Method of reducing the effect of narrowband jammers in radio communication between two stations

• US 4,716,573 A
• Filed: 11/08/1985
• Issued: 12/29/1987
• Est. Priority Date: 11/19/1984
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
• Original Assignee: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
• Inventors: Herolf, Knut O. M., Bergstrom, Bo C.
• Primary Examiner(s): Griffin, Robert L.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Chin, Stephen
• Application Number:
  US06/796,297
• Time in Patent Office: 781 Days
• Field of Search: 375/1, 375/2.1, 375/2.2, 375/34, 375/58, 370/79, 370/110.1, 370/93, 370/104, 455/62, 455/69, 371/34, 371/109
• US Class Current: 375/132
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 1/7143 Arrangements for generation of hop patterns
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 2001/7154 with means for preventing interference

Abstract

A method for reducing the effect of narrowband jammers in communication between two stations utilising frequency hopping. A new frequency at a hop is not selected merely with the aid of random number generation, but also with learnt knowledge of the radio communication surroundings affecting the selection. The frequencies (f_l . . . f_n) available for frequency hopping are stored with different status in a list (X). The status of the different frequencies is determined by quality measurement of the channel selected in a radio communication, and by examining the status of the selected frequency (f_x) in relation to the status of the remaining frequencies (f_l . . . f_n).

Claims

1. A method for reducing the effect of narrowband jammers in communication between a first station (A) and a second station (B) across a radio channel having a varying transmission quality in dependence on said jammers by using frequency hopping which includes periodically changing a transmitting frequency (fx) from the first station (A) to the second station (B) and a transmitting frequency (fy) from the second station (B) to the first station (A) with a given period (Th), there being randomly generated a plurality of fixed frequencies (F₁, . . . f_n) available for the frequency hopping, each of said frequencies having mutually different or equal status values indicative of giving disturbance free or acceptable communication across said radio channel, a characteristic signal being sent from said first station (A) to said second station (B) on one of said fixed frequencies (f₁, . . . f_n) to test the channel quality for that frequency with respect to said jammers when communicating between said stations (A,B), measuring the result of the test of said quality in said second station (B), transmitting said result from said second station (B) and receiving the same in the first station (A) in a form such that the result is not affected by said jammers, entering the result as a status value for said frequency (fx), and deciding in dependence on said status value whether said frequency should be used as a transmitting frequency (fx) or if a second frequency should be chosen as a communicating frequency, said second frequency representing a mapping frequency obtained from a previous measurement giving disturbance free communication.

2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the quality of said channel is measured by comparing the signal received in said second station (B) corresponding to said characteristic signal transmitted from said first station (A) with its counterpart in said second station (B) identical to said characteristic signal, coding the result of the comparison so as not to be affected by said jammers, and transmitting the result from the second station (B) to the first station (A).

3. A method as claimed in claim 2 wherein said characteristic signal is transmitted from said first station (A) an received by said second station (B) together with the information intended to be communicated between said stations (A,B).

4. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said status value can assume three different levels for each of said randomly generated frequencies (f₁, . . . f_n), said levels including a first level indicating an acceptable radio channel for that frequency, a second level indicating a non-acceptable radio channel and a third level indicating a slip in the two frequencies (f_x, f_y) used between the first station and the second station, and between the second and first station, respectively.