Trailer for all-terrain vehicle

• US 4,683,970 A
• Filed: 04/17/1986
• Issued: 08/04/1987
• Est. Priority Date: 04/17/1986
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Ontario Drive and Gear, Ltd.
• Original Assignee: Ontario Drive and Gear, Ltd.
• Inventors: Smith, Morley L.
• Primary Examiner(s): Love, John J.
• Assistant Examiner(s): McGiehan, Donn
• Application Number:
  US06/853,228
• Time in Patent Office: 474 Days
• Field of Search: 180/210, 180/213, 180/215, 180/15, 180/16, 180/21, 180/9.26, 180/28, 180/30
• US Class Current: 180/15
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 11/14 having helical, spiral or coil springs only B60G11/006 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 9/02 the axle or housing being pivotally mounted on the vehicle , e.g. the pivotal axis being parallel to the longitudinal axis of the vehicle B60G9/003 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: B62D 55/04 with tracks and alternative ground wheels, e.g. changeable from endless track vehicle into wheeled vehicle and vice versa for multi-purpose tractors B62D49/0635

Abstract

The trailer disclosed is hitched to an all-terrain vehicle, particularly an all-terrain tricycle, not just by the conventional universal-swiveling trailer hitch but also by spring struts. The springs extend and converge forwards and upwards from the ends of the trailer axle to attachment points behind the seat of the vehicle. The springs aid in making the combined vehicle and trailer more manageable over rough ground. The springs especially curb a tendency of a tricycle when under power to rear up at the front. The invention is particularly for use when tracks are added between the trailer wheels and the vehicle wheels.

Claims

1. Detachable all-terrain trailer which is suitable for use with an all-terrain vehicle, characterised

in that the trailer includes a frame and a trailer axle;

in that the trailer includes left and right road wheels, one at each end of the trailer axle;

in that the trailer includes a hitching link, which is secured to the frame of the trailer;

in that the hitching link includes a hitching connection, which is suitable for attaching the link to a hitching point on the vehicle;

in that the hitching connection includes a universal-joint means, which is effective, when attached to the said hitching point, to permit the trailer to move, substantially freely, in a universal mode, i.e. in a pitch mode, in a roll mode, and in a yaw mode, relative to the vehicle;

in that the trailer includes a spring means;

in that the spring means is suitable for attachment to, and for operative engagement with, the rear of the vehicle;

in that the spring means is so constructed and arranged that the spring means acts, when attached to the vehicle;

(a) to resiliently urge the rear of the vehicle upwards, thereby to transfer some of the weight of the vehicle to the trailer; and

at the same time

(b) in the event that the trailer becomes deflected to right or left of the vehicle in the yaw mode, about the hitching connection, to resiliently urge and restore the trailer positively to a directly trailing position, in line behind the vehicle.

2. Combination of the trailer of claim 1 and the vehicle to which the trailer is attached, where the wheelbase of the vehicle is roughly equal in length to the distance between the rear axle of the vehicle and the axle of the trailer.

3. Trailer of claim 1, where the spring means comprises:

a left compression spring, which extends from a left spring-to-trailer attachment point, which is situated on the trailer near the left road wheel, forwards to a left spring-to-vehicle attachment point in the vehicle;

a right compression spring, which extends from a right spring-to-trailer attachment point, which is situated on the trailer near the right road wheel, forwards to a right spring-to-vehicle attachment point in the vehicle.

4. Trailer as claimed in claim 3, where the two springs (42, 43) converge towards the vehicle, in that the two spring-to-vehicle attachment points (47, 49) are closer together than the two spring-to-trailer attachment points (45, 46).

5. Trailer as claimed in claim 4, where the two spring-to-vehicle attachment points (47, 49) are spaced a substantial distance apart.

6. Trailer as claimed in claim 3, where the spring-to-vehicle attachment points (47, 49) are a substantial distance higher up on the vehicle than the hitching point (40).

7. Trailer as claimed in claim 3, where the spring-to-trailer attachment points (45, 46) are closely adjacent to the axis of rotation of the respective trailer wheels.

8. Trailer as claimed in claim 3, where the trailer includes an adjusting means (50;

60) for adjusting longitudinally the position of the hitching connection (40) relative to the trailer axle (34).

9. Trailer as claimed in claim 3, where the trailer includes a load platform (52).

10. Trailer as claimed in claim 9, where there is substantially no provision for the trailer axle to undergo suspension movement relative to the load platform.

11. Trailer as claimed in claim 3, where the trailer axle (34) is so arranged that the respective axes of rotation of the two road wheels (35, 36) are solidly constrained to remain co-axial at all times.

12. Trailer as claimed in claim 3, where the hitching link (37;

64) is so solidly secured to the trailer (32) that substantially no relative pitching movement can take place between the trailer axle (34) and the hitching link (37;

     64).

13. Trailer as claimed in claim 3, where the hitching link (37;

64) is so solidly secured to the trailer that substantially no relative yawing movement can take place between the trailer axle (34) and the hitching link.

14. Trailer as claimed in claim 3, where the hitching link is so secured to the trailer that relative yawing movement can take place between the trailer axle and the hitching link.