Pulse doppler surveillance post signal processing and scan to scan correlation

• US 4,816,833 A
• Filed: 06/16/1987
• Issued: 03/28/1989
• Est. Priority Date: 06/16/1987
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Northrop Grumman Corporation
• Original Assignee: Westinghouse Electric Company LLC (Brookfield Asset Management Incorporated)
• Inventors: Ferguson, Kenneth H., Gatlin, Bobby J., Ehrman, James P., Real, Philip, Conroy, Joseph L.
• Primary Examiner(s): Blum, Theodore M.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Barron, Jr., Gilbarto
• Application Number:
  US07/062,912
• Time in Patent Office: 651 Days
• Field of Search: 342/95, 342/108, 342/115, 342/195, 364/516, 364/517
• US Class Current: 342/95
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/20 whereby multiple time-around echoes are used or eliminated
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/5246 post processors for coherent MTI discriminators, e.g. residue cancellers, CFAR after Doppler filters
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/72 for two-dimensional tracking, e.g. combination of angle and range tracking, track-while-scan radar

Abstract

Post detection processing for a pulse doppler surveillance radar is disclosed wherein target reports having ambiguous ranges along with those containing unambiguous ranges are used for tracking targets. The tracking includes a maneuver recognition mechanism for adaptively weighting the range, range rate, and X and Y coordinate driving errors as a function of the maneuvering and non-maneuvering operations of the target.

Claims

1. A method of processing detected signals from a pulse Doppler radar system for automatically tracking targets, wherein said system has a directional antenna that scans in azimuth repetitively collecting return signals from respective targets during successive scans of the antenna, said method comprising:

determining the range and Doppler shift of each return signal exceeding a selected threshold level during each dwell of the antenna to constitute a detected signal;

correlating detected signals on successive dwells of the antenna;

forming candidate target reports having an unambiguous range and ambiguous ranges in accordance with the number of correlated detected signals;

selecting target reports from the candidate target reports, said target reports selected having an amplitude sum of correlated signals meeting a criterion corresponding to a predetermined beam-shaped modulation; and

tracking the movement of selected unambiguous and ambiguous range target reports during successive scans of the antenna.

2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the step of forming candidate target reports includes forming said reports from the correlation of detected signals on each of three out of three modulation periods, two out of two modulation periods, and two out of three modulation periods.

3. A method according to claim 1 wherein the step of forming the candidate target reports includes the substeps of:

forming candidate target reports having a plurality of ambiguous ranges from the correlation of detected signals on two out of three and two out of two modulation periods; and

forming candidate target reports having an unambiguous range from the correlation of detected signals on three out of three modulation periods.

4. A method according to claim 1 wherein the step of selecting candidate target reports includes:

rejecting two out of three correlations at times when the intervening modulation period is not range gate eclipsed; and

rejecting two out of two correlations at times when an adjacent modulation is not range gate eclipsed and the sum of the amplitudes fail to meet a predetermined criterion.

5. A method of processing signals for a pulse Doppler surveillance radar system, comprising:

determining the range and Doppler shift of each return signal exceeding a selected threshold level during each dwell of the antenna;

correlating successive detected signals from different PRF'"'"'s to form categories of target reports, said categories including a (3/3) category of candidate target reports formed by three consecutive detected signals, a (2/2) category of candidate target reports formed by two consecutive detected signals, a (2/3) category of candidate target reports formed by two detected signals out of three dwells of the antenna, said (2/2) and (2/3) categories of candidate target reports having up to four ambiguous ranges;

linking selected combinations of said categories of candidate target reports having the same range and Doppler in accordance with the number of missed detections in successive modulation periods between each candidate target report, the selected combination of target links including the extension of said categories in accordance with the difference between the number of modulation periods from the beginning of a first report (M) to the beginning of the next report (N) in accordance with the formula N-M as follows;

space="preserve" listing-type="tabular">______________________________________ Modulation Periods Extensions Between Report Types ______________________________________ (3/3) to (3/3) 1 (3/3) to (2/3) 1 (2/3) to (3/3) 2 (2/3) to (2/2) 1 (2/3) to (2/3) 2 (2/2) to (2/3) 2 (2/2) to (2/2) 4 ______________________________________

and resolving in azimuth closely spaced targets in accordance with said linked combinations.

6. A method according to claim 5 further comprising, determining the number of individual target reports, including the substeps of:

outputting one target report for two to five successive detected returns;

outputting two target reports for eight consecutive detected returns; and

outputting selectively either one target report or two target reports for successive detected returns less than eight and greater than five as a function of the amplitude of the return.

7. A method according to claim 6 wherein the substep of outputting selectively either one or two target reports, comprises:

outputting two target reports for six consecutive detections at times when the second successive detection has an amplitude greater than the third successive detection amplitude by a preselected ratio, and the fifth successive detection has an amplitude greater than the fourth successive detection, and the ratio of the second detection to the fourth detection is within a preselected range.

8. A method according to claim 6 wherein the substep of outputting selectively either one or two target reports, comprises:

outputting two target reports for seven consecutive detections at times when the second detection has an amplitude greater than the amplitude of the third successive detection by a pre-selected ratio, and the sixth detection has an amplitude greater than the fourth successive detection by a preselected ratio and the fourth successive detection has an amplitude less than the fifth successive detection.

9. A method according to claim 6 wherein the substep of outputting selectively either one or two target reports, comprises:

outputting two target reports for seven consecutive detections at times when the sixth successive detection has an amplitude greater than the fifth detection amplitude by a preselected ratio and the second detection has an amplitude greater than the fourth successive detection by a selected ratio and the amplitude of the fourth detection is less than the amplitude of the third detection.

10. A method of processing detected signals from a pulse Doppler radar system for automatically tracking targets wherein said system has a directional antenna that scans in azimuth repetitively collecting return signals from respective targets during successive scans of the antenna, said method comprising:

determining the range and Doppler shift of each return signal exceeding a selected threshold level using successive PRF detected signals to form candidate target reports;

identifying candidate target reports having the same Doppler and either ambiguous or unambiguous ranges within one range gate of each other; and

rejecting one of said identified candidate target reports in accordance with a predetermined criterion to reject range ghosts occurring as a result of multiple detections at the same Doppler, said rejecting step including the substeps of comparing unambiguous target reports to determine adjacent range gates of individual detections;

and eliminating ambiguous target reports occupying identical range gates at times when an unambiguous pair of target reports has consecutive detections in adjacent range gates.

11. A method according to claim 10 wherein the step of rejecting further includes the substeps of:

comparing unambiguous target reports to determine the occurrence of three unambiguous target reports with at least two detections in adjacent range gates; and

eliminating unambiguous and ambiguous target reports having at least two detections occupying identical range gates of said (3/3) unambiguous target report having detections in adjacent range gates.

12. A method according to claim 10 wherein the step of rejecting further includes the substeps of:

comparing ambiguous target reports to determine the occurrence of pairs of ambiguous target reports occupying adjacent range gates;

eliminating single ambiguous target reports occupying the same range as one of said adjacent pairs.

13. A method of automatically tracking detected targets in a pulse Doppler surveillance radar having a directional antenna that scans in azimuth for detecting targets during successive scans, said method comprising the steps of:

comparing uncorrelated ambiguous and unambiguous target reports from a current scan of the antenna with uncorrelated target reports formed during preceding scans of the antenna to initiate a tentative track in response to a correlation of said reports;

comparing said target reports from the current scan of the antenna with tentative tracks initiated during preceding scans of the antenna to form an established track in response to correlation of a target report with a tentative track; and

eliminating tentative tracks failing to correlate with a target report within a selected azimuth zone after a selected number of scans of the antenna, said eliminating step including the substeps of eliminating a tentative track failing to correlate with a target report having an unambiguous range after a first selected number of scans at times when said track is initiated by a pair of target reports having ambiguous ranges; and

eliminating a tentative track failing to correlate with an ambiguous range target report after a second selected number of scans less than said first selected number at times when said tentative track is initiated by ambiguous range target reports.

14. A method of tracking targets according to claim 13 further comprising:

storing uncorrelated target reports for a selected number of scans of the antenna; and

determining the size of an azimuth zone for each uncorrelated report as a function of the number of antenna scans the report is stored.

15. A method of tracking targets according to claim 13 further comprising:

correlating ambiguous and unambiguous range, range rate, and azimuth of target reports;

comparing the actual range change with range prediction based on range rate and the time difference of the target reports being correlated; and

rejecting initiation of a tentative track at times when the actual range change and predicted range change of the current and preceding reports are outside of a selected distance of the target reports.

16. A method of tracking targets according to claim 13 further comprising:

predicting during a current scan of the antenna, the coordinates of a target report for the subsequent scan for correctly assigning the target report to a track during said subsequent scan, said step of predicting including the substep of;

adaptively weighting the range, range rate, X and Y coordinate driving errors as a function of the operation of a target during the current scan where the driving errors are formed by subtracting the predicted values for the current scan from the actual values obtained from the target report during said current scan.

17. A method of tracking targets in a pulse Doppler radar surveillance system having a directional antenna that scans in azimuth for collecting return signals from respective targets during successive scans, said method comprising the steps of:

detecting for each range the Doppler of each detected signal having a selected threshold level;

correlating for each range the Doppler of successive detected signals during each scan of the antenna;

correlating successive detected returns to provide candidate target reports having ambiguous and unambiguous ranges;

processing candidate target reports to provide selected target reports meeting a preselected criterion for outputting both ambiguous and unambiguous range type target reports;

processing in selected azimuth zones successively output target reports of both range types during a current scan of the antenna and output target reports formed during preceding scans of the antenna for initiating tentative tracks;

associating tentatively in said azimuth zones output target reports produced during a current scan with tracks initiated during a preceding scan;

selecting a tentative association to provide a firm track correlation, said step of selecting including the substep of prioritizing the output target reports for a respective tentative track at times when more than one target output report is tentatively associated with such track;

predicting the coordinates of an output target report for a respective track in a succeeding scan in accordance with selected weight values of the range, range rate, X coordinate and Y coordinate driving errors of the output target report selected for the firm correlation of such track on the current scan, said step of predicting in accordance with selected weight values including the substeps of storing a plurality of non-maneuvering weight values, each corresponding to range, range rate, position and velocity for tracking a target in the smoothing mode;

storing a plurality of maneuver weight values, each corresponding to range, range rate, position and velocity for tracking a target in the maneuver mode;

checking during each current scan of the antenna the mode utilized in predicting the coordinates of the target report for a respective track in a preceding scan of the antenna;

comparing to respective first distinct values during each scan of the antenna the computed driving error values for each output target report having the non-maneuver weight values utilized in predicting the coordinates;

comparing to respective second distinct values during each scan of the antenna the computed driving error values for each output target report having the maneuver weight values utilized in predicting the coordinates;

using maneuver weight values in predicting coordinates for target reports having at least one driving error exceeding said first distinct values for at least two successive scans of the antenna, and exceeding said second distinct values subsequent to said two successive scans, and having all driving error values less than said second distinct values for a selected number of successive scans of the antenna; and

selecting the weight values in accordance with the weight values used on the preceding scan and the driving errors of the firmly correlated target report on the current scan of the antenna.

18. A method of tracking according to claim 17 wherein the step of selecting weight values comprises the further substep of:

comparing to third distinct values during each scan of the antenna the computed driving error values for each output target report having the maneuver weight values utilized in predicting coordinates and having driving error values less than said second distinct values for a selected number of successive scans of the antenna;

changing from the maneuver weight values to the smooth weight values for targets having driving error values less tha the third distinct values upon the expiration of said selected number of scans of the antenna; and

delaying the changing from the maneuver weight to the smooth weight values for an additional scan succeeding said selected number for target reports having at least one driving error value greater than a respective said third distinctive value and during successive scans of the antenna subsequent to said selected number of scans.

19. A method of tracking targets according to claim 18 wherein the selected number of successive scans for utilizing maneuver weight values in predicting coordinates is comprised of a function of the magnitude of the driving error relative to said first distinct values for target reports having non-maneuver weight values used in predicting the coordinates, and wherein the predicted coordinates made with non-maneuver weights on the scan preceding the one where the maneuver weights are selected are corrected to predicted coordinates made with maneuver weights, and wherein the driving errors for the scan where the maneuver weights are selected are recomputed using these corrected predicted coordinates.

20. A method of tracking targets according to claim 19 wherein the first distinct values are each a multiple of a statistical value corresponding to random errors in a given type driving error for non-maneuver mode target reports and the second and third distinct values are each a different multiple of a statistical value corresponding to random errors in a given type driving error for maneuver mode target reports.

21. A method of tracking targets in a surveillance radar system having a scanning antenna, said method comprising:

sampling values of range, range rate, and azimuth angle for each target during successive scans of the antenna;

storing a plurality of non-maneuver weight values, each corresponding to range, range rate, position, and velocity for tracking a target in a non-maneuver mode;

storing a plurality of maneuver weight values, each corresponding to range, range rate, position, and velocity for tracking a target in a maneuver mode;

computing a driving error value for each of the sampled target values during a current scan of the antenna by subtracting corresponding predicted target values for the current scan from said respective sampled target values;

computing a predicted value for each of the sampled target values for a succeeding scan of the antenna by adding to a corresponding predicted value for a current scan of the antenna, the product of the computed driving error value and a corresponding weight value selected from one of said non-maneuver and maneuver plurality of stored weight values;

selecting one of said non-maneuver and maneuver plurality of weight values for multiplying with a driving error value during a current scan of the antenna in accordance with the weight values used on the preceding scan and the magnitude of the computed driving error values during the current scan of the antenna, said selecting step including the substeps of checking during each current scan of the antenna the selected one of the non-maneuver and maneuver plurality of weight values utilized in computing the predicted target values during a preceding scan;

comparing during the current scan of the antenna the computed driving error values for each target to respective first distinct predetermined values at times when the non-maneuver plurality of weight values are utilized in computing the predicted target values;

and changing the weight values from the non-maneuver plurality to the maneuver plurality in computing the predicted target values of respective target for the succeeding scan at times when the driving error values of said target for said preceding scan and the current scan of the antenna are both of a predetermined comparison to said respective first distinct predetermined values; and

tracking non-maneuvering and maneuvering targets during successive scans of the antenna in accordance with the correlation of the sampled target values and the corresponding computed predicted target values.

22. A method of tracking targets according to claim 21 wherein the step of selecting the maneuver plurality of weight values further comprises the substeps of:

determining the magnitude of the driving error value relative to a distinct predetermined value for a respective target corresponding to said predetermined comparison;

24. A method of tracking targets according to claim 21 wherein the step of selecting one of the non-maneuver and maneuver plurality of weight values comprises the substeps of:

checking during each current scan of the antenna the selected one of the non-maneuver and maneuver plurality of weight values used in computing the predicted target values during a preceding scan;

comparing to second distinct predetermined values, driving error values of each target having the maneuver plurality of weight values used in computing its predicted values during the preceding scan of the antenna;

increasing the number of subsequent scans of the antenna a selected number of scans to a predetermined number for using the maneuver plurality of weight values in predicting target values for said target with any driving error magnitude greater than respective second distinct predetermined values;

decreasing the number of subsequent scans of the antenna a selected number of scans for using the maneuver plurality of weight values in predicting target values for said target with all driving error magnitudes less than respective second distinct predetermined values;

comparing the driving error values with third distinct values during the final of said selected number of scans for using the maneuver plurality of weight values;

selecting the non-maneuver plurality of weight values for computing the predicted target values of said target having all driving error magnitudes less than said third distinct values; and

delaying the selection of the smooth pluraltity of weight values to a succeeding scan of the antenna for a target having any driving error magnitude greater than said third distinct values.

25. A method of tracking targets according to claim 21 wherein the first distinct values are each a multiple of a statistical value corresponding to random errors in a given type driving error for non-maneuver mode targets and the second and third distinct values are each a different multiple of a statistical value corresponding to random errors in a given type driving error for maneuver mode targets.

23. selecting the number of subsequent consecutive scans of the antenna for using the maneuver plurality of weight values in predicting target values for said target in accordance with the determined relative magnitude;

correcting the predicted target values made on a preceding scan with the use of non-maneuver weights to predicted values made with the maneuver weights; and

recomputing the driving errors for the current scan in accordance with the corrected predicted target values.