Elevator system graceful degradation of bank service

• US 4,765,442 A
• Filed: 10/16/1987
• Issued: 08/23/1988
• Est. Priority Date: 10/16/1987
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Inventio AG (Schindler Holding AG)
• Original Assignee: Westinghouse Electric Company LLC (Brookfield Asset Management Incorporated)
• Inventors: Blain, Jeffrey W., Shah, Denis D., Chen, Jean
• Primary Examiner(s): Shoop, Jr., William M.
• Assistant Examiner(s): NOT, DEFINED
• Application Number:
  US07/109,639
• Time in Patent Office: 312 Days
• Field of Search: 187/101, 187/102, 187/124
• US Class Current: 187/247
• CPC Class Codes: B66B 1/2433 For elevator systems with a single shaft and multiple cars
• CPC Class Codes: B66B 1/343 Fault-tolerant or redundant control system configuration
• CPC Class Codes: B66B 2201/102 Up or down call input
• CPC Class Codes: B66B 2201/211 Waiting time, i.e. response time

Abstract

An elevator control system and method for efficient failure control with a local area network on the traveling cable and distributed electronic control circuits in the car and proximate to the respective floors with a remote microprocessor controller for each car. A local area network communicates with the corridor fixtures in a serial signal format of input and output signals. Each remote controller includes a microprocessor based computer circuit which communicates over a multicar-link with the other and also over the local area networks for car and hall calls to implement an expanded control strategy with interactive program modes with least restrictive capability. This program interacts with programs for floor control strategy and bank control strategy for the elevator system to select the best car and the most efficient operation, despite failures which would otherwise degrade the bank operation sooner and more restrictively.

Claims

1. A method of controlling a plurality of elevator cars for providing continuous and less noticeably restricted elevator service to each floor of a building, with each car having its car call signals communicating on a local area network from an electronic circuit located with each car through a separate traveling cable to a remote controller,

each remote controller including a microprocessor based computer circuit individual to each car and with each remote controller also communicating corridor signal information on a local area network through a riser cable terminating in a set of floor control circuits distributed proximate to each floor,

each said microprocessor based computer circuit being inherently capable of implementing progressive failure control modes interactive with a floor control strategy to assign the better car or cars into operation, based on communication network integrity, relative car travel positions and timing, to respond to the hall calls registered at the floors along said cable riser,

each said remote controller, concurrently with its response in the strategy for hall calls, controlling the car response individual to its registered car calls for service to the floors, and

each said remote controller repeatedly checking its operational capability and communication signal integrity on the corridor cable riser so as to be available to assume implementing the least restrictive failure control mode for the floor control strategy should there be a failure affecting the remote controller priority of operation.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of each remote controller microprocessor based computer circuit communicating corridor signal information over a local area network is implemented by bidirectionally communicating in serial signal transmission format through the riser cable or hallway serial link for so long as it is a viable network, as determined by the checking step for implementing the floor control strategy to respond to the registered hall calls.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of elevator cars is in a two-car-pair operating system and each car with its associated remote controller microprocessor based computer circuit is capable of singularly implementing an expanded floor control (FC) master strategy inherent to the hall call response for said two-car-pair, after a remote controller is selected by said repeated checking step, the selected controller implementing the floor control strategy by assigning the better car or both cars into operation to respond to the hall calls registered at the floors, for so long as a communication path is viable, while controlling the car response individual to its car calls local to the car.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of elevator cars is in an operating system including a plurality of two-car-pair sets of cars, and each car within each set is associated with a remote controller microprocessor based computer circuit which is capable of singularly implementing an expanded bank control (BC) master strategy inherent to the hall call response for said plural two-car-pair operating system after a remote controller is selected by said repeated checking step, the selected controller becoming BC master and implementing the floor control strategy by assigning the best car or cars into operation to respond to the hall calls registered at the floors for so long as a communication path is viable, while controlling the car response individual to its car calls from the associated car.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of elevator cars is in an operating system including a plurality of two-car-pair sets of cars and each car within each set is associated with a remote controller microprocessor based computer circuit which is capable of singularly implementing an expanded floor control (FC) master strategy and an expanded bank control (BC) master strategy for the hall call response for said plural two-car-pair operating system, after a remote controller is selected by said repeated checking step in each respective two-car-pair set in order to provide a respective FC master in each two-car-pair set,

then continuously checking if multi-car communication is operational between the FC master of one and the other two-car-pair, and if failing this then checking if communicating on a third local area network between remote controllers of each two-car-pair if non-operational, thereupon checking if the FC master of the remaining two-car-pair is operational to thereby assign the BC master strategy to this remaining FC master unless it is not operational,

whereupon the FC master assignment is transitioned to the other remote controller of the remaining two-car-pair to implement the floor control strategy, for so long as multi-car communication is viable, while controlling the car response individual to its car calls from the associated car.

6. A control system for controlling a plurality of elevator cars to provide less noticeably restricted and continuous elevator service to each floor of a building, comprising:

a first local area network for each car having its car call signals communicating thereon and including an electronic circuit located with each car connected to a remote controller on a traveling cable, each remote controller including a microprocessor based computer circuit, for the car,

a second local area network for each remote controller to communicate corridor signal information through a riser cable terminating in a set of floor control circuits distributed proximate to each floor,

each said microprocessor based computer circuit being adapted to implement progressive failure control modes interactively with a floor control strategy to assign the better car or cars into operation, based on communication network signal integrity, relative car travel positions and timing, to respond to the hall calls registered at the floors along said cable riser,

each said remote controller, concurrently with its strategy for answering hall calls, controls the car response individual to its registered car calls for service to the floors, and

each said remote controller computer circuit including means for repeatedly checking its operational capability and the communication signal integrity on the corridor cable riser within the control system so as to be immediately available to assume implementing the least restricted failure control mode for the floor control strategy should there be a failure affecting the remote controller priority of operation.

7. The control system of claim 6, wherein each car serially communicates with its respective remote controller over the local area network implemented by bi-directionally communicating in serial signal transmission format over its respective traveling cable, for so long as network signal viability exists, the information relating to car call registration and the responsive car travel transition.

8. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein said plurality of elevator cars is in an operating system including a plurality of two-car-pair sets of cars and each car within each set is associated with a remote controller, microprocessor based computer circuit which is capable of singularly implementing an expanded bank control (BC) master strategy inherent to the hall call response for said plural two-car-pair operating system, after a remote controller is selected by said means repeatedly checking its operational capability, the selected controller becoming BC master and implementing the floor control strategy by assigning the best car or cars into operation to respond to the hall calls registered at the floors, for so long as a communication path is viable, while controlling the car response individual to its car calls from the associated car.

9. The control system of claim 6, wherein each remote controller microprocessor based computer circuit is adapted for serially communicating corridor signal information over the local area network is implemented by bi-directionally communicating in serial signal transmission format through the riser cable or halllway serial link for so long as it is a viable network, as determined by the checking means for implementing the floor control strategy to respond to the registered hall calls.

10. The control system of claim 9, wherein said plurality of elevator cars is in a two-car-pair operating system and each car associated microprocessor based computer circuit is capable of singularly implementing an expanding floor control (FC) master strategy inherent to the hall call strategy for said two-car-pair after a remote controller is selected by said means repeatedly checking its operational capability, the selected controller implementing the floor control strategy by assigning the better car or both cars into operation to respond to hall calls registered at the floors for so long as a commuication path is viable, while controlling the car response individual to its car calls local to the car.