Doppler radar kinemometer

• US 4,791,424 A
• Filed: 01/06/1987
• Issued: 12/13/1988
• Est. Priority Date: 01/15/1986
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Jeumont-Schneider Corporation
• Original Assignee: Jeumont-Schneider Corporation
• Inventors: Pore, Jacques
• Primary Examiner(s): Sikes, William L.
• Assistant Examiner(s): NOT, DEFINED
• Application Number:
  US07/000,586
• Time in Patent Office: 707 Days
• Field of Search: 343/711, 343/712-715, 343/879, 342/111, 342/112, 342/113, 342/117
• US Class Current: 343/711
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/60 wherein the transmitter and receiver are mounted on the moving object, e.g. for determining ground speed, drift angle, ground track G01S13/64 takes precedence

Abstract

The invention concerns a Doppler radar kinemometer intended to measure the speed of a railway vehicle. According to the invention, it includes two antennas (1,2) mechanically connected to one another such that their axes form a determined angle between them. This angle is preferably between 60° and 120°. For safety operation, the antennas are each supplied with ultrahigh frequency waves (F1,F2) by their own wave generators (4,5), and each furnishes corresponding Doppler frequencies (Fd1,Fd2) to a distinct processing unit (11,12), with the signals coming from these two processing units then processed within a computing assembly (15) which supplies the value of the measured velocity.

Claims

1. A Doppler radar kinemometer, comprising a first Doppler radar antenna and a second Doppler radar antenna mechanically connected to one another with respective axes thereof at a predetermined angle between 60°

and 120°

;

a first wave generator and signal processor assembly connected to said first antenna;

a second wave generator and signal processor assembly independent of said first assembly and connected to said second antenna;

the wave generator of said first assembly supplying ultrahigh frequency first waves of a first predetermined frequency to said first antenna, and said signal processor of said first assembly receiving the Doppler frequency of said first waves as received by said first antenna;

the wave generator of said second assembly supplying ultrahigh frequency second waves of a second predetermined frequency different from said first frequency to said second antenna, and said signal processor of said second assembly receiving the Doppler frequency of said second waves as received by said second antenna;

each said signal processor providing an output representing the corresponding Doppler frequency; and

a computer connected to said signal processors and calculating velocity based on the respective outputs thereof.

2. Radar kinemometer according to claim 1, unique in that each said antenna is configured such that the opening angle of the lobe of the ultrahigh frequency waves thereof is between 5°

and 8°

.

3. Radar kinemometer according to claim 1, unique in that each of said antennas is a parabolic, fixed-frequency cavity antenna.

4. Radar kinemometer according to claim 1, unique in that the computer receives in addition signals emitted by a coded phonic wheel.

5. Radar kinemometer according to claim 1, unique in that the computer receives in addition signals characterizing the respective processing units.

6. Radar kinemometer according to claim 1, unique in that each of the two processing units is supplied with electric current by a corresponding separate converter.

7. Radar kinemometer according to claim 1, unique in that said antennas and said wave generator and signal processor assemblies are housed together within a single case.

8. Radar kinemometer according to claim 7 unique in that the said case includes a heating mechanism which maintains temperature within said case.

9. Radar kinemometer according to claim 7 unique in that said case includes a radioelectric shield interposed between the said antennas and said wave generator and signal processor assemblies.

10. Radar kinemometer according to claim 2 unique in that said opening angle is about 5.5°

.

11. Radar kinemometer according to claim 1 unique in that said first and second predetermined frequencies differ by about 2%.