Computer aided flood control modeling and management system

• US 4,885,706 A
• Filed: 02/03/1988
• Issued: 12/05/1989
• Est. Priority Date: 02/03/1988
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: PATE Systems Incorporated
• Original Assignee: PATE Systems Incorporated
• Inventors: Sutton, Alexander G., Ross, Jeff E., Mullinax, Ronald L., Pate, Gerry E.
• Primary Examiner(s): Gruber, Felix D.
• Application Number:
  US07/151,891
• Time in Patent Office: 671 Days
• Field of Search: 364/200, 364/578, 364/900, 364/551.01
• US Class Current: 703/10
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: Y02A 10/40 Controlling or monitoring, e.g. of flood or hurricane; Forecasting, e.g. risk assessment or mapping

Abstract

The present invention is used in the management of flood control systems. A database representing a plurality of watersheds and associated control systems, including monitoring and control systems, is used to simulate the effect of existing and proposed developments on the selected watershed. The effects of these analyses may be displayed either as text or graphically. By using a single database, the system may be used to manage the cumulative effect of multiple analyses and maintain the currency of proposed developments. The system includes a design module which permits the operator to interactively modify watershed parameters used in the analysis, thereby modeling proposed changes in the flood control system.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the effect of proposed developments or system modifications upon a flood control system, the steps of which comprise:

(a) establishing a system watershed data base including data representing a plurality of watersheds and associated parameters, said parameters including data relating to hydrological and hydraulic characteristics of primary and secondary water channels, location and surface acreage of existing developments, expected rainfall levels, and terrain data associated with said watersheds;

(b) identifying the watershed within which the proposed development or system modification is located;

(c) developing data representative of the boundaries of the proposed development or modification;

(d) calculating the hydrological parameters associated with the proposed land development or system modification within the selected watershed;

(e) reviewing a data file including data representative of the status of previously approved developments or modifications within the selected watershed to determine whether such previously approved developments or modifications are current;

(f) determining the hydrological parameters associated with the portion of the flood control system comprising the existing, currently approved and proposed land developments or modifications within the selected watershed;

(g) modifying the watershed data base to include data representative of the hydrological parameters of the proposed and previously approved and current new developments;

(h) determining modified hydrological flow rates for main and secondary channels within the selected watershed utilizing the modified watershed data base;

(i) determining modified flows for a plurality of stations or locations located along the main water channels within the selected watershed;

(j) establishing a modified hydraulic analysis input data base including data representative of the hydrological and hydraulic parameters of the portion of the flood control system comprising the existing watershed, the approved developments and the proposed development or modifications;

(k) determining the effects of the proposed development or modification upon the selected watershed and associated flood control system utilizing the data within the modified hydraulic analysis input data file, including a determination of the water surface profile for stations or locations along the primary water channel within the selected watershed;

(l) comparing the effects of the proposed development or modification with prescribed minimum or maximum parameters to determine if the effects of the proposed development or modification cause the watershed parameters to satisfy the prescribed minimums or maximums.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of providing a graphic display of the effects of the proposed new development or modification on flood levels.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the display includes an indication of which, if any, of the resulting effects fail to satisfy the prescribed minimums or maximums.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of selectively updating the selected watershed parameters to include those parameters attributable to the proposed development, where the proposed development satisfies regulatory agency requirements.

5. The method of claim 1, further including steps to evaluate the effects of said newly proposed land development upon said secondary water channels located within said selected watershed, said additional steps comprising:

(a) selecting the secondary water channels within the watershed to be analyzed;

(b) revising the modified hydrological analysis output data file to include parameters associated with the selected secondary water channels;

(c) determining flows for a plurality of stations or locations along the selected secondary water channels within the selected watershed, and modifying the station discharge file;

(d) modifying the hydraulic analysis input data file to reflect information within said updated hydrological output data file and said updated station discharge flow file;

(e) modifying the effects upon the selected watershed based upon information within the modified hydraulic analysis input data file, thereby calculating a water surface profile for points along the selected secondary water channels within the selected watershed; and

(f) comparing the effects of the proposed development with predetermined regulatory agency acceptable water surface profile data, thereby determining if the selected secondary water channels'"'"' water surface profile exceeds levels set by the regulatory agency for a plurality of corresponding stations or locations along the selected secondary water channels.

6. The method of claim 5, further comprising the step of selectively updating the selected secondary water channel parameters within the selected watershed to include parameters attributable to the proposed development, where the proposed development satisfies regulatory agency requirements.

7. The method of claim 1, further including the additional steps of:

(a) selectively, interactively modifying data within any of the input, output, work or data files and databases used or created in the analysis process;

(b) using interactively modified files and databases for further use in the analysis process; and

(c) maintaining a copy of said input, output, work or data files and databases which do not reflect said interactive modifications.

8. The method of analysis of claim 3, further including executing discrete steps of the method on an iterative basis to model the effect of alternative scenarios in the analysis process prior to proceeding to the next step in the analysis.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of describing the boundaries of the proposed development includes graphically identifying the boundaries.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of describing the boundaries of proposed development includes reading a boundary file containing records describing the boundaries.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of reviewing and aging previously approved developments includes:

(a) serially reading a record from an approved development commitment file, the record including watershed parameters associated with the approved development, including the date on which the record was added to the commitment file;

(b) determining if the record status indicates that the development commitment is in compliance with said regulatory agency requirements for maintaining the development and its associated record in the proposed commitment file;

(c) updating the record status to indicate that said development is in compliance where regulatory agency requirements have been met;

(d) where said record status indicates the development is not in compliance, comparing the elapsed time since development was added to development commitment file to an elapsed time period set by said regulatory agency;

(e) where record status indicates that the development is not in compliance, generating a printed message for administrative purposes indicating the development is non-current, having approached or exceeded the time period set for complying with the regulatory agency requirements;

(f) deleting the non-current records from the development commitment file, thereby permitting the method to continue; and

(g) repeating said steps (a) through (e) until all records within the development commitment file have been reviewed;

(h) halting execution of the method where any of the records within the development commitment file indicate that a record and its associated development are non-current;

(i) writing the exception file to printed media for administrative purposes.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of modifying the watershed data base to include hydrological parameters of the proposed and previously approved developments further comprises the steps of:

(a) determining if secondary water channels are to be included in the analysis;

(b) reading a data file representing parameters associated with the proposed development and verifying that the proposed development exists within the selected watershed;

(c) serially reading records in a development commitment file, including associated acreage parameters, accumulating the acreage parameters associated with the proposed development and a preexisting base acreage file, representative of existing developments and terrain data within the watershed and writing the records to a work file;

(d) where secondary water channels have been selected to be included in the analysis, serially reading a record in a secondary water channel data file, including associated acreage parameters, accumulating to the total already calculated in said step (c) and writing the records to the work file, repeating steps (c) and (d) until all records in the development commitment and selected secondary water channel data files have been read, accumulated and written to the work file;

(e) printing the results of contents of said work file to indicate the total acreage designated to be included in the analysis;

(f) serially reading a record in the work file, calculating hydrological runoff parameters for the specific acreage represented by the record and writing the results of the calculations back to the record, repeating said step until runoff parameters for all records in the work file have been calculated; and

(g) serially reading a preexisting hydrological analysis input data file, determining corresponding records in the generic file and the work file and modifying the generic hydrological analysis input data file to include calculated hydrological runoff parameters from the work file, thereby creating the modified hydrological analysis input data file.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of calculating station discharge flow further comprises the steps of:

(a) serially reading a record in a primary watershed channel data file;

(b) serially reading records from the hydrological analysis output data file, selecting those records associated with hydrological stations or locations along the primary and secondary water channels and writing the selected records to a station peak flow file;

(c) serially reading records in a preexisting hydraulic analysis base file and corresponding records in the station peak flow file, interpolating hydraulic analysis flows, and calculating the total discharge flows for said stations or locations; and

(d) writing results of the calculations to a station discharge file.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of modifying a preexisting hydraulic analysis input data comprises the steps of:

(a) serially reading a record in a station discharge file, including information concerning both hydrological output flows and interpolated hydraulic analysis flows for the primary and secondary channels affected;

(b) serially reading a record in a preexisting hydraulic analysis input data file and modifying corresponding records in the preexisting file to include calculated flow data from the station discharge file.

15. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of comparing the hydraulic analysis effects with minimum or maximum parameters further comprises the steps of:

(a) serially reading a record in the hydraulic analysis output file;

(b) calculating a water surface profile for various stations or locations along the selected primary and secondary water channels;

(c) comparing the water surface profile record to a corresponding record in a preexisting regulatory agency water surface profile file; and

(d) writing the results of the comparison to a comparison output file, including information identifying the location or point in the analysis.