Voltage monitoring circuit

• US 4,613,770 A
• Filed: 12/04/1984
• Issued: 09/23/1986
• Est. Priority Date: 09/29/1980
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Consolidated Investments and Development Corporation
• Original Assignee: Consolidated Investments and Development Corporation
• Inventors: Raab, Herman P.
• Primary Examiner(s): Zazworsky, John
• Application Number:
  US06/678,024
• Time in Patent Office: 658 Days
• Field of Search: 307/350, 307/354, 307/358, 307/360, 328/146, 328/147
• US Class Current: 327/74
• CPC Class Codes: G08C 15/12 the signals being represented by pulse characteristics in transmission link

Abstract

A circuit for determining whether a voltage is within a lower voltage range (+12 VDC) or a higher voltage range (+24 VDC) is provided. This circuit includes a resistor-based voltage-scaling circuit, a zener diode reference voltage circuit, and comparators for comparing the scaled voltages across the voltage-scaling circuit and zener diode circuit and for switching in response to the comparison outcome. The comparator output has a first state when the voltage is within acceptable limits in either the 12 VDC or 24 VDC range and a second state when the voltage is outside the acceptable range. Additional comparator circuitry switches the sensitivity of the resistor-scaling network between the 12 VDC and 24 VDC ranges.

Claims

1. A system for determining whether a direct current voltage across a pair of terminals is within an acceptable lower absolute magnitude range, or within an acceptable higher absolute magnitude range, or in a forbidden zone outside either of these ranges, comprising means for scaling down the voltage across the terminals to provide a first voltage related in magnitude to the voltage across the terminals, means for establishing a reference direct current voltage, means for comparing the first related voltage to the reference voltage and for switching in response to comparison outcome, the comparing and switching means having a first state when the first related voltage corresponds to a voltage across the terminals which is within the acceptable lower absolute magnitude range, and second means for comparing a second voltage related in magnitude to the voltage across the terminals to the reference voltage to determine whether the voltage across the terminals is greater than the highest acceptable magnitude of the lower magnitude range by a predetermined amount and for switching in response to such comparison outcome, the second comparing means having a first state when the voltage across the terminals does not exceed the highest acceptable limit of the lower magnitude range by the predetermined amount and a second state when the voltage across the terminals exceeds the highest acceptable limit of the lower magnitude range by the predetermined amount, the second comparing means, when in its second state, scaling down the first related voltage.

2. A system for determining whether a direct current voltage across a pair of terminals is within an acceptable lower absolute magnitude range, or within an acceptable higher absolute magnitude range, or in a forbidden zone outside either of these ranges, comprising means for scaling the voltage appearing across the terminals, means for establishing a reference direct current voltage, means for comparing the scaled voltage to the reference voltage and for switching in response to comparison outcome, the comparing and switching means having a first state when the voltage across the terminals is within the acceptable lower absolute magnitude range and a second state when the voltage across the terminals is outside the acceptable lower absolute magnitude range, and second means for comparing the voltage across the terminals to the reference voltage to determine whether the voltage across the terminals is greater than a median of the lower absolute magnitude range and higher absolute magnitude range and for switching in response to such comparison outcome, the second comparing means having a first state when the voltage across the terminals is less than the median of the lower absolute magnitude range and the higher absolute magnitude range and a second state when the voltage across the terminals exceeds the median of the lower absolute magnitude range and the higher absolute magnitude range, the second comparing means, when in its second state, scaling the already once scaled voltage.

3. A system for determining whether a direct current voltage across a pair of terminals is within an acceptable lower absolute magnitude voltage range, or within an acceptable higher absolute magnitude voltage range, or in a forbidden zone outside either of these ranges, comprising means for establishing a reference voltage, first comparing means, means for coupling the voltage across the terminals to the first comparing means, the first comparing means comparing the voltage across the terminals as coupled thereto to the reference voltage and determining if the voltage across the terminals falls within the lower voltage range and providing an output signal indicative thereof, means for coupling the reference voltage establishing means to the first comparing means, second comparing means, and means for coupling the voltage across the terminals to the second comparing means, the second comparing means comparing the voltage coupled thereto to the reference voltage and scaling down the voltage coupled to the first comparing means when the voltage across the terminals exceeds an upper limit of the lower voltage range by a predetermined amount, the output signal of the first comparing means then indicating whether the voltage across the terminals falls within the higher voltage range.

4. The system of claim 3 wherein the means for coupling the voltage across the terminals to the first comparing means includes means for scaling down the voltage across the terminals, the second comparing means scaling down the already scaled down voltage when it determines that the voltage across the terminals exceeds the upper limit of the lower voltage range by the predetermined amount.

5. The system of claim 4 wherein the first comparing means comprises a comparator.

6. The system of claim 4 wherein the first comparing means comprises first and second comparators, and means for coupling the first and second comparators together.

7. The system of claim 5 wherein the means for coupling the voltage across the terminals to the first comparing means comprises a resistive voltage divider having a first resistance and a second resistance coupled together at a junction, the first and second resistances coupled across the terminals, the junction of the first and second resistances coupled to the first comparing means, means for resistively coupling the first resistance to the second comparing means, the second comparing means including means to couple a third resistance across the second resistance to scale down further the voltage coupled to the first comparing means when the second comparing means determines that the voltage across the terminals exceeds the upper limit of the lower voltage range by a predetermined amount.

8. The system of claim 6 wherein the means for coupling the voltage across the terminals to the first comparing means comprises first and second resistive voltage dividers, each having a first resistance and a second resistance coupled together at a junction, the first and second resistances coupled across the terminals and the junctions of the first and second resistances of the first and second voltage dividers, respectively, coupled to inputs of the first and second comparators, and means for coupling the first resistances to the second comparing means, the second comparing means including means for switching a third resistance across each of the second resistances when the second comparing means determines that the voltage across the terminals has exceeded the upper limit of the lower voltage range by the predetermined amount.