Article removal control system
-
0Associated
Cases -
0Associated
Defendants -
0Accused
Products -
129Forward
Citations -
0
Petitions -
1
Assignment
First Claim
1. An article removal control system for enabling removal of a given article only by a given authorized user from a facility which has:
- (a) an article inventory control system which responds to inputs including user identification data and article identification data to issue an article removal authorization signal, and(b) an electronic article surveillance system which controls removal of the article by detecting within an interrogation zone a sensitized electronically detectable marker secured to the article;
the article removal control system comprising;
(c) an article removal authorization signal receiver and(d) means responsive to the article removal authorization signal for initiating removal of the given article, comprising(1) a measurer of a characteristic of the given article,(2) a receiver of a coded input signal representing the measured characteristic,(3) a comparer of the measured characteristic and the coded input signal, which produces a verification signal if they are substantially equal, and(4) an enabler which upon receipt of the verification signal enables the initiation of the removal of the given article.
1 Assignment
0 Petitions

Accused Products

Abstract
A system for controlling removal of articles from a facility by authorized users transmits data to, and receives data from, an article inventory control system and an electronic article surveillance system, either or both of which may be pre-existing. The inventive system comprises a terminal which identifies the user and article, transmits the user and article identification data to the article inventory control system, receives article removal authorization data from the article inventory control system, verifies the identity and number of articles to be removed, and enables the user to remove the article through the electronic article surveillance system. The preferred embodiment is adapted for a library, and is designed to provide library patrons with the ability to check books out of the library without staff assistance.
133 Citations
Radio frequency identification method and system of distributing products | ||
Patent #
US 7,967,199 B2
Filed 07/24/2009
|
Current Assignee
Promega Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Promega Corporation
|
Key Device for Monitoring Systems | ||
Patent #
US 20110084840A1
Filed 10/01/2010
|
Current Assignee
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC.
|
Radio frequency identification method and system of disturbing products | ||
Patent #
US 7,942,321 B2
Filed 06/08/2004
|
Current Assignee
Promega Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Promega Corporation
|
Controller arrangement for an optical sensing pen | ||
Patent #
US 8,022,943 B2
Filed 05/08/2008
|
Current Assignee
Silverbrook Research Pty Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Silverbrook Research Pty Limited
|
Radio frequency identification systems applications | ||
Patent #
US 8,006,902 B2
Filed 08/15/2007
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
RF point of sale and delivery method and system using communication with remote computer and having features to read a large number of RF tags | ||
Patent #
US 8,025,228 B2
Filed 10/31/2007
|
Current Assignee
Promega Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Promega Corporation
|
System for processing financial transactions in a self-service library terminal | ||
Patent #
US 8,002,182 B2
Filed 04/03/2009
|
Current Assignee
Bibliotheca RFID Library Systems AG
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
RFID reader enclosure and man-o-war RFID reader system | ||
Patent #
US 8,031,072 B2
Filed 04/13/2010
|
Current Assignee
Promega Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Promega Corporation
|
RFID DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM INCLUDING AN RFID READER HAVING A LIMITED TRANSMIT TIME AND A TIME-OUT PERIOD TO PROTECT A MEDICAL DEVICE AGAINST RFID-ASSOCIATED ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE | ||
Patent #
US 20100123547A1
Filed 09/24/2009
|
Current Assignee
Greatbatch Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Greatbatch Limited
|
RF point of sale and delivery method and system using communication with remote computer and having features to read a large number of RF tags | ||
Patent #
US 7,661,591 B2
Filed 10/01/2004
|
Current Assignee
Promega Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Promega Corporation
|
DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | ||
Patent #
US 20100073134A1
Filed 06/14/2006
|
Current Assignee
Dai Nippon Printing Company Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Dai Nippon Printing Company Limited
|
Applications for radio frequency identification systems | ||
Patent #
US 7,728,732 B2
Filed 12/23/2008
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
RFID reader enclosure and man-o-war RFID reader system | ||
Patent #
US 7,710,275 B2
Filed 03/16/2007
|
Current Assignee
Promega Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Promega Corporation
|
Radio frequency identification method and system of distributing products | ||
Patent #
US 7,784,689 B2
Filed 05/05/2006
|
Current Assignee
Promega Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Promega Corporation
|
Self-checkout system with anti-theft deactivation device | ||
Patent #
US 7,672,871 B2
Filed 02/28/2002
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu America Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Fujitsu Frontech North America Incorporated
|
RFID point of sale and delivery method and system | ||
Patent #
US 7,791,479 B2
Filed 11/13/2006
|
Current Assignee
Promega Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Promega Corporation
|
Systems And Arrangements For Object Identification | ||
Patent #
US 20100039682A1
Filed 08/18/2009
|
Current Assignee
Waterloo Industries Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Waterloo Industries Incorporated
|
Radio frequency identification method and system of distributing products | ||
Patent #
US 7,735,732 B2
Filed 06/24/2004
|
Current Assignee
Promega Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Promega Corporation
|
TRANSIENT VOLTAGE SUPPRESSION CIRCUIT FOR AN IMPLANTED RFID CHIP | ||
Patent #
US 20100191306A1
Filed 03/01/2010
|
Current Assignee
Greatbatch Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Greatbatch Limited
|
Hard cover product with concealed security device | ||
Patent #
US 7,557,717 B2
Filed 06/12/2007
|
Current Assignee
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
Radio frequency identification method and system of distributing products | ||
Patent #
US 7,591,421 B2
Filed 10/12/2005
|
Current Assignee
Promega Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Promega Corporation
|
RFID data collection and use | ||
Patent #
US 7,588,185 B2
Filed 06/07/2001
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Intermediate cover board with concealed security device for hard cover product | ||
Patent #
US 7,605,703 B2
Filed 11/06/2006
|
Current Assignee
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
Hard cover product with spine-disposed concealed security device | ||
Patent #
US 7,602,300 B2
Filed 06/04/2007
|
Current Assignee
Smartguard LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Smartguard LLC
|
KEYBOARD WITH A PROJECTION | ||
Patent #
US 20090256805A1
Filed 04/15/2009
|
Current Assignee
PrehKeyTec GmbH
|
Sponsoring Entity
PrehKeyTec GmbH
|
Application for a radio frequency identification system | ||
Patent #
US 7,619,529 B2
Filed 05/08/2003
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Object tracking method and system with object identification and verification | ||
Patent #
US 7,317,393 B2
Filed 11/21/2003
|
Current Assignee
Key Control Holding Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Key Control Holding Incorporated
|
Shopping system having user interactive identity and product items | ||
Patent #
US 7,383,984 B2
Filed 08/15/2007
|
Current Assignee
Silverbrook Research Pty Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Silverbrook Research Pty Limited
|
Hard Cover Product With Concealed Security Device | ||
Patent #
US 20080143537A1
Filed 06/12/2007
|
Current Assignee
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
Hard cover product with concealed security device | ||
Patent #
US 7,411,499 B2
Filed 04/14/2005
|
Current Assignee
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
Controller Arrangement For An Optical Sensing Pen | ||
Patent #
US 20080204429A1
Filed 05/08/2008
|
Current Assignee
Silverbrook Research Pty Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Systems and methods for the self-checkout of secured items from a lending establishment | ||
Patent #
US 7,461,784 B2
Filed 06/05/2006
|
Current Assignee
BIBLIOTHECA ITG LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
VERNON LIBRARY SUPPLIES INC.
|
Applications for radio frequency identification systems | ||
Patent #
US 7,471,205 B2
Filed 08/24/2006
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Intermediate cover board with concealed security device for hard cover product | ||
Patent #
US 20070052228A1
Filed 11/06/2006
|
Current Assignee
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
Radio frequency identification method and system of distributing products | ||
Patent #
US 7,258,276 B2
Filed 10/16/2001
|
Current Assignee
Promega Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Promega Corporation
|
Authenticating Signals and Identification and Security Documents | ||
Patent #
US 20070201720A1
Filed 02/15/2007
|
Current Assignee
Digimarc Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Digimarc Corporation
|
Radio frequency identification systems applications | ||
Patent #
US 7,270,268 B2
Filed 04/05/2006
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Card for facilitating user interaction | ||
Patent #
US 7,270,266 B2
Filed 04/02/2004
|
Current Assignee
Silverbrook Research Pty Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Silverbrook Research Pty Limited
|
Shopping System having User Interactive Identity and Product Items | ||
Patent #
US 20070272735A1
Filed 08/15/2007
|
Current Assignee
Silverbrook Research Pty Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Silverbrook Research Pty Limited
|
Shopping receptacle with in-built scales | ||
Patent #
US 7,296,737 B2
Filed 04/02/2004
|
Current Assignee
Silverbrook Research Pty Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Silverbrook Research Pty Limited
|
Radio frequency identification method and system of distributing products | ||
Patent #
US 7,293,705 B2
Filed 03/09/2004
|
Current Assignee
Promega Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Promega Corporation
|
Hard Cover Product With Spine-Disposed Concealed Security Device | ||
Patent #
US 20070285257A1
Filed 06/04/2007
|
Current Assignee
Dale Nichols
|
Sponsoring Entity
Dale Nichols
|
Application for radio frequency identification systems | ||
Patent #
US 6,448,886 B2
Filed 03/13/2001
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Application for a radio frequency identification system | ||
Patent #
US 6,600,420 B2
Filed 07/19/2001
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Identification tag with enhanced security | ||
Patent #
US 6,646,554 B1
Filed 08/14/2000
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Applications for radio frequency identification systems | ||
Patent #
US 6,486,780 B1
Filed 07/19/2000
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Object tracking method and system with object identification and verification | ||
Patent #
US 6,707,381 B1
Filed 06/26/2002
|
Current Assignee
Key Control Holding Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Keytrak Inc.
|
Applications for radio frequency identification systems | ||
Patent #
US 7,123,151 B2
Filed 04/20/2004
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Applications for radio frequency identification systems | ||
Patent #
US 6,768,419 B2
Filed 05/20/2002
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Inventory system using articles with RFID tags | ||
Patent #
US 6,693,539 B2
Filed 11/29/2000
|
Current Assignee
Thomas J. Clare, John H. Bowers
|
Sponsoring Entity
Thomas J. Clare, John H. Bowers
|
Applications for radio frequency identification systems | ||
Patent #
US 6,232,870 B1
Filed 08/05/1999
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Applications for radio frequency identification systems | ||
Patent #
US 6,424,262 B2
Filed 03/13/2001
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Applications for radio frequency identification systems | ||
Patent #
US 7,113,094 B2
Filed 12/01/2005
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Radio frequency identification systems applications | ||
Patent #
US 7,044,373 B1
Filed 08/05/1999
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Identification tag with enhanced security | ||
Patent #
US 6,154,137 A
Filed 06/08/1998
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Inventory system using articles with RFID tags | ||
Patent #
US 5,963,134 A
Filed 07/24/1997
|
Current Assignee
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC., Mitsubishi Materials Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
|
Inventory system using articles with RFID tags | ||
Patent #
US 6,195,006 B1
Filed 08/27/1999
|
Current Assignee
Thomas J. Clare, John H. Bowers
|
Sponsoring Entity
Thomas J. Clare, John H. Bowers
|
Application for a radio frequency identification system | ||
Patent #
US 6,335,686 B1
Filed 08/05/1999
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Data mining technique for enhancing library-space management | ||
Patent #
US 20060064417A1
Filed 09/20/2004
|
Current Assignee
International Business Machines Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
International Business Machines Corporation
|
Intelligent antitheft method and system combining magnetic tags and smart cards | ||
Patent #
US 7,015,790 B1
Filed 05/07/1999
|
Current Assignee
Lenovo PC International Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Lenovo Singapore Pte Limited
|
System and method for automatically logging article use and an article adapted for such | ||
Patent #
US 6,867,698 B2
Filed 12/08/2000
|
Current Assignee
HERBERT MCIVOR HOLDINGS PTY LTD. AN AUSTRALIAN COMPANY
|
Sponsoring Entity
HERBERT MCIVOR HOLDINGS PTY LTD. AN AUSTRALIAN COMPANY
|
Inventory management system | ||
Patent #
US 20050104733A1
Filed 09/28/2004
|
Current Assignee
Meadwestvaco
|
Sponsoring Entity
Meadwestvaco
|
Hard cover product with concealed security device | ||
Patent #
US 20050237202A1
Filed 04/14/2005
|
Current Assignee
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
System and method for securing mobile equipment | ||
Patent #
US 20050287986A1
Filed 06/29/2004
|
Current Assignee
Intel Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Intel Corporation
|
Identification of mounting locations of sub-systems in mounting units | ||
Patent #
US 6,724,315 B2
Filed 01/02/2002
|
Current Assignee
Google LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
International Business Machines Corporation
|
Inventory management system | ||
Patent #
US 20040070507A1
Filed 10/11/2002
|
Current Assignee
Meadwestvaco
|
Sponsoring Entity
Meadwestvaco
|
Object tracking method and system with object identification and verification | ||
Patent #
US 20040113786A1
Filed 11/21/2003
|
Current Assignee
Key Control Holding Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Key Control Holding Incorporated
|
Paper roll anti-theft protection | ||
Patent #
US 20040145479A1
Filed 11/12/2003
|
Current Assignee
EASTERN RIBBON AND ROLL CORP.
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
System and method for verifying surveillance tag deactivation in a self-checkout station | ||
Patent #
US 6,788,205 B1
Filed 08/30/2002
|
Current Assignee
NCR Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
NCR Corporation
|
Inventory management system | ||
Patent #
US 6,801,130 B2
Filed 10/11/2002
|
Current Assignee
Meadwestvaco
|
Sponsoring Entity
Meadwestvaco
|
Shopping receptacle with in-built scales | ||
Patent #
US 20040195317A1
Filed 04/02/2004
|
Current Assignee
Silverbrook Research Pty Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Silverbrook Research Pty Limited
|
Merchandise inventory management system | ||
Patent #
US 6,834,800 B2
Filed 06/26/2002
|
Current Assignee
VANTEC RF SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
|
Sponsoring Entity
LEADING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC.
|
Card for facilitating user interaction | ||
Patent #
US 20040238627A1
Filed 04/02/2004
|
Current Assignee
Silverbrook Research Pty Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Merchandise inventory management system | ||
Patent #
US 20030015586A1
Filed 06/26/2002
|
Current Assignee
VANTEC RF SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
|
Sponsoring Entity
VANTEC RF SOLUTIONS CORPORATION
|
Complete integrated self-checkout system and method | ||
Patent #
US 6,507,279 B2
Filed 06/06/2001
|
Current Assignee
Tyco Fire Security GmbH
|
Sponsoring Entity
Sensormatic Electronics Corporation
|
System and method for automatically logging artcle use and an article adapted for such | ||
Patent #
US 20030076220A1
Filed 10/03/2002
|
Current Assignee
HERBERT MCIVOR HOLDINGS PTY LTD. AN AUSTRALIAN COMPANY
|
Sponsoring Entity
HERBERT MCIVOR HOLDINGS PTY LTD. AN AUSTRALIAN COMPANY
|
Paper roll anti-theft protection | ||
Patent #
US 6,653,940 B2
Filed 12/14/2001
|
Current Assignee
Eastern Ribbon Roll Corp. Clearwater FL, Eastern Ribbon Roll Corp.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Eastern Ribbon Roll Corp. Clearwater FL, Eastern Ribbon Roll Corp.
|
Article inventory tracking apparatus and method | ||
Patent #
US 6,438,447 B1
Filed 07/01/1998
|
Current Assignee
3M Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Company
|
Self-checkout system with anti-theft deactivation device | ||
Patent #
US 20020123932A1
Filed 02/28/2002
|
Current Assignee
Fujitsu America Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Fujitsu America Inc.
|
Security tag deactivation system | ||
Patent #
US 6,476,720 B2
Filed 10/02/2001
|
Current Assignee
ATS MONEY SYSTEMS INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
De La Rue Cash Processing Solutions Limited
|
Object proximity/security adaptive event detection | ||
Patent #
US 6,492,905 B2
Filed 08/20/2001
|
Current Assignee
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
|
Self-checkout/self-check-in RFID and electronics article surveillance system | ||
Patent #
US 6,169,483 B1
Filed 05/04/1999
|
Current Assignee
Sensormatic Electronics LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Sensormatic Electronics Corporation
|
Point-of sale reader and electronic article surveillance tag deactivator interface | ||
Patent #
US 6,281,796 B1
Filed 10/29/1999
|
Current Assignee
Sensormatic Electronics LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Sensormatic Electronics Corporation
|
Transponder identification and record assembly | ||
Patent #
US 6,297,727 B1
Filed 05/05/1997
|
Current Assignee
George N. Nelson Jr
|
Sponsoring Entity
George N. Nelson Jr
|
Object proximity/security adaptive event detection | ||
Patent #
US 6,300,872 B1
Filed 06/20/2000
|
Current Assignee
Philips Electronics North America Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Philips Electronics North America Corporation
|
Security tag deactivation system | ||
Patent #
US 6,333,692 B1
Filed 07/05/2000
|
Current Assignee
Talaris Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
De La Rue Cash Processing Solutions Limited
|
RFID tags which are virtually activated and/or deactivated and apparatus and methods of using same in an electronic security system | ||
Patent #
US 6,025,780 A
Filed 07/25/1997
|
Current Assignee
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC.
|
Book binding, machine, and method for incorporating electronic article surveillance marker into a book | ||
Patent #
US 6,094,137 A
Filed 04/22/1998
|
Current Assignee
Brandon B. Rasch, Arnan R. Rasch
|
Sponsoring Entity
Brandon B. Rasch, Arnan R. Rasch
|
Self-checkout, point-of-transaction system including deactivatable electro-optically coded surveillance tags | ||
Patent #
US 6,102,290 A
Filed 07/10/1998
|
Current Assignee
Symbol Technologies Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Symbol Technologies Inc.
|
Apparatus and method for the optical detection of multiple items on a platform | ||
Patent #
US 6,142,375 A
Filed 04/10/1998
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Item removal system and method | ||
Patent #
US 5,886,634 A
Filed 05/05/1997
|
Current Assignee
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP
|
Sponsoring Entity
Electronic Data Systems Corporation
|
Self-checkout point-of-transaction system including deactivatable electro-optically coded surveillance tags | ||
Patent #
US 5,979,758 A
Filed 06/12/1998
|
Current Assignee
Symbol Technologies Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Symbol Technologies Inc.
|
Electronic article security system for store which uses intelligent security tags and transaction data | ||
Patent #
US 5,745,036 A
Filed 09/12/1996
|
Current Assignee
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC., Mitsubishi Materials Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC.
|
Article inventory tracking and control system | ||
Patent #
US 5,777,884 A
Filed 10/16/1995
|
Current Assignee
3M Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Company
|
Self-checkout, point-of-transaction system including removable, electro-optically coded surveillance tags | ||
Patent #
US 5,814,799 A
Filed 11/12/1996
|
Current Assignee
Symbol Technologies Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Symbol Technologies Inc.
|
Self-checkout, point-of-transaction system including deactivatable electro-optically coded surveillance tags | ||
Patent #
US 5,594,228 A
Filed 07/27/1992
|
Current Assignee
Symbol Technologies Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Symbol Technologies Inc.
|
Electronic article surveillance system with adaptive filtering and digital detection | ||
Patent #
US 5,602,531 A
Filed 05/07/1996
|
Current Assignee
3M Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Company
|
Materials monitoring systems, materials management systems and related methods | ||
Patent #
US 5,671,362 A
Filed 04/04/1995
|
Current Assignee
Alan B. Cowe, Roland Werres
|
Sponsoring Entity
Alan B. Cowe, Roland Werres
|
Working asset management system and method | ||
Patent #
US 5,664,113 A
Filed 12/10/1993
|
Current Assignee
General Dynamics C4 Systems Incorporated
|
Sponsoring Entity
Motorola Inc.
|
Method and apparatus for automatically desensitizing sensor elements of protected articles | ||
Patent #
US 5,500,640 A
Filed 04/25/1995
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Company
|
Electronic article surveillance system having enhanced tag deactivation capacity | ||
Patent #
US 5,469,142 A
Filed 08/10/1994
|
Current Assignee
Tyco Fire Security GmbH
|
Sponsoring Entity
Sensormatic Electronics Corporation
|
Deactivating device for magnetic markers in an electronic article surveillance system | ||
Patent #
US 5,477,202 A
Filed 06/27/1995
|
Current Assignee
3M Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Company
|
Library check out/check in system | ||
Patent #
US 5,288,980 A
Filed 06/25/1992
|
Current Assignee
KINGSLEY LIBRARY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
|
Sponsoring Entity
KINGSLEY LIBRARY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
|
Deactivating device for deactivating EAS dual status magnetic tags | ||
Patent #
US 5,341,125 A
Filed 01/15/1992
|
Current Assignee
Sensormatic Electronics LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
Sensormatic Electronics Corporation
|
Article removal control system | ||
Patent #
US 5,260,690 A
Filed 07/02/1992
|
Current Assignee
3M Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Company
|
Electronic inventory label and security apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 5,151,684 A
Filed 04/12/1991
|
Current Assignee
TAGLOCK TECHNOLOGIES LLC CO ED JOHNSEN
|
Sponsoring Entity
Edward L. johnsen
|
Electronic article surveillance system incorporating an auxiliary sensor | ||
Patent #
US 5,030,941 A
Filed 12/27/1989
|
Current Assignee
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC.
|
Method and apparatus for integrated data capture and electronic article surveillance | ||
Patent #
US 5,059,951 A
Filed 11/14/1988
|
Current Assignee
FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC.
|
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THE SELF-CHECKOUT OF SECURED ITEMS FROM A LENDING ESTABLISHMENT | ||
Patent #
US 20070278297A1
Filed 06/05/2006
|
Current Assignee
BIBLIOTHECA ITG LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
BIBLIOTHECA ITG LLC
|
RF point of sale and delivery method and system using communication with remote computer and having features to read a large number of RF tags | ||
Patent #
US 8,113,425 B2
Filed 04/14/2011
|
Current Assignee
Promega Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Promega Corporation
|
RFID detection and identification system including an RFID reader having a limited transmit time and a time-out period to protect a medical device against RFID-associated electromagnetic interference | ||
Patent #
US 8,115,600 B2
Filed 09/24/2009
|
Current Assignee
Greatbatch Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Greatbatch Limited
|
Hard cover product with concealed printed security device | ||
Patent #
US 8,072,330 B1
Filed 05/21/2009
|
Current Assignee
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
Radio frequency identification method and system of distributing products | ||
Patent #
US 8,231,053 B2
Filed 05/05/2011
|
Current Assignee
Promega Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Promega Corporation
|
RFID reader enclosure and man-o-war RFID reader system | ||
Patent #
US 8,258,961 B2
Filed 09/07/2011
|
Current Assignee
Promega Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Promega Corporation
|
System for processing financial transactions in a self-service library terminal | ||
Patent #
US 8,322,614 B2
Filed 07/19/2011
|
Current Assignee
Bibliotheca RFID Library Systems AG
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Book product with concealed security device | ||
Patent #
US 8,334,774 B2
Filed 02/19/2012
|
Current Assignee
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
Microchip System and Method for Operating a Locking Mechanism and for Cashless Transactions | ||
Patent #
US 20130006479A1
Filed 07/06/2012
|
Current Assignee
Gerald G. Anderson
|
Sponsoring Entity
Gerald G. Anderson
|
Book product with concealed security device | ||
Patent #
US 8,350,705 B1
Filed 06/10/2011
|
Current Assignee
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
Sponsoring Entity
SMARTGUARD LLC
|
DISTRIBUED SENSOR METHODS AND ARRANGEMENTS | ||
Patent #
US 20130035984A1
Filed 10/10/2012
|
Current Assignee
Digimarc Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Digimarc Corporation
|
Key device for monitoring systems | ||
Patent #
US 8,378,826 B2
Filed 10/01/2010
|
Current Assignee
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC.
|
Automobile keyless entry system having an RFID interrogator | ||
Patent #
US 8,410,899 B2
Filed 02/09/2012
|
Current Assignee
Greatbatch Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Greatbatch Limited
|
Retail product tracking system, method, and apparatus | ||
Patent #
US 8,452,868 B2
Filed 09/21/2010
|
Current Assignee
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC.
|
Applications for radio frequency identification systems | ||
Patent #
US 8,502,673 B2
Filed 03/25/2010
|
Current Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Innovative Properties Company
|
Configurable monitoring device | ||
Patent #
US 8,508,367 B2
Filed 12/01/2009
|
Current Assignee
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC.
|
Sponsoring Entity
CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS INC.
|
RFID interrogator configured for protection against electromagnetic interference of a remote device having an RFID tag | ||
Patent #
US 8,581,694 B2
Filed 03/07/2013
|
Current Assignee
Greatbatch Limited
|
Sponsoring Entity
Greatbatch Limited
|
SYSTEM FOR SECURING AN INVENTORY WITHIN RETAIL PREMISES | ||
Patent #
US 20140197237A1
Filed 03/23/2014
|
Current Assignee
Charles E. Davis
|
Sponsoring Entity
Charles E. Davis
|
System and method for identifying one or more objects hung from a display peg | ||
Patent #
US 9,123,018 B2
Filed 03/13/2014
|
Current Assignee
T-Ink Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
T-Ink Inc.
|
RF point of sale and delivery method and system using communication with remote computer and having features to read a large number of RF tags | ||
Patent #
RE46326E1
Filed 01/22/2015
|
Current Assignee
Promega Corporation
|
Sponsoring Entity
Promega Corporation
|
RF point of sale and delivery method and system using communication with remote computer and having features to read a large number of RF tags | ||
Patent #
RE47599E1
Filed 06/14/2017
|
Current Assignee
-
|
Sponsoring Entity
-
|
Computer controlled key management system | ||
Patent #
US 4,661,806 A
Filed 05/10/1985
|
Current Assignee
Gilbert A. Peters, Mitchell J. Brooks
|
Sponsoring Entity
Gilbert A. Peters, Mitchell J. Brooks
|
Method and apparatus for monitoring keys and other articles | ||
Patent #
US 4,595,922 A
Filed 12/10/1984
|
Current Assignee
Richard G. Cobb
|
Sponsoring Entity
Richard G. Cobb
|
Library circulation control system | ||
Patent #
US 4,141,078 A
Filed 10/14/1975
|
Current Assignee
Innovated Systems Inc.
|
Sponsoring Entity
Innovated Systems Inc.
|
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETECTING AT A DISTANCE THE STATUS AND IDENTITY OF OBJECTS | ||
Patent #
US 3,665,449 A
Filed 07/11/1969
|
Current Assignee
3M Company
|
Sponsoring Entity
3M Company
|
14 Claims
- 1. An article removal control system for enabling removal of a given article only by a given authorized user from a facility which has:
(a) an article inventory control system which responds to inputs including user identification data and article identification data to issue an article removal authorization signal, and (b) an electronic article surveillance system which controls removal of the article by detecting within an interrogation zone a sensitized electronically detectable marker secured to the article; the article removal control system comprising; (c) an article removal authorization signal receiver and (d) means responsive to the article removal authorization signal for initiating removal of the given article, comprising (1) a measurer of a characteristic of the given article, (2) a receiver of a coded input signal representing the measured characteristic, (3) a comparer of the measured characteristic and the coded input signal, which produces a verification signal if they are substantially equal, and (4) an enabler which upon receipt of the verification signal enables the initiation of the removal of the given article. - View Dependent Claims (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14)
1 Specification
This invention relates to a system for controlling removal of a specifically identified article from a facility by a specifically authorized user.
Article inventory control (AIC) systems, in general, authorize, track, and control movement of a given article within a facility by a given user. An example is a library circulation control system. In this case, a user could identify himself or herself with an identification card containing magnetically or optically detectable data (e.g., a barcode). The articles, books in the collection of the library, typically would have a similar identifying label. Usually a computerized user database contains identification data on all registered patrons of the library, and a similar article database contains identification data on all books in the library. When someone desires to remove a book from the library, the library circulation control system will first verify that the person is an authorized patron of the library, i.e., that the person is authorized to check out any book, or any of a particular class of books. The system will then verify that the particular book may be removed from the library, e.g., that it is not "on reserve." If both the user and the book are authorized by the system, the book may be removed, ("checked out") by that user. This authorization is often a visual or audible signal to library personnel. Additionally, but not required, the system could maintain data which correlates the specific user with the specific books checked out, and may issue fine notices, usage reports, and the like.
To prevent unauthorized removal of articles by users of facilities, electronic article surveillance (EAS) systems may also be employed. An electronic article surveillance system is defined as a system which comprises:
(1) a remotely interrogatable marker attached to a given article;
(2) means for interrogating and sensing the marker within an interrogation zone, thereby determining presence of the article; and
(3) means for preventing removal of the article by a user of the facility.
For the purposes of this invention, the term "removal" is understood to include the ability of the user to gain access to an article, to move an article from one point to another within a facility, to bring an article into a facility, or to remove an article from a facility. The last of these is a common use of EAS systems. However, an EAS system as defined above can control, for example, the routing of articles from one portion of a factory assembly line to another.
Many EAS systems employ a magnetic "marker" attached to an article, with appropriate marker interrogation and sensing apparatus located at one or more locations in the facility. Typically, removal of an article is prevented by restricting movement of the article within or from the facility, as with a lockable exit gate. The gate is locked in response to an alarm signal when a marker is detected within an interrogation zone located immediately before the exit. In the library example used above, the marker may comprise a piece of magnetic material adapted to be inserted in the book spine or attached inside the book cover.
Typically, EAS systems employ permanently or reversibly deactivatable markers and the apparatus associated with them. Such markers are also known as "dual status" markers. Permanently deactivatable markers are preferred where it is appropriate in certain circumstances for an article to pass through the interrogation zone without preventing removal. For example, in a retail store, if an article of merchandise has been purchased in a particular department, the marker may be deactivated at that point so that an interrogation zone in another department will not activate the marker. Reactivatable markers are appropriate, for example, in libraries where patrons who check out a book for an extended period of time may subsequently visit the library with that book during that period. In this case, the system should not prevent subsequent removal of the book until the book has been returned, the marker reactivated, and the book returned to circulation.
Integration of the functions of the two systems described above into a single system is known in the art. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,665,449 (Elder et al.) at column 15, lines 62-67 generally suggests that automated library checkout systems may be combined with EAS systems. More specifically related to the present invention, U.S. Pat. No. 4,141,078 (Bridges, Jr. et al.) discloses an automated library circulation control system which provides for patron identification via a card reader, book identification via an optical reader, modification and interrogation of computer data files, an electromagnetic device for magnetizing and demagnetizing a magnetic strip in each book, detection of unauthorized removal of books from the library, and other functions. The disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 4,141,078 (Bridges, Jr. et al.) is incorporated by reference into this application.
Application of this type of integrated system may be difficult, especially in libraries in which one or both of the individual systems are in current operation. For example, some existing EAS systems cannot distinguish individual markers, only whether a sensitized marker is present. Thus a single library might employ markers which are identical, even on different types of books in the collection. The marker therefore may not already contain coded inventory data which could identify the type of article to which it is attached. A library with such an EAS system in place, but no computerized inventory control system, would have to add a unique inventory control marker to each book. Each book generally must be uniquely identified, including the identification of multiple copies of a single title, some of which may be in general circulation while one is on reserve.
Furthermore, present EAS systems generally are not designed to receive removal authorization signals from AIC systems added later. Thus, for complete article removal control in such a facility, it is necessary to have separate article inventory control and article surveillance systems, and usually a manual, labor intensive, connection between the two. In a library, such a connection might be a circulation clerk who, seeing a flashing light on the AIC system indicating book removal authorization, physically passes a book through a marker deactivation device of the EAS system. Another possibility is for the circulation clerk to manually bypass the removal prevention means, e.g., physically passing the book around the interrogation device and handing the book to the patron on the other side of the lockable gate. Since the patron would pass through the interrogation zone without any marked books, the gate would remain unlocked and thus allow the patron to exit the library.
The invention is an article removal control system for enabling removal of a given article only by a given authorized user from a facility which has:
(a) an article inventory control system which responds to inputs including user identification data and article identification data to issue an article removal authorization signal, and
(b) an electronic article surveillance system which controls removal of the article by detecting within an interrogation zone a sensitized electronically detectable marker secured to the article;
the article removal control system comprising:
(c) an article removal authorization signal receiver and
(d) means responsive to the article removal authorization signal for initiating removal of the given article, comprising
(1) a measurer of a characteristic of the given article,
(2) a receiver of a coded input signal representing the measured characteristic,
(3) a comparer of the measured characteristic and the coded input signal, which produces a verification signal if they are substantially equal, and
(4) an enabler which upon receipt of the verification signal enables the initiation of the removal of the given article.
FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a preferred embodiment of the invention and associated components.
FIGS. 2 and 3 are detailed schematic block diagrams of components of FIG. 1.
FIG. 4 is a detailed schematic block diagram of the terminal component of FIG. 1.
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a preferred embodiment of the terminal component of FIG. 4.
FIG. 6 is a side cut-away view of a preferred embodiment of the transmitter component of FIG. 1.
FIG. 7 is a side cut-away view of a preferred embodiment of the receiver component of FIG. 1.
FIGS. 1-4 are schematic diagrams in which major components of a preferred embodiment of the invention are located within a portion of a facility generally indicated as 100. Within the facility is at least one article 110, attached to which are an article identification code 220, an electronic article surveillance (EAS) marker 310, and an article characteristic code 460. The codes 220 and 460 could be parts of a single label, similar to a Universal Product Code (UPC) label.
The article inventory control (AIC) system 200 and electronic article surveillance (EAS) system 300 may exist within the facility prior to the installation of the inventive system, or may be installed at or about the same time.
The AIC system 200 includes a user identification card 210. In general, this system identifies a user (not shown) through the user identification card 210, and similarly identifies the article 110 through the article identification code 220. The article identification code could be permanently affixed to the article itself, embedded or inscribed on the article, or affixed to a tag adapted to be attached to the article. The AIC system determines if the identified user is allowed to remove the identified article from the facility. If so, the AIC sends an article removal authorization signal 270 to the terminal 400. If not, removal of the article is prevented as described below. Other functions of the AIC system not required here, such as storage of the time and date of use, etc., may also be performed before the article removal authorization signal 270 is sent to the terminal.
The EAS system 300 interrogates the EAS marker 310 with interrogation signal 322, receives a sensed signal 324, and, upon receipt of a verified article removal authorization signal 710, allows the user to remove the article from the facility.
The inventive system comprises, in this preferred embodiment, at least one terminal 400. In general, the terminal 400 converts user and article identification data 412 and 422, respectively, into transmitted user and article identification signals 232 and 242, respectively, which are passed to the AIC system 200 for the identification of the user and article as described above.
Other inputs to the terminal 400 are an article characteristic measurement 432 and a coded article characteristic measurement 442. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, the source of the coded article characteristic measurement is the article characteristic code 460 attached to the article 110. The coded article characteristic measurement 442 is entered at the terminal by the user 120. This embodiment is preferred but not required; the coded article characteristic measurement 442 could be introduced to the terminal automatically in a manner similar to that used for the user or article identification data 412 or 422, respectively. The embodiment shown requires interaction between a user and the terminal 400, which can be used to improve the security of the total system.
The terminal compares the article characteristic measurement 432 with the coded article characteristic measurement 442. If the two agree (within suitable tolerances), it is presumably verified that the entire article 110, and only that article, is physically present at the terminal, and not just the article identification code 220 (which might have been removed from the article, if possible), or more than one article (which would produce a different article characteristic measurement 432). When both this agreement and the article removal authorization signal 270 are present, the terminal issues the verified article removal authorization signal 710 to the EAS system 300.
In this way, communication between the separate systems 200 and 300 is established. The result is that the EAS system permits a given article to be removed from the facility only by a given authorized user, as determined by the AIC system.
Signals 232, 242, and 270, however, present special difficulties. As stated earlier, many present AIC systems are not adapted to communicate with other systems to provide the benefits of this invention, especially if the AIC system is not designed and/or installed contemporaneously with an EAS system. As disclosed below, this invention utilizes existing AIC signals in the integration of AIC and EAS functions without requiring significant modifications to the AIC system or "hardwired" connections between the two systems. In order to disclose this, additional description of the AIC and EAS systems is useful.
FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of a typical prior art article inventory control system 200. As stated above, inputs to this system are the transmitted user identification signal 232, and the transmitted article identification signal 242. The output from the system is the article removal authorization signal 270. The transmitted user identification signal 232 is evaluated by a user identifier 230 (e.g., a database is searched), and a determination is made whether the user is known to the system. If so, a verified user identification signal 234 is issued to an article removal authorizer 250. Similarly, the transmitted article identification signal 242 is evaluated by an article identifier 240 (e.g., another database is searched), and a determination is made whether the article is known to the system. If so, an article identification signal 244 is issued to the article removal authorizer 250. The article removal authorizer 250 uses both verified identification signals 234 and 244 to decide if the user is authorized to remove the article from the facility. (Additional considerations, not shown, may include the time of day, number of previous removal requests by a given user in a day, and the like.) If so, an article removal authorization signal 270 is produced. If any of the evaluations, determinations, etc., above indicate an unauthorized user and/or unauthorized article, the article removal authorization signal 270 is not produced.
FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram of a typical electronic article surveillance system 300, including modifications according to this invention. As stated above, this system sends the interrogation signal 322 to the EAS marker 310 and receives the sensed signal 324 from the EAS marker 310. It also receives the verified article removal authorization signal 710 from the terminal 400. Typically, the interrogation signal 322 results in an alternating magnetic field of known intensity and frequency in an interrogation zone. The sense signal 324 is induced as a result of the alternating magnetization in the marker in response to the interrogation signal 322, and comprises multiple harmonics of the interrogation signal. When an activated EAS marker 310 is interrogated and sensed by an interrogator/sensor 320, an activation status signal 330 is created. This signal is used by removal preventer 350 to decide if the article to which the activated marker is attached may be removed from the facility.
The embodiment shown in FIG. 3 is suitable for use with permanently deactivatable markers. Accordingly, the EAS system 300 further comprises deactivator 340, which receives the verified article removal authorization signal 710 The total system operates as described above, and additionally the receipt of signal 710 energizes the deactivator, which in turn emits deactivation signal 34 to the marker 310. Typically, deactivation signal 342 is a high intensity non-alternating magnetic field. Once marker 310 is permanently deactivated, sensed signal 324 will not be produced upon subsequent interrogation, and thus the activation status signal 330 will be the same as if no marker was sensed at all. Therefore, the removal preventer 350 will not prevent the user to remove the article.
An embodiment similar to the above is suitable for EAS systems employing reactivatable markers. In this case, there will be at least two signals received by the EAS system from the terminal. One signal would be the verified article removal authorization signal 710, which would be used, for example, to allow a library user to remove a book from the library upon "check out." Upon receipt of this signal, the system would operate as described above, except the marker will be only temporarily deactivated. A second signal (not shown) would energize a reactivator, which would emit a suitable signal to restore a temporarily deactivated marker to active status. This would be used, for example, to allow a library user to return a book to the library upon "check in."
Regardless of the type of marker chosen, removal of articles by users determined to be authorized by the article inventory control system is accomplished by requiring an appropriate activation status signal 330 as described above.
FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram of the terminal 400. The terminal receives the user identification data 412, the article identification data 422, the article characteristic measurement 432, the coded article characteristic measurement 442, and the article removal authorization signal 270. The terminal sends the user identification signal 232, the article identification signal 242, and the verified article removal authorization signal 710. A user of the facility who desires to remove an article from the facility enters his or her user identification data into the terminal, e.g., by typing an identification number on an alphanumeric keypad. Similarly, the article identification data is entered into the terminal, e.g., by using an optical scanner to read a barcode on the article. A user identification receiver 410 receives the user identification data 412 and sends an internal user identification signal 414 to the user identification transmitter 510. Similarly, an article identification receiver 420 receives the article identification data 422 and sends an internal article identification signal 424 to the article identification transmitter 520. Either or both of these processes could involve a translation of the input signals 412 and 422 into a different encoding format, such as from ASCII to BCD.
The user identification transmitter 510 receives the internal user identification signal 414 and sends the transmitted user identification signal 232 to the user identifier 230 of the AIC system 200, described above (FIG. 2). Similarly, the article identification transmitter 520 receives the internal article identification signal 424 and sends the transmitted article identification signal 242 to the article identifier 240. Either or both of these processes could involve a translation of the internal signals 414 and 424 into a different encoding format, such as ASCII to BCD. It is mandatory that the user and article identification signals 232 and 242 be compatible in coding (e.g., ASCII) and form (e.g., audible tone, varying voltage level, etc.) to the signals which the AIC system is designed to accept.
The article characteristic measurement is made by an article characteristic measurer 430, which also produces a measured article characteristic signal 434. The coded article characteristic receiver 440 receives the coded article characteristic measurement 442 representing the same characteristic, but the latter is coded in a form that is not necessarily understandable to the user. For example, with a keypad as described above, the user may enter an alphanumeric or other code printed on a label attached to the article. Alternatively, if the code is in the form of a barcode, or the like, it may also be automatically entered. The code gives the value of the characteristic as measured before the article was made available for removal from the facility. In response, the terminal produces a coded article characteristic signal 444, and the measured characteristic verifier 450 compares the measured and coded signals 434 and 444 to verify that only the actual article, and not just a tag containing the article identification code 220 for example, is in fact present at the terminal. This comparison produces a characteristic verification signal 452, which is one input to an article removal enabler 700. The use of a verified measured characteristic of the article is preferred for its accuracy over non-measurement based systems such as that taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,141,078 (Bridges, et al.), e.g., at column 6, lines 6-14.
The other input to the article removal enabler 700 is an internal article removal authorization signal 614. This signal is produced by an article removal authorization receiver 610, which receives the article removal authorization signal 270 from the article removal authorizer 250 of the AIC system 200, as described above. As with the user and article identification transmitters 510 and 520, the article removal authorization receiver 610 could translate the article removal authorization signal 270 into a different encoding format, such as from ASCII to BCD. It is likewise mandatory that the article removal authorization receiver 610 be capable of receiving and understanding the article removal authorization signal 270 which the AIC system is designed to emit, including coding (e.g., ASCII) and form (flashing light, RS-232C, 20 mA current loop, etc.).
The article removal enabler 700 performs a logical "and" function, requiring both signals 452 and 614 to be present before issuing the article removal authorization authorization signal 710 to deactivator 340 of the EAS system 300. Thus, the issuance of the signal 710 identifies to the EAS system that (1) the user is authorized to remove the article according to the article removal authorization signal 270, and (2) the article is in fact present at the terminal according to the measured characteristic verification signal 452.
In certain applications, it may be convenient to remove the user identification transmitter 510 and/or the article identification transmitter 520 from the terminal 400 and physically locate either or both near the AIC system 200. Similarly, the article authorization receiver 610 may be removed from the terminal 400 and located near the EAS system. However, it is preferred to incorporate or duplicate the deactivation and/or reactivation functions directly into the terminal 400. In this case, the article authorization receiver 610 is not removed from the terminal 400, and article removal authorization signal 710 is wholly internal to the terminal 400. However, the removal preventer 350 would still stand alone and include a duplicate interrogator/sensor 320 operating as described above.
FIG. 5 shows a preferred embodiment of the terminal suitable for use in a library. The embodiment of FIG. 5 includes the preferred configuration discussed above, in which certain interrogation, sensing, and deactivation functions of the EAS system are additionally incorporated into the terminal. In this embodiment, the article 110 is a book, map, or other member of the collection of the library; a user of the facility is typically referred to as a "patron" of the library; and the EAS system 300 typically includes as the removal preventer 350 a gate which is normally locked. Typically, the patron, carrying the book, passes through an interrogation zone immediately before exiting from the library or an individual department of the library; if the electronic article surveillance system interrogates and senses an activated marker attached to the book (i.e., the marker was not temporarily deactivated as part of the book check out procedure), the gate is held shut, thereby preventing egress, and perhaps also activating a visible or audible alarm.
In the embodiment of FIG. 5, the terminal 800 receives the user identification signal 412 by means of an optical sensor 802. The patron places an identification card flat on the book shelf 804 and against the front face of card rail 803, which holds the card in the proper orientation. The identification card, in this embodiment, has user identification data encoded on it in the form of a barcode or other means which can be optically detected. Optical sensor 801 detects the presence of the card and enables optical sensor 802. The use of two optical sensors is not required, but is preferred to ensure that ambient light does not trigger optical sensor 802 when an identification card is not present. Such triggering can cause spurious signals which may be improperly interpreted by the terminal or the AIC system. As the card is passed by the patron from right to left, the barcode on the identification card is read, and the user identification data 412 received.
The optical sensors could be replaced by devices known in the art for receiving and decoding magnetically encoded data on the identification card. A similar process of reading the encoded data would be use, such as passing the card over a "card reader" sensor built into the shelf of the terminal.
The article identification data 422 is also received by the terminal. The book is placed flat on book shelf 804 and firmly against the back rail 805. Card rail 803 is movable and spring loaded so that the book lowers it temporarily below shelf 804. The book is passed from right to left over the optical sensors 801 and 802 until it lies in the corner formed by the book shelf 804, the back rail 805, and the side rail 806, thereby covering optical sensor 807. This embodiment requires that the article identification code 220 be attached to the book in a position which will enable the barcode on the marker to be read by optical sensor 802 when the book is held flat on the book shelf 804.
If the optical sensors are replaced by devices known in the art for receiving and decoding magnetically encoded data on the identification card, as described above, and it is desired to use the same device for receiving the article identification data 422 as the user identification data 412, the article identification code 220 also must be magnetically encoded. However, it is not necessary that the user and article identification receivers 410 and 420 be identical.
When the book is passed completely from right to left, it covers optical sensor 807, which activates the characteristic measuring component 808. The terminal monitors optical sensor 807 and aborts the checkout process if the book is removed. In this position, the book is suitably positioned to allow the terminal to measure a characteristic of the book. In the preferred embodiment shown, the characteristic measured is the thickness of the book along the dimension perpendicular to the book shelf. The preferred means for measuring thickness is an ultrasonic ranging measurement of the distance from the characteristic measuring component 808 and the book. A preferred means for ultrasonic ranging is available from the Polaroid Company and is identified as "OEM Ranging Kit" with product code IP44491. Following the directions provided with this product, the ultrasonic ranging means is adjusted to measure within ±1.6 millimeters over a range of 11.5 to 25 centimeters.
Subtraction of the distance between the characteristic measuring component 808 and the book, from the known distance between the same point and the book shelf 804, yields the thickness of the book. In the preferred embodiment, this thickness, pre-measured before the book was placed in circulation, is coded into a hexadecimal value and attached to the book so that the user may read it as article characteristic code 460. The user enters the hexadecimal code by means of the user declaration keypad 809. This embodiment is preferred as it requires interaction between the patron and the system, which is believed to increase the security of the entire system. The terminal thus receives measured and entered values of the same characteristic.
The terminal then compares the measured and entered values of the characteristic, and if the two agree (within acceptable tolerances), the terminal concludes that only the specifically identified book is present at the terminal, and issues characteristic verification signal 452. If only the barcode were passed across the optical sensor 802, or if more than one book were stacked beneath the characteristic measuring component 808, the measured thickness of the book would not agree with the coded measurement entered by the user.
Another suitable characteristic is the weight of the article. In this embodiment, the terminal would incorporate a scale to produce the measured characteristic, and compare this value to a pre-coded, user-entered weight measurement as described above.
The preferred embodiment of the terminal shown in FIG. 5 utilizes user and article identification transmitters 510 and 520 which are physically separated from the terminal, and also a physically separated article removal authorization receiver 610, as described above. Thus, the terminal passes the user identification signal 414 and the article identification signal 424 to the transmitters 510 and 520 using any means known in the art, typically common wire. As described above, if the article inventory control system authorizes the removal of the book from the library, the terminal receives the authorization signal 614 from the receiver 610. This too may be received through any means known in the art.
FIG. 6 is a side cut-away view of a preferred embodiment of an optical transmitter 500, which incorporates the functions of both the user and article identification transmitters 510 and 520. This embodiment is suitable for AIC systems which employ a barcode reader 530 as an element of both the user identifier 230 and the article identifier 240. The optical transmitter is connected with the terminal 800 by a common cable 540 which carries user identification signal 414 and article identification signal 424 through any convenient signal transmission means. Cable 540 terminates on circuit board 541, which includes light emitting diode (LED) 542. Cover 501 is preferably designed to hold barcode wand 530 in close proximity to LED 542.
The circuit of circuit board 541 is designed to replicate, by flashing LED 542, the barcode signal detected by optical sensor 802. Thus, the barcode wand 530 receives the same user and article identification data 412 and 422, in the same form, as if the barcode wand 530 had been physically present in the terminal 800 at the location of optical sensor 802. A preferred circuit is described in Application Note 1008 (published by the Hewlett-Packard Company in January 1981), modified to operate on a 5 vdc power supply and use a LED as the output device instead of a direct wired connection to a barcode circuit. This circuit is effective for use with the barcode wand 530 of a model 9410B Portable Bar Code Reader supplied by the Interface Mechanisms Company. The optical sensor 802 is preferably a model HBCS-1100, and the LED 542 is preferably a model HEMT-6000, both supplied by the Hewlett-Packard Company. Other models of barcode reader may require other similar circuits and/or modifications.
FIG. 7 is a side cut-away view of a preferred embodiment of an audio receiver 600, which incorporates the functions of the article authorization receiver 610. This embodiment is suitable for AIC systems which employ an audio generator (not shown) as an element of the authorization signal producer 260. Such a generator would typically produce an audible tone in which is encoded in some manner the article removal authorization signal 270. The encoding method could involve one or more frequencies, or the duration of the audio signal, or some combination. FIG. 7 also shows cable 640, which carries received removal authorization signal 270 through any convenient signal transmission means. The cable 640 terminates on circuit board 641, and connects the audio receiver with the terminal 800.
The circuit of circuit board 641 preferably is designed to produce a voltage pulse whenever an audible signal is detected by microphone 642. Thus, if the terminal is adapted to receive this voltage pulse, it operates as if the authorization signal producer 260, which produced the audible tone, is directly connected to it. A preferred design incorporates a frequency-sensitive circuit, known in the art as a "bi-quad" RC active bandpass filter, tuned to the specific audible signal produced by authorization signal producer 260. Typically, this audible signal is between 0.9 and 4.0 kHz. A preferred microphone is model MC1606 supplied by the Armaco Company. It is useful to use a parabolic reflector in conjunction with the microphone to focus the microphone in the direction of the audible signal source of the AIC system. Other frequency sensitive circuits and components may be suitable for other audible signals.
While certain representative embodiments and details have been shown to illustrate this invention, it will be apparent to those skilled in this art that various changes and modifications may be made in this invention without departing from its true spirit or scope, which is indicated by the following claims.