Methods of servicing an elevator system

• US 4,697,243 A
• Filed: 07/25/1985
• Issued: 09/29/1987
• Est. Priority Date: 07/25/1985
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Inventio AG (Schindler Holding AG)
• Original Assignee: Westinghouse Electric Company LLC (Brookfield Asset Management Incorporated)
• Inventors: Trosky, William J., Gutowski, Charles M., Butler, Thomas A., Moore, William H.
• Primary Examiner(s): Smith, Jerry
• Assistant Examiner(s): Lastova, John R.
• Application Number:
  US06/758,984
• Time in Patent Office: 796 Days
• Field of Search: 364/513, 364/200, 364/900, 364/184, 340/825.3, 340/825.34, 340/19 R, 187/29 R, 178/4.1 B, 178/22.01, 178/22.08, 179/1.5 R, 179/2 DP, 179/18 D, 179/2 CA
• US Class Current: 706/59
• CPC Class Codes: B66B 5/0087 Devices facilitating maintenance, repair or inspection tasks devices incorporated in the buffer B66B5/288; railings on top of the car B66B11/0226
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/2257 using expert systems
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 25/02 of industrial processes; of machinery
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 706/918 Elevator

Abstract

A method of integrating an expert system having a knowledge base of elevator trouble-shooting information into the working environment of elevator service personnel, without special training of such personnel, and without compromising the security of the knowledge base. The method includes an interactive initialization procedure which includes successive, successful user and knowledge base initiated communication links between the user and knowledge base, before actual access to the knowledge base is permitted.

Claims

1. A method in which an expert system having a knowledge base of elevator trouble-shooting information may be used interactively, as a consultant, by any number of remotely located elevator service personnel without requiring special training in the use of expert systems, and without compromising the security of the knowledge base, comprising the steps of:

providing a knowledge base of elevator trouble-shooting information, including a rule network having rules in evidence-hypothesis format,

enabling contact to be made with said knowledge base from any number of remote elevator system locations via communication means,

limiting access to said knowledge base to authorized users,

establishing a communication link between an authorized user located at a remote elevator system and the knowledge base via the communication means,

initiating an interactive exchange session between the user and knowledge base via the communication link,

said interactive session including the steps of;

displaying an elevator system malfunction menu, selecting a symptom from the menu, and running an inference engine using the selected symptom to traverse the rule network,

asking the user to provide evidence unavailable to the knowledge base which is required to propagate belief through the rule network in an effort to determine a probable cause of the selected symptom,

said asking step including the step of providing the user with a specific code related to the evidence required by the knowledge base,

accessing the elevator system for evidence via a programmable terminal,

said accessing step including the step of entering the specific code provided to the user by the knowledge base,

said accessing step further including the step of obtaining a plurality of evidence bits from the elevator system in response to the coded entry, some of which may be immediately utilized by the knowledge base to propagate belief through the rule network and some of which may be subsequently utilized during subsequent belief propagations through the rule network,

computing the age of each of such bit of evidence before it is used by the knowledge base,

comparing the computed age with a predetermined value,

and asking the user if the evidence should be updated when the age exceeds the predetermined value.

2. The method of claim 1 including the step of outputting a probable cause of the selected symptom, the confidence level of the diagnosis, and suggested corrective action.

3. The method of claim 1 including the step of keeping a record of the interactive exchange session between the user and knowledge base, notwithstanding interrupted communications between the user and the knowledge base, enabling the session to be reinitiated without the necessity of repeating prior steps associated with entry of evidence.

4. The method of claim 3 including the step of displaying the stored record for user review upon command by the user.

5. The method of claim 4 including the step of providing an opportunity for the user to change previously input evidence in the stored record.

6. The method of claim 3 including the step of keeping a record of interrupted sessions for each authorized user, stepping through the interrupted sessions for an identified user, when there is more than one, and providing an opportunity for the user to select an interrupted session to be resumed.

7. The of claim 1 including the step of keeping a record of the interactive exchange session, initiating an error mode when the user wishes to change evidence previously input, stepping back through the previously input evidence in response to the user initiated user error mode, and enabling the user to change previously input evidence.