Inhibit control of a belted vehicular passive restraint system having door-mounted retractors

• US 4,796,916 A
• Filed: 12/16/1987
• Issued: 01/10/1989
• Est. Priority Date: 12/16/1987
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: General Motors Corporation (Motors Liquidation Co. GUC Trust)
• Original Assignee: General Motors Corporation (Motors Liquidation Co. GUC Trust)
• Inventors: Rogers, Lloyd W., Compeau, David E.
• Primary Examiner(s): Mitchell, David M.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Weaver, Ross
• Application Number:
  US07/134,171
• Time in Patent Office: 391 Days
• Field of Search: 280/803, 280/806, 280/807, 297/480, 242/107.4 A, 242/107.4 B
• US Class Current: 280/803
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 22/08 having the belt retractor mounted on or in a vehicle closure, e.g. the door
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 22/41 with additional means for preventing locking during unwinding under predetermined conditions

Abstract

Each vehicle door in which a retractor is mounted includes a jamb switch mounted in the door jamb for sensing actual opening of the door, and a lock switch mounted in the door lock assembly for sensing actuation of the interior or exterior door handles. When door opening or closure is indicated, locking of the retractors is inhibited for a predetermined interval. Logical agreement between the lock and jamb switches is required to maintain the inhibit beyond the predetermined interval while the door is open. If agreement is not achieved within the interval, a switch failure is presumed, and the inhibit is removed to permit normal locking of the retractors. If such agreement is achieved, the inhibit is maintained until closure of the door, and thereafter for another predetermined interval. If the switches fail to remain in agreement after closure of the door, further operation of the inhibit on subsequent opening of the door is disabled.

Claims

1. In a motor vehicle seat belt system including a seat belt retractor mounted on a vehicle door, a motion sensitive mechanism for preventing belt movement through the retractor in response to a sensed motion, and a desensitizing mechanism energizable to inhibit operation of said motion sensitive mechanism, control apparatus for controlling energization of said desensitizing mechanism, comprising:

first and second switch means mounted in relation to the vehicle door for independently sensing and indicating closure or nonclosure of the vehicle door;

monostable means effective when either of said first and second switch means indicates nonclosure of the vehicle door for energizing said desensitizing mechanism for at least a predetermined interval; and

means effective in response to a condition wherein if both of said first and second switch means indicate nonclosure of the vehicle door within the predetermined interval of energization effected by said monostable means, then the energization of said desensitizing means is sustained so long as such condition persists, but if both of said first and second switch means do not indicate nonclosure of the vehicle door within the predetermined interval of energization effected by said monostable means, then the desensitizing means is deenergised.

2. The apparatus set forth in claim 1, wherein the vehicle door includes a jamb and a latch mechanism, said first switch means is mounted in relation to said jamb, and said second switch means is mounted in relation to said latch mechanism.

3. In a motor vehicle seat belt system including a seat belt retractor mounted on a vehicle door, a motion sensitive mechanism for preventing belt movement through the retractor in response to a sensed motion, and a desensitizing mechanism energizable to inhibit operation of said motion sensitive mechanism, control apparatus for controlling energization of said desensitizing mechanism, comprising:

first and second switch means mounted in relation to the vehicle door for independently sensing and indicating closure or nonclosure of the vehicle door;

monostable means effective when triggered to energize said desensitizing mechanism for a predetermined interval;

trigger means for triggering said monostable means to energize said desensitizing mechanism at the onset of a nonclosure indication by either of said first and second switch means; and

latch means effective (1) in response to a sensed normal condition wherein both of said first and second switch means indicate nonclosure of the vehicle door within the interval of energization effected by said monostable means, for latching said monostable means to sustain the energization of said desensitizing means so long as such normal condition persists, and (2) in response to a sensed failure condition wherein one of said first and second switch means fails to indicate nonclosure of the vehicle door within the interval of energization effected by said monostable means, for permitting the energization of said desensitizing mechanism to terminate upon expiration of said predetermined interval.

4. The apparatus set forth in claim 3, wherein said monostable means is effective after being latched by said latch means to maintain the energization of said desensitizing means for an additional predetermined interval after said first or second switch means indicates closure of said vehicle door.

5. The apparatus set forth in claim 3, wherein the trigger means is disabled upon closure of the vehicle door in a switch failure condition in which one of said first and second switch means fails to indicate such door closure, thereby to disable further energization of said desensitizing mechanism so long as such failure condition persists.

6. In a motor vehicle seat belt system including a seat belt retractor mounted on a vehicle door, a motion sensitive mechanism for preventing belt movement through the retractor in response to a sensed motion, and a desensitizing mechanism energizable to inhibit operation of said motion sensitive mechanism, apparatus for controlling energization of said desensitizing mechanism, comprising:

first and second switch means mounted in relation to the vehicle door for independently sensing and indicating closure or nonclosure of the vehicle door;

monostable means including flip-flop means effective when triggered to energize said desensitizing mechanism, timer means effective when fully charged for maintaining the energization effected by said flip-flop means for a predetermined interval following such energization, and charging means for maintaining said timer means in a fully charged condition prior to the energization of said desensitizing mechanism;

trigger means for triggering said flip-flop means at the onset of a nonclosure indication by either of said first and second switch means; and

latch means effective (1) in response to a sensed normal condition wherein both of said first and second switch means indicate nonclosure of the vehicle door within the interval of energization effected by said monostable means, for maintaining said timer means in a fully charged condition so long as such condition persists, and (2) in response to a sensed switch failure condition wherein one of said first and second switch means fails to indicate nonclosure of the vehicle door within the interval of energization effected by said monostable means, for permitting the energization of said desensitizing mechanism to terminate upon expiration of said predetermined interval.

7. The apparatus set forth in claim 6, wherein the trigger means is disabled upon closure of the vehicle door in a switch failure condition in which one of said first and second switch means fails to indicate such door closure, thereby to disable further energization of said desensitizing mechanism so long as such failure condition persists.