Identification device and method

• US 4,669,487 A
• Filed: 10/30/1985
• Issued: 06/02/1987
• Est. Priority Date: 10/30/1985
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Edward Frieling
• Original Assignee: Edward Frieling
• Inventors: Frieling, Edward
• Primary Examiner(s): Coven, Edward M.
• Application Number:
  US06/792,781
• Time in Patent Office: 580 Days
• Field of Search: 128/774, 128/782, 382/2, 382/4, 340/825.3, 340/825.34, 33/147 L, 33/147 N, 33/512
• US Class Current: 600/587
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 9/257 electronically G07C9/26 takes precedence

Abstract

A method and apparatus designed for verifying the identity of a person, for credit card authorization and other purposes, involves the measurement of the thickness of the knuckles and also the longitudinal distance between knuckles. The apparatus simultaneously takes a series of length and width measurements, and feeds them to a computer which is programmed to process the raw data and make comparisons to a standard previously recorded. Techniques for increasing the accuracy of the determination are also disclosed.

Claims

1. A method of verifying the identity of an unknown person, comprising the steps of:

selecting at least one test joint of at least one test finger of a known person;

measuring the thickness of said test joint;

storing said measurement;

measuring the same joint thickness dimension of an unknown person;

comparing said joint thickness dimensions of said known and unknown persons to determine the degree of similarity therebetween;

and deciding whether said degree of similarity is acceptable as an indication of identity according to a selected criterion.

2. A method as in claim 1 wherein the thicknesses of said test joint along two different axes are measured and compared and used as a basis for said decision.

3. A method as in claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

selecting a second finger joint of a known person to be a second test joint;

measuring the thickness of said second test joint;

storing said measurement;

measuring the same second test joint thickness dimension of said unknown person;

comparing said second test joint dimensions of said known and unknown persons to determine the degree of similarity therebetween;

and deciding whether said degree of similarity between said first and second test joint thicknesses is acceptable as an indication of identity according to a selected criterion.

4. A method as in claim 3 further comprising the steps of:

measuring the separation between said test joints of said known person;

storing said measurement;

measuring the same joint separation dimension of an unknown person;

comparing said joint separation dimensions of said known and unknown persons to determine the degree of similarity therebetween;

and deciding whether said degree of similarity between said first and second test joint thicknesses and said joint separations is acceptable as an indication of identity according to a selected criterion.

5. A method as in claim 4 wherein said comparison step comprises the steps of:

selecting a figure of merit;

incrementing said figure of merit by a selected amount when the absolute value of the difference between at least one pair of said test joint thickness dimensions is less than a selected first value;

and decrementing said figure of merit by a selected amount when the absolute value of said last mentioned difference is greater than a selected second value.

6. A method as in claim 1 further comprising a procedure for compensating for short-term changes in joint thickness, including the steps of:

selecting another finger joint of said test finger to be a reference joint;

measuring the thickness of said reference joint of said known person;

storing said reference joint measurement;

measuring the thickness of said reference joint of said unknown person;

calculating the difference between said reference joint thickness measurements;

algebraically adding said difference between said reference joint thickness measurements to said stored test joint thickness measurement to produce a corrected test joint thickness measurement;

and using said corrected test joint thickness measurement in said comparison step.

7. A method as in claim 6 wherein said reference joint is on a separate finger from said test finger, and corresponds to said test joint.

8. A method as in claim 1 further comprising a procedure for compensating for long-term changes in finger dimensions, including the steps of:

calculating the difference between said test joint thickness dimensions of said known and unknown persons;

modifying said stored test joint thickness dimension by algebraically adding thereto at least a selected fraction of said difference in the event that said criterion of identity is satisfied;

and thereafter using said modified test joint thickness dimension for subsequent comparisons.

9. A method as in claim 1 wherein:

said measuring steps include;

measuring the thickness of said test finger at a plurality of data points including the location of said test joint and a range of locations dispersed longitudinally of said test finger in front of and behind said test joint;

and measuring the position of each of said data point locations longitudinally of said test finger;

and said comparison step includes;

calculating respective comparison curves of a selected type which are peaked and which fit a selected range of said data points best for each of said persons;

determining respective peak values for said comparison curves as an indication of the thicknesses of said test finger joints for each of said persons;

and comparing said respective peak values for said persons to determine the degree of similarity therebetween;

and said deciding step includes deciding whether said degree of similarity between said peak values is acceptable as an indication of identity according to a selected criterion.

10. A method as in claim 9 wherein:

each said comparison curve has a standard equation including a set of coefficients;

and comparing said respective curve coefficients for said persons to determine the degree of similarity therebetween;

and said deciding step includes deciding whether said degree of similarity between said coefficients is acceptable as an indication of identity according to a selected criterion.

11. A method as in claim 10 wherein said comparison curve is a parabola of the form y=ax² +bx+c, and said coefficients compared are a, b and c.

12. A method as in claim 9 wherein:

said calculation of said comparison curves includes the steps of;

calculating respective preliminary curves of said selected type which fit respective selected ranges of said data points best for each of said persons;

establishing criteria of closeness between said preliminary curves and respective ranges of said data points in the vicinity of the peaks of said preliminary curves;

discarding any of said data points which do not meet said criteria;

and calculating said respective comparison curves to best fit the remaining data points for each of said persons.

13. A method as in claim 12 wherein said step of calculating each said preliminary curve comprises the steps of:

determining a peak data point from among all said data points;

and selecting said preliminary curve to pass through the undiscarded data points in the vicinity of said peak data point.

14. A method as in claim 13 wherein said step of determining a peak data point from among all of said data points comprises the steps of:

selecting a preliminary peak data point;

selecting a predetermined number of said data points on either side of said preliminary peak data point;

calculating the average coordinates of said preliminary peak data points and said selected points on either side thereof;

and employing said average coordinates as the coordinates of said peak data point about which said first curve is calculated.

15. A method as in claim 12 wherein said preliminary and comparison curves are parabolas.

16. A method as in claim 9 wherein said comparison curves ae parabolas.

17. A method as in claim 16 or 15 wherein the method of least square fit is used to fit said parabola to its constituent data points.

18. Apparatus for verifying the identity of an unknown person, comprising:

means for measuring the thickness of a test joint of a test finger of known and unknown persons respectively;

means for storing said test joint thickness dimension of said known person;

means for comparing said test joint thickness dimension of said unknown person to said stored dimension to determine the degree of similarity therebetween;

and means for determining whether said degree of similarity is acceptable as an indication of identity between said known and unknown persons according to a selected criterion.

19. Apparatus as in claim 18 wherein said measuring means comprises:

a pair of jaw means;

means movably mounting at least one of said jaw means for opening and closing movement with respect to the other;

means for opening said moveable jaw means to admit said finger therebetween;

means yieldably biasing said moveable jaw means toward a closed position whereby to follow the contours of said finger at it is moved longitudinally between said jaw means;

and transducer means responsive to said moveable jaw means for providing an electrical jaw displacement signal representing the instantaneous displacement of said moveable jaw means during said finger movement, whereby the profile of said jaw displacement signal during the time of said finger movement represents the thickness contour of said finger.

20. Apparatus as in claim 19 wherein:

said moveable jaw means comprises a slide member;

said mounting means comprises guideway means slideably mounting said slide member for linear motion of said moveable jaw means toward and away from the other of said jaw means.

21. Apparatus as in claim 20 wherein:

said transducer means is of the type requiring a rotary drive, and includes rotary drive gear means;

and said moveable jaw means has coupled thereto linear drive rack means in driving engagement with said rotary drive gear means for operation of said transducer means by said linear motion of said moveable jaw means.

22. Apparatus as in claim 20 further comprising:

solenoid means magnetically coupled to said slide member;

and means supplying alternating current energization to said solenoid means to apply a magnetic dither impulse to said slide member.

23. Apparatus as in claim 19 further comprising:

data processing means responsive to said jaw displacement signal and arranged to determine a peak value attained by each said thickness contour as a measure of the thickness of each said test joint;

said data processing means being arranged to compare said peak values relating to said known and unknown persons respectively and to determine the degree of similarity between the thicknesses of said test joints.

24. Apparatus as in claim 23 wherein:

said data processing means is arranged also to determine second peak values of each said thickness contour and to compare said second peak values relating to said known and unknown persons respectively, to determine the degree of similarity between the thicknesses of second test joints.

25. Apparatus as in claim 19 further comprising:

data processing means responsive to said jaw displacement signal and arranged to determine both first and second peak values attained by each said thickness contour as a measure of the thicknesses of said first and second test joints respectively;

means for sensing the degree of insertion of a finger into said apparatus;

and transducer means responsive to said finger insertion sensing means for providing an electrical signal proportional to said degree of finger insertion;

said data processing means being further arranged to receive said finger insertion signal, to determine the finger displacements which are correlated with each of said peak values of said thickness contours, and to substract said correlated finger displacement values from each other to calculate the separation between said test joints of each said person;

said data processing means being further arranged to compare said joint separation values relating to said known and unknown persons respectively, to determine the degree of similarity therbetween.

26. Apparatus as in claim 25 wherein:

said finger insertion sensing means comprises finger support means, and means mounting said finger support means for linear motion in response to insertion of a finger into said apparatus;

and said insertion-responsive transducer means is of the type requiring a linear drive, and including linear drive means coupled to said finger support means for linear movement therewith.

27. Apparatus as in claim 26 further comprising means for biasing said finger support means in a direction to oppose finger insertion.