Method for monitoring a work vehicle suspension

• US 4,744,239 A
• Filed: 11/28/1986
• Issued: 05/17/1988
• Est. Priority Date: 11/28/1986
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Caterpillar Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Caterpillar Incorporated
• Inventors: Gudat, Adam J., Kyrtsos, Christos T., Lutgen, F. Paul
• Primary Examiner(s): Levy, Stewart J.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Raevis, Robert R.
• Application Number:
  US06/935,870
• Time in Patent Office: 536 Days
• Field of Search: 73/118.1, 73/11, 340/52 R
• US Class Current: 73/11.07
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 17/0185 for failure detection
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2300/02 Trucks; Load vehicles
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2300/026 Heavy duty trucks
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2300/07 Off-road vehicles
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2400/204 Vehicle speed
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2400/51 in suspension unit
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2400/52 in tyre
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2400/60 Load
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2600/02 Retarders, delaying means, dead zones, threshold values, cut-off frequency, timer interruption
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2600/04 Means for informing, instructing or displaying
• CPC Class Codes: B60G 2600/08 Failure or malfunction detecting means
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 17/04 Suspension or damping

Abstract

Off-highway trucks generally rely on a suspension system which employs a plurality of gas-over-liquid type struts. These struts are critical to proper operation of the vehicle such that a single collapsed strut can have serious manifestations in structural damage, tire wear, and payload monitor accuracy. These consequences can be mitigated by an accurate and reliable strut monitor. Pressure type sensors are disposed on each of the struts and their pressure is monitored during three critical phases of operation. These phases include static, loading, and roading modes and each mode requires a distinct method for detecting a collapsing strut. The presence of a collapsing strut, detected by any of the three methods, is communicated to the vehicle operator whereby operation can be immediately suspended. The system avoids the serious consequences of vehicle operation with a collapsed strut by providing the operator with immediate and positive feedback on the condition of the struts.

Claims

1. A method for detecting a collapsed strut of a work vehicle having a plurality of left and right strut mounted wheels, comprising:

periodically sensing the internal pressure of each of the struts and delivering a plurality of first signals each having a magnitude correlative to the internal pressure of each respective strut;

calculating ratios of the first signals of selected pairs of the struts;

comparing the magnitude of each of the ratios to an upper and lower setpoint and delivering a second signal in response to at least one of the ratios being outside the upper and lower setpoints; and

delivering a third signal indicative of a collapsed strut in response to receiving the second signal.

2. A method, as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of calculating the ratios of the first signals of selected pairs of struts includes calculating the ratios of the first signals of selected front struts relative to the first signals of selected rear struts.

3. A method, as set forth in claim 2, wherein the step of calculating ratios includes calculating the ratio of the left front and right rear first signals and calculating the ratio of the right front and left rear first signals.

4. A method, as set forth in claim 1, wherein the step of comparing includes comparing the magnitude of each of the ratios to distinct corresponding pairs of upper and lower setpoints and delivering the second signal in response to the magnitude of at least one of the ratios being outside the respective upper and lower setpoints.

5. A method, as set forth in claim 4, including the step of calculating the upper setpoints corresponding to each respective ratio at the beginning of the life of the vehicle by increasing the calculated ratios of the first signals by a preselected percentage, and storing the ratios as the respective upper setpoints of each ratio.

6. A method, as set forth in claim 4, including the step of calculating the lower setpoints corresponding to each respective ratio at the beginning of the life of the vehicle by decreasing the calculated ratios of the first signals by a preselected percentage, and storing the ratios as the respective lower setpoints of each ratio.

7. A method, as set forth in claim 1, including the step of preventing calculation of the ratios in response to movement of the vehicle.

8. A method, as set forth in claim 1, including the step of preventing comparing the ratios in response to movement of the vehicle.