Automatic stepper for resistance welding

• US 4,885,451 A
• Filed: 05/09/1988
• Issued: 12/05/1989
• Est. Priority Date: 05/09/1988
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Medar Incorporated (Nadex (Thailand) Co. Ltd.)
• Original Assignee: Medar Incorporated (Nadex (Thailand) Co. Ltd.)
• Inventors: Schulz, David W., Farrow, John F.
• Primary Examiner(s): Shaw, Clifford C.
• Application Number:
  US07/192,001
• Time in Patent Office: 575 Days
• Field of Search: 219/110, 219/117.1, 219/114
• US Class Current: 219/110
• CPC Class Codes: B23K 11/252 using digital means

Abstract

A method is disclosed for controlling the magnitude of current delivered through welding electrodes to a workpiece to be welded using resistance welding techniques, in order to prevent weld expulsion and concomitant diminishment of weld quality. Weld expulsion is detected by determining changes in resistance during formation of the weld, by periodically determining the power factor, and the primary circuit of the welding transformer. The power factor is determined by determining the relative timing between the commencement of the applied voltage, the zero crossover point of the applied voltage, and the ensuing zero point of the applied current.

Claims

1. For use in a resistance welding process in which an alternating electrical current is delivered to a metal workpiece through a circuit including electrodes to produce a weld caused by localized melting of the workpiece, wherein the application of an excessive amount of said current results in expulsion of molten metal from said weld thereby diminishing the quality of said weld, a method of controlling the magnitude of current delivered to said workpiece through said electrodes, comprising the steps of:

(A) determining the time interval t₁ between the application of voltage to said electrodes and the following zero crossover of said voltage;

(B) determining the time interval t₂ between said zero crossover point of said voltage and the following zero point of the current resulting from said application of voltage;

(C) determining the value of the power factor of said circuit using the time intervals t₁, t₂ determined in steps (A) and (B), the expulsion of molten metal from said weld being a function of the value of the power factor determined in step (B); and

(D) changing the magnitude of said current based at least in part on the value of the power factor determined in step (C).

2. The method of claim 1, including the step of determining the change in electrical resistance of said weld using the value of said power factor determined in step (C), said change in resistance being related to the magnitude of expulsion of molten metal from said weld.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein steps (A)-(C) are performed repeatedly respectively on successive welds and step (D) is performed only when the value of the power factor determined in step (C) for each of a plurality of welds is in a preselected relationship to a reference value corresponding to a weld in which at least some degree of expulsion of molten metal occurs.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein step (D) is performed by decreasing the magnitude of said current when the value of the power factor determined in step (C) for each of a preselected number of welds indicates the occurrence of expulsion of molten material in said latter-mentioned welds.

5. The method of claim 3, wherein step (D) is performed by increasing the magnitude of said current when the value of the power factor determined in step (C) for each of a preselected number of welds indicates that expulsion of molten material has not occurred in any of said latter-mentioned welds.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the performance of step (C) is delayed a preselected period of time after commencement of the flow of electrical current through said electrodes to said weld.

7. The method of claim 1, including the step of choosing a blanking interval during which no changes in said magnitude of said current can be made, step (D) being commenced only after completing step (E).

8. The method of claim 1, wherein steps (A)-(C) are repeatedly performed respectively for a plurality of successive welds, with the quality of said welds being related to the respective power factors determined in step (C) for each weld, and said method further includes the steps of:

(E) classifying the welds into acceptable welds and unacceptable welds based on the respective power factors determined in step (C); and

(F) accumulating first and second counts respectively of said acceptable and unacceptable welds wherein at least some expulsion of molten material has occurred in said unacceptable welds and essentially no expulsion of molten material has occurred in said acceptable welds.

9. The method of claim 8, including the steps of:

(G) comparing said first and second counts respectively with first and second reference values; and

(H) changing the magnitude of said current based on the comparison performed in step (G).

10. The method of claim 8, including the steps of:

(G) comparing said first and second counts respectively with first and second reference values;

(H) when said first count is equal to or exceeds said first reference value, increasing said current and resetting said second count; and

(I) when said second count is equal to or exceeds said second reference value, decreasing said current and resetting said first and second counts.

11. For use with resistance welding apparatus of the type having a transformer including a primary circuit, said primary circuit including a source of alternating electrical current and switching means for selectively switching said alternating electrical current to the primary of said transformer, said transformer having a secondary circuit including a pair of electrodes for applying electrical current to a workpiece to be welded, wherein the application of an excessive level of current to said workpiece results in expulsion of molten material from said weld thereby diminishing the quality of said weld, a method of controlling the level of current applied to said weld, comprising the steps of:

(A) determining the point in time when said switching means is switched to apply voltage from said current source to said transformer primary, said current commencing to flow in said primary and secondary circuits upon said application of voltage to said transformer primary;

(B) determining the time intervals t₁, t₂ between the point in time determined in step (A) and the subsequent respective zero points of the alternating voltage and current applied to said transformer primary;

(C) determining the change in impedance in said primary circuit based on the time intervals t₁, t₂ determined in step (B), said change in impedance being related to changes in the resistance in said primary circuit caused by the formation of said weld; and

(D) changing the magnitude of said current based at least in part on the change in impedance determined in step (C).

12. The method of claim 11, wherein steps (A)-(C) are performed repeatedly respectively on successive welds and step (D) is performed only after the value of the impedance determined in step (C) is determined to be in a preselected relationship to a reference value with respect to at least one of said welds in which at least some degree of expulsion of molten metal occurs in said one weld.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein the performance of step (C) is delayed a preselected period of time after commencement of the flow of electrical current in said secondary circuit.

14. The method of claim 11, including the step of selecting a blanking interval during which no changes in said magnitude of current can be made based on the impedance determined in step (C).

15. The method of claim 11, wherein steps (A)-(C) are repeatedly performed respectively for a plurality of successive welds, with the quality of said welds being related to the respective changes in impedances determined in step (C) for each weld, and said method further includes the steps of:

(E) classifying the welds into acceptable and unacceptable welds based on the change in impedance determined in step (C); and

(F) accumulating first and second counts respectively of said acceptable and unacceptable welds, wherein at least some expulsion of molten material has occurred in said unacceptable welds and essentially no expulsion of molten material has occurred in said acceptable welds.

16. The method of claim 15, including the steps of:

(G) comparing said first and second counts respectively with first and second reference values; and

,

(H) changing the magnitude of said current based on the comparison performed in step (G).

17. The method of claim 15, including the steps of:

(G) comparing said first and second counts respectively with first and second reference values;

(H) when said first count is equal to or greater than said first reference value, increasing said current and resetting said second count; and

(I) when said second count is equal to or greater than said second reference value, decreasing said current and resetting said first and second counts.