Method for controlling output of alarm information

• US 4,543,567 A
• Filed: 04/14/1983
• Issued: 09/24/1985
• Est. Priority Date: 04/14/1983
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha (Toshiba Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Tokyo Shibaura Denki Kabushiki Kaisha (Toshiba Corporation)
• Inventors: Kurihara, Kiyoshi, Shirata, Shigenobu
• Primary Examiner(s): Crosland, Donnie L.
• Application Number:
  US06/485,108
• Time in Patent Office: 894 Days
• Field of Search: 340/519, 340/518, 340/511, 340/506, 340/524, 340/525, 340/52 F, 340/661, 340/870.21, 340/657, 364/550
• US Class Current: 340/519
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 23/00 Alarms responsive to unspecified undesired or abnormal conditions

Abstract

In a method for controlling output of alarm information in a system for monitoring a plant wherein process variables including analog type process variables at respective sensing points in the plant are sampled and each of the sampled analog type process variables is compared with a normal range limit value for determination as to whether it is within a normal range or within an abnormal range, an alarm limit level is determined in accordance with changes that have occurred in the process variable during the latest sampling interval. Output of alarm information is permitted in connection with the process variables that have a priority level whose value is higher than the value of the alarm limit level.

Claims

1. A method for controlling output of alarm information in a system for monitoring a plant wherein process variables including analog type process variables at respective sensing points in the plant are sampled and each of the sampled analog type process variables is compared with a normal range limit value for determination as to whether it is within a normal range or within an abnormal range, said method comprising steps of:

(A) determining, in accordance with changes that have occurred in the process variable during the latest sampling interval, an alarm limit level; and

(B) permitting output of alarm information in connection with the process variables that have a priority level whose value is higher than the value of the alarm limit level.

2. A method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the priority level for each analog type process variable is determined in accordance with an escape degree representing the degree of escape of the sampled value of the process variable from the normal range.

3. A method as set forth in claim 2, wherein the process variables further include ON-OFF type process variables which assume either of two alternative values at any particular instant and the priority level for each of the ON-OFF type process variables for which one of the values is defined as abnormal is determined in advance depending on the importance of the process variable.

4. A method as set forth in claim 2, wherein adjacent zones of an equal width are formed in the abnormal range, and the escape degree is determined according to which zone the sampled value of the process variable occupies.

5. A method as set forth in claim 4, wherein the ratio of the width of the zone to the span between the normal range limit and a critical point at which an immediate breakdown is expected is smaller for more important analog type process variables.

6. A method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the determination of an alarm limit level at said step (A) is made in accordance with the sum of those weighting factors which are assigned to the process variables in which a significant change occurred during the latest sampling interval, a significant change in connection with each analog type process variable being found to have occurred if the value of the process variable was in the abnormal range at the latest sampling while it was in the normal range at the preceding sampling, or if the value of the process variable was in the normal range at the latest sampling while it was in the abnormal range at the preceding sampling, or if the escape degree of the process variable at the latest sampling differs from the escape degree at the preceding sampling.

7. A method as set forth in claim 6, wherein the process variables further include ON-OFF type process variables which assume either of two alternative values at any particular instant and the priority level for each of those ON-OFF process variables on which one of the vallues is defined as abnormal is determined in advance depending on the importance of the process variable, and a significan change in connection with each ON-OFF type process variable is found to have occurred if the value of the ON-OFF type process variable at the latest sampling differs from that at the preceding sampling.

8. A method as set forth in claim 6, wherein when a significant change occurs in one of a pre-designated process variables during the latest sampling interval, a second alarm limit level is set depending on in which pre-designated process variable the significant change occurred, and the greater one of the second alarm limit level and the first mentioned alarm limit level is used as the effective alarm limit level.