Apparatus for reducing computer system power consumption | ||
Patent #
RE36189E
Filed 12/18/1992
|
Current Assignee
Hewlett-Packard Development Company L.P.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Compaq Computer Corporation
|
Energy saving motor control device | ||
Patent #
US 5,925,998 A
Filed 07/21/1997
|
Current Assignee
Eric O. Olson
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Computer software for optimizing energy efficiency of a lighting system for a target energy consumption level | ||
Patent #
US 5,812,422 A
Filed 09/07/1995
|
Current Assignee
US Philips Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
US Philips Corporation
|
Maximum demand power control apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 5,834,855 A
Filed 12/27/1995
|
Current Assignee
MARK TECH CO. LTD.
|
Sponsoring Entity
MARK TECH CO. LTD.
|
Responding to pricing signals from a power supplier using mixed add/shed and profile setback delta schemes | ||
Patent #
US 5,598,349 A
Filed 10/25/1994
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell Incorporated
|
Real time and/shed load based on received tier pricing and direct load control with processors for each load | ||
Patent #
US 5,644,173 A
Filed 10/25/1994
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell Incorporated
|
Peak demand limiter and sequencer | ||
Patent #
US 5,581,132 A
Filed 08/04/1995
|
Current Assignee
Jon D. Chadwick
|
Sponsoring Entity
Jon D. Chadwick
|
Method and apparatus for adaptive demand limiting electric consumption through load shedding | ||
Patent #
US 5,414,640 A
Filed 02/23/1994
|
Current Assignee
Johnson Controls Technology Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
Johnson Service Company
|
Method of managing electric power on the basis of tariff schedules, in a network within a dwelling or the like | ||
Patent #
US 5,430,430 A
Filed 04/08/1993
|
Current Assignee
INGENITY
|
Sponsoring Entity
EURO CP S.A.R.L.
|
Method and a system for globally managing electric power in a network within a dwelling or the like | ||
Patent #
US 5,436,510 A
Filed 04/08/1993
|
Current Assignee
INGENITY
|
Sponsoring Entity
EURO CP S.A.R.L.
|
Add/shed load control using anticipatory processes | ||
Patent #
US 4,916,328 A
Filed 12/08/1988
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell Incorporated
|
Apparatus for reducing computer system power consumption | ||
Patent #
US 4,980,836 A
Filed 10/14/1988
|
Current Assignee
Hewlett-Packard Development Company L.P.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Compaq Computer Corporation
|
Method of optimizing control of plural switched electric loads to reduce switching transients | ||
Patent #
US 4,829,159 A
Filed 11/05/1986
|
Current Assignee
US Philips Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
US Philips Corporation
|
Power adapter for electrical installations and especially domestic installations with so-called carrier current control | ||
Patent #
US 4,888,495 A
Filed 06/22/1987
|
Current Assignee
Manufacture DAppareillage Electrique de Cahors, Electricit De France
|
Sponsoring Entity
Manufacture DAppareillage Electrique de Cahors, Electricit De France
|
Power adapter for electrical installations and especially domestic installations | ||
Patent #
US 4,771,185 A
Filed 06/24/1986
|
Current Assignee
Manufacture DAppareillage Electrique de Cahors, Electricit De France, Paul Feron
|
Sponsoring Entity
Manufacture DAppareillage Electrique de Cahors, Electricit De France, Paul Feron
|
Local power switching control subsystem | ||
Patent #
US 4,663,539 A
Filed 11/29/1984
|
Current Assignee
Unisys Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Burroughs Incorporated
|
System, architecture, and method for logical server and other network devices in a dynamically configurable multi-server network environment | ||
Patent #
US 8,074,092 B2
Filed 05/27/2009
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
Method and system for power load management | ||
Patent #
US 8,232,675 B2
Filed 04/28/2010
|
Current Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
Sponsoring Entity
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
Method and system for power load management | ||
Patent #
US 8,232,684 B2
Filed 09/05/2008
|
Current Assignee
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
Sponsoring Entity
Industrial Technology Research Institute
|
Method and apparatus for managing an energy consuming load | ||
Patent #
US 8,527,108 B2
Filed 03/14/2011
|
Current Assignee
Encycle Corp.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Regen Energy Inc.
|
Method and apparatus for managing an energy consuming load | ||
Patent #
US 8,527,109 B2
Filed 01/24/2011
|
Current Assignee
Encycle Corp.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Regen Energy Inc.
|
Controller interface with multiple day programming | ||
Patent #
US 8,620,460 B2
Filed 07/12/2012
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Apparatus and method for modular dynamically power managed power supply and cooling system for computer systems, server applications, and other electronic devices | ||
Patent #
US 8,700,923 B2
Filed 02/03/2009
|
Current Assignee
Huron IP LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Huron IP LLC
|
HVAC controller having a parameter adjustment element with a qualitative indicator | ||
Patent #
US 8,731,723 B2
Filed 11/25/2008
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Wireless controller with gateway | ||
Patent #
US 8,870,086 B2
Filed 07/12/2007
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Interview programming for an HVAC controller | ||
Patent #
US 8,903,552 B2
Filed 03/06/2012
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Apparatus for managing an energy consuming load | ||
Patent #
US 8,918,223 B2
Filed 05/14/2013
|
Current Assignee
Encycle Corp.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Regen Energy Inc.
|
POWER MANAGEMENT DEVICE AND POWER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20150005978A1
Filed 09/19/2014
|
Current Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co Ltd.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co Ltd.
|
Wireless controller with gateway | ||
Patent #
US 9,033,255 B2
Filed 02/04/2010
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Method and apparatus for managing an energy consuming load | ||
Patent #
US 9,110,647 B2
Filed 05/14/2013
|
Current Assignee
Encycle Corp.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Encycle Corp.
|
Configurable thermostat for controlling HVAC system | ||
Patent #
US 9,471,069 B2
Filed 03/27/2015
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Methods and systems for controlling addressable lighting units | ||
Patent #
US 9,538,625 B2
Filed 03/03/2014
|
Current Assignee
Eaton Intelligent Power Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Cooper Technologies Company
|
Method and apparatus for managing an energy consuming load | ||
Patent #
US 9,703,339 B2
Filed 08/01/2013
|
Current Assignee
Encycle Corp.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Encycle Corp.
|
Interview programming for an HVAC controller | ||
Patent #
US 9,733,653 B2
Filed 12/01/2014
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Wireless controller with gateway | ||
Patent #
US 9,797,615 B2
Filed 10/22/2014
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell International Inc.
|
Wireless controller with gateway | ||
Patent #
US 9,909,775 B2
Filed 03/27/2015
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ademco Inc.
|
Power management device and power management system | ||
Patent #
US 9,927,824 B2
Filed 09/19/2014
|
Current Assignee
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co Ltd.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co Ltd.
|
HVAC controller having a parameter adjustment element with a qualitative indicator | ||
Patent #
US 9,964,321 B2
Filed 04/17/2014
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ademco Inc.
|
HVAC controller with multi-region display and guided setup | ||
Patent #
US 10,082,312 B2
Filed 04/30/2014
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ademco Inc.
|
Method and apparatus for managing an energy consuming load | ||
Patent #
US 10,139,877 B2
Filed 07/23/2015
|
Current Assignee
Encycle Corp.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Encycle Corp.
|
Wireless controller with gateway | ||
Patent #
US 10,222,084 B2
Filed 02/02/2018
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ademco Inc.
|
Triage of initial schedule setup for an HVAC controller | ||
Patent #
US 10,302,322 B2
Filed 07/22/2016
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ademco Inc.
|
Simplified schedule programming of an HVAC controller | ||
Patent #
US 10,317,100 B2
Filed 07/22/2016
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ademco Inc.
|
Building automation system setup using a remote control device | ||
Patent #
US 10,436,977 B2
Filed 12/09/2014
|
Current Assignee
Ademco Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Ademco Inc.
|
Adaptive load shedding | ||
Patent #
US 4,337,401 A
Filed 01/23/1981
|
Current Assignee
Honeywell Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Honeywell Incorporated
|
Programmable electronic real-time load controller providing for adaptation of load control in response to varying environmental conditions | ||
Patent #
US 4,354,241 A
Filed 12/27/1979
|
Current Assignee
Butler Manufacturing Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
Butler Manufacturing Company
|
Electrical load restoration method | ||
Patent #
US 4,211,933 A
Filed 05/26/1978
|
Current Assignee
Cyborex Laboratories Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Cyborex Laboratories Inc.
|
System for monitoring and controlling electric power consumption | ||
Patent #
US 4,216,384 A
Filed 12/09/1977
|
Current Assignee
Directed Energy Systems Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Directed Energy Systems Inc.
|
Load control processor | ||
Patent #
US 4,167,786 A
Filed 01/24/1978
|
Current Assignee
General Electric Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
General Electric Company
|
Demand/schedule controller | ||
Patent #
US 4,125,782 A
Filed 02/15/1977
|
Current Assignee
Allen-Bradley Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
Allen-Bradley Company
|
17 Claims
- 1. An add/shed system for adding/shedding loads to maintain a building'"'"'s power consumption below a predetermined level, each load being assigned to at least one of multiple types of add/shed routines, each routine controlling the adding/shedding of said loads in a different sequence, said system comprising:
a plurality of loads; and
,processor means connected to said plurality of loads and adapted to be connected to a power meter for determining which of said plurality of loads should be added/shed to maintain power consumption below said predetermined level and for determining which type of the multiple types of add/shed routine is assigned to each load, said processor means for adding/shedding each load according to its assigned routine. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
- 7. An add/shed system for adding/shedding loads to maintain a building'"'"'s power consumption below a predetermined level, each load being assigned to one of a plurality of shed orders depending upon a preassigned add/shed priority, each shed order being assigned to one of multiple types of add/shed routines, each different type of routine controlling the sequence of adding/shedding of the loads assigned to its associated order, any of the multiple of types of add/shed routines capable of being assigned to more than one shed order, said system comprising:
a plurality of loads; and
,processor means connected to said plurality of loads and adapted to be connected to a power meter for determining which of said plurality of loads should be added/shed to maintain power consumption below said predetermined level and for determining which shed order and which multiple type of add/shed routine are assigned to each load, said processor means for adding/shedding each load first according to its shed order and then according to the routine assigned to the shed order. - View Dependent Claims (8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17)
1 Specification
The present invention relates to a system for maintaining power consumption below a predetermined level and, more particularly, to an add/shed control for maintaining power consumption below a predetermined level where the loads can be added and/or shed in different sequences depending upon the prioritization level given to each load and upon the add/shed sequence assigned to each prioritization level.
Power utilities charge their customers according to a policy which is designed both to encourage energy conservation and to assess the cost for the extra power generating equipment which they must acquire and maintain to meet peak demands against those creating the peak demand. Accordingly, these power utilities will typically charge their customers at a first rate for power consumed below a first predetermined level, at a second rate for power consumed between the first predetermined level and a second predetermined level. If power consumption should exceed the second predetermined level, the utilities will charge what is in effect a penalty because they have had to acquire and maintain extra power generating equipment to meet these periods of unusually high demand. If all of the utilities customers could be encouraged to eliminate excessive usage of power, the power utilities would then not be required to provide the extra equipment to generate the extra power during these peak demand periods and would be able presumably to pass along these savings to its customers through lower charges. In order to encourage economies in power consumption by their customers, the public utilities, therefore, charge a "penalty" on those customers who create peak demands.
In order to avoid these peak demand charges imposed upon them by their power utilities, power consumers have employed automatic control systems which monitor power consumption within their facilities and will control the energization state of the power consuming loads within their facilities to maintain power consumption below some predetermined value in order to reduce the extra charges which would be imposed upon them during peak demand periods or intervals. These systems have typically taken the form of add/shed control systems which are designed to shed loads as power consumption approaches a predetermined level which is established by the customer. Alternatively, as power consumption begins to fall away from this predetermined level, previously shed loads can be added back on line so that they may be utilized by the customer.
Several different types of add/shed control systems have been proposed in the past. For example, the most common type of add/shed control system establishes a prioritized load order wherein the load having lowest priority will be shed first and the load having highest priority will be shed last. In such a system, if loads can be added back on line, the load having the highest priority will be added first and the load having the lowest priority will be added last.
Another add/shed system which is known adds/sheds loads on the basis of comfort fairness. That is, the loads associated with zones having conditions closest to setpoint will have the lowest priority and loads associated with zones having conditions the farthest away from setpoint will have the highest priority. In this system, the loads having lowest priority will be shed first and the loads having highest priority will be shed last on the basis that it is more fair to shed the loads associated with the zones being closes to the comfort range first.
These systems, however, are inflexible because rarely can all the loads within a building be made to fit within one of these types of add/shed routines. For example, it is more desirable to shed the air handling fan systems within the building according to a comfort fairness routine than according to a sequential routine because a sequential routine is a fixed routine and will not necessarily result in fair control of the air handling fan systems. On the other hand, the outdoor lights certainly would not be shed on the basis of comfort fairness and it may also be determined that the outdoor lights are all of equal priority so that they could not be prioritized according to a sequential routine. Thus, the outdoor lights may be shed rotationally so that the first shed will also be the first added.
Accordingly, the present invention provides an add/shed system for adding/shedding loads to maintain a building'"'"'s power consumption below a predetermined level, each load being assigned to one of multiple types of add/shed routines, each routine controlling the adding/shedding of the loads in a different sequence.
These and other features and advantages will become more apparent from a detailed consideration of the invention when taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
FIG. 1 shows a functional block diagram of the system according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart for controlling the adding/shedding of the loads; and,
FIG. 3 is a flow chart showing the determination of which add/shed routines apply to which loads.
As shown in FIG. 1, an add/shed processor 11 is connected by a communication channel 12 to a plurality of remote panels 13-1 through 13-N. Each remote panel can control, for example, four loads A-D. In such a system, if the add/shed processor 11 wished to turn off load D associated with remote panel 13-N, the processor would construct a message addressing remote panel 13-N and instructing that panel to turn off load D through on/off control portion 26. The add/shed processor and remote panels 13-1 through 13-N can be provided in any of the Delta systems manufactured and sold by Honeywell Inc.
According to the present invention, add/shed processor 11 is provided with memory 14 which is arranged to control the loads associated with the remote panels according to one of a plurality of add/shed routines. These add/shed routines may be a comfort fairness routine 15, a sequential routine 16, a rotational routine 17 and a manual routine 18.
For added flexibility, section 19 of memory 14 is provided with a plurality of shed orders. Each routine 15-18 is assigned to at least one or perhaps more of the shed orders provided in 19. Each load controlled by the remote panels 13-1 through 13-N is then assigned to one of the shed orders. For example,
______________________________________Shed Order 1 RotationalShed Order 2 SequentialShed Order 3 Comfort FairnessShed Order 4 RotationalShed Order 5 SequentialShed Order 6 Comfort FairnessShed Order 7 RotationalShed Order 8 SequentialShed Order 9 Comfort FairnessShed Order 10 RotationalShed Order 11 SequentialShed Order 12 Comfort FairnessShed Order 13 RotationalShed Order 14 SequentialShed Order 15 Comfort FairnessShed Order 16 RotationalShed Order 17 SequentialShed Order 18 Comfort FairnessShed Order 19 RotationalShed Order 20 SequentialShed Order 21 Comfort FairnessShed Order 22 Manual______________________________________
In assigning loads to these shed orders, not all shed orders have to be assigned loads. As an example, if it is decided that the loads having the lowest priority should be shed sequentially, these loads are then assigned to shed order 2 rather than to shed order 1. Shed order 1 will have no loads assigned to it. Shed order 1 is the first level to be shed and so on with shed order 21 being the last order to be shed. Shed order 22 will be discussed hereinafter. If no loads are assigned to shed order 1, the system will simply skip to shed order 2 for shedding any loads which have to be shed.
The rotational routine is similar to a first shed, first added routine. That is, when any load can be added back on line, the load which was first shed will be the load first added. This routine can also be used to even out the shedding and adding of loads. For example, if there are three loads assigned to shed order 1, but only the first two loads are shed and then added back on line, the next time loads have to be shed, the system will begin with load 3.
The sequential routine operates on the principle that all loads in a shed order to which is assigned a sequential routine are prioritized within the shed order. Thus, the load which is first shed is the load having the lowest priority with the level. On the other hand, the load which is first added is the load last shed, that is, of the loads which were previously shed, the first load that will be added will be the load having the highest priority.
The comfort fairness routine is a floating type of sequential routine in nature. That is, the loads within the shed order are prioritized but they are prioritized on the basis of comfort fairness rather than a predetermined sequence. Comfort fairness prioritization dictates that the loads associated with the zone being closest to setpoint will have the lowest priority and loads associated with zones being farthest away from setpoint will have the highest priority. Thus, it is more desirable to shed loads associated with zones which are most near comfortable conditions than loads associated with zones being the farthest away from comfortable conditions.
Finally, the manual shed routine at shed order 22 requires that the human operator take action to indicate which loads assigned at this shed order level should be shed. Along these lines, therefore, manual shed CRT 21 is provided so that the loads assigned to shed order 22 can be displayed if all of the loads assigned to shed orders 1-21 have been shed and if power consumption is still threatening to exceed the power demand limit established within memory section 22.
As an example of how loads can be shed according to shed orders, it can be assumed that a building has four outdoor light loads, four air handling fan loads, two indoor lighting reduction loads, three lavatory hot water heater loads, two chiller loads and three non-critical process loads (washing machines, etc.).
The user of these loads may then determine that the outdoor lights have the lowest priority and should be shed first. The user may also determine that the four outdoor light loads need not be prioritized with respect to one another and can be, therefore, shed on a rotational basis. Accordingly, the outdoor light loads are assigned to shed order 1. Next, the loads which can be shed after the outdoor light loads according to the user'"'"'s assessments of his loads and their priorities may be the four lavatory hot water heater loads. Again, the user may determine that these loads cannot be prioritized with respect to one another and should be, therefore, shed rotationally. Thus, these loads are assigned to shed order 4. Shed orders 2 and 3 will, therefore, remain unassigned. The indoor lighting reduction loads may be determined to have the next lowest priorities. It may also be determined that one of the indoor lighting reduction loads has a lower priority than the other indoor lighting reduction loads. Therefore, these loads are assigned to shed order 5 and are arranged within this shed order in a priority sequence to be shed sequentially. The non-critical process loads may be next on the priority list but may not have any priority with respect to one another. Therefore, these loads should be assigned to a rotational routine. The next rotational routine in the shed orders as described above is shed order 7. Therefore, these three non-critical process loads will be assigned to shed order 7 and will not be assigned a priority within the shed order. The air handling fan loads are considered to fall next on the priority list. These loads relate to comfort fairness and, therefore, should be assigned to shed order 9. Finally, the user may determine that the chiller loads should not be shed except by conscious human operator decision. Therefore, these loads are assigned to shed order 22 and will be displayed on manual shed CRT 21 should all of the loads assigned to shed orders 1-21 be shed and there is still a danger of exceeding the power demand limit. These loads are not shed automatically and are only shed by manual control.
It should be noted that the user in the above example has skipped shed orders. As will be seen in connection with FIG. 2, any shed orders to which no loads have been assigned will be skipped as the processor determines which loads should be shed and in fact sheds them.
In order to determine which loads should be shed, processor 11 is connected to power meter 23 so that processor 11 can read power consumption and compare power consumption against the power demand limit 22 for initiating the add/shed process. Although any type of power meter can be used, the power meters supplied utilities are adequate for the purposes of processor 11. These meters will typically provide KW pulses which are indicative of power consumption and end of interval sync pulses to indicate the intervals over which power measurements are made. Thus, processor 11 can measure power consumption over the same intervals provided by power meter 23 so that processor 11 can periodically sample power consumption to determine whether the add/shed routines should be entered.
Each time the add/shed interval is entered, such as on power up, the value N, which represents the shed order, is set to 0. The system will then determine, as shown in FIG. 2, whether any loads have to be shed. If no loads have to be shed, the system pauses and then determines whether or not any loads should be added. If no loads should be added, the processor pauses for a predetermined amount of time and then re-enters the decision making cycle.
If loads have to be shed, the processor will determine whether or not all loads at the level N, which was initially set to 0, have been shed. Since there is no shed order 0, the answer must be that all loads at this order have been shed. N is accordingly incremented to 1 and the system will then determine if all loads at this level/order have been shed. If they have not, the processor will shed the load according to the procedure shown in FIG. 3. After the load has been shed, the processor will test whether or not enough load has been shed. If enough load has been shed, the system will then pause before it enters the decision making cycle again.
If enough load has not been shed the processor will then test to determine whether there are any more loads at that level to be shed. If all loads at that level have been shed, the processor will increment to the next level by adding 1 to the old value for N and testing whether the new N value is less than 22. If the N value is less than 22, the system will then determine whether or not there are any loads at that level to be shed. If there are not, it will shed the next load and test whether or not enough load has been shed.
During this procedure, two circumstances will eventually evolve. Either, enough load has been shed at which time the system will pause and then periodically determine whether it has to shed any further loads or whether it can add the shed loads. Or, all loads assigned to the first 21 shed orders have been shed in which case, if more loads still need to be shed, the system will then set N equal to 22 and display the loads, which can be manually shed, on the manual shed CRT 21. The operator then has the option to shed whichever loads he chooses. The system then pauses before it will next determine whether loads should be further shed or added.
At the point where enough load has been shed, the value for N will be at some number depending upon the number of loads which have been shed. For example, if less than all of the sheddable loads have been shed, N could have some value less than 22. If all of the sheddable loads have been shed automatically, the value of N will be 22. If the value of N is less than 22 and power consumption within the building should begin increasing towards the power demand limit, additional loads will be shed and the value for N may increase.
On the other hand, if after a pause, the processor, in testing whether or not loads should be shed or added, determines that loads can be added, the value of N will decrease if enough loads can be added back on line. Thus, the processor will determine whether all loads at the present shed order level N have been added. If not, it will add the next load and determine whether enough load has been added. If enough load has been added, the system will pause before it enters the decision process again. If enough load has not been added, the processor will again determine whether all the loads at that level have been added. If all loads have been added, the value of N is decremented by 1 and the processor will test whether N is equal to 0. If N is equal to 0, then all the loads which can be added back into the system have been added and the system will then pause before the next add/shed test is made. If during the next add/shed test, there is an indication that loads should be shed, the system will then determine whether all the loads at shed order 0 have been shed. Since there are no loads at this level, the value of N is incremented by 1 and the test is then made at shed order level 1.
The "shed next load" routines are shown in FIG. 3. If the next load is to be shed, processor 11 will divide the value of N by 3. If there is a remainder of 1, then the rotational shed routine is utilized. If the remainder is 2, the sequential shed routine is utilized. If there is no remainder, the comfort fairness shed routine is used. According to the process shown in FIG. 3, all shed orders in the series 1, 4, 7 etc. will be assigned to the rotational routine, all shed orders in the series 2, 5, 8 etc. will be assigned to the sequential routine and all shed orders which are a multiple of 3 will be assigned to the comfort fairness routine. The rotational and sequential routines both involve predetermined sequences. The comfort fairness routine involves a variable sequence and may be similar to the routine disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,337,401. Although it is not shown, the "add next load" routine will be similar to that shown in FIG. 3.
It may be desirable to increase energy savings by providing a second demand limit which is lower than the power demand limit so that certain non-essential loads can be shed for the express purpose of lowering energy costs regardless of whether the power consumption approaches the power demand limit. In such a case, a floating demand limit 24 is provided in memory 14. Processor 11 can use the floating demand limit 24 in order to shed the loads assigned to a preselected number of shed orders. For example, as power consumption approaches the floating demand limit 24, the loads assigned to the first 9 shed orders can be shed to maintain power consumption below the floating demand limit. If power consumption continues to increase above this limit, the floating demand limit floats upwards so that no other loads assigned to shed orders 10-22 will be shed. However, when the floating demand limit approaches the power demand limit 22, the remaining loads assigned to shed orders 10-22 are eligible for shed.