Apparatus for self checking of functional redundancy check (FRC) logic

• US 4,903,270 A
• Filed: 06/14/1988
• Issued: 02/20/1990
• Est. Priority Date: 06/14/1988
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Intel Corporation
• Original Assignee: Intel Corporation
• Inventors: Johnson, David B., Myers, Mark S., Riggs, Eileen
• Primary Examiner(s): Smith, Jerry
• Assistant Examiner(s): BEAUSOLIEL JR, ROBERT W
• Application Number:
  US07/206,418
• Time in Patent Office: 616 Days
• Field of Search: 371/3, 371/68, 371/9, 371/25, 371/8, 371/8.1, 371/9.1, 371/25.1, 371/68.1, 371/68.3, 364/187
• US Class Current: 714/820
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/1608 Error detection by comparing the output signals of redundant hardware G06F11/1629, G06F11/1666 take precedence; error detection or correction in information storage based on relative movement between record carrier and transducer G11B20/18; checking static stores for correct operation G11C29/00; for logic circuits H03K19/003, H03K19/007; for pulse counters or frequency dividers H03K21/40
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/2215 to test error correction or detection circuits
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/267 Reconfiguring circuits for testing, e.g. LSSD, partitioning

Abstract

An integrated circuit module (200) in which an error detection circuit (234, 263) compares data (204) generated internally on module (200) with data (108) generated externally from another substantially identical module (100). An error detect output (238) is asserted upon the condition that data (204) generated internally on module (200) and data (108) generated externally from module (100) do not match. A circuit (222, 224) alters the internally generated data (204) by injecting erroneous data into the internally generated data (204) to thereby generate altered data (230). Error anticipation control logic (210) generates a test condition (214, 216), which corresponds to the expected error condition caused by altered data. Comparison circuit (242) compares the actual error detect output (238, 240) with expected error detect output (214, 215). An error output (244) is asserted if the actual error detect output (238, 240) and the expected error detect output (214, 216) do not match.

Claims

1. In an integrated circuit module (200) in which an error detection circuit (236) compares data (204) generated internally on said module (200) with data (108) generated externally from another substantially identical module (100) to thereby assert an error detect output (240) upon the condition that said data (204) generated internally on said module (200) and said data (108) generated externally from said other module (100) do not match, the improvement comprising:

means (220) for altering said internally generated data (204) by injecting erroneous data into said internally generated data (204) to thereby generate altered data (232);

said means (220) for altering said internally generated data (204) including first means (224) for digitally storing data, said data being shifted upon application of a clock pulse, said first means being driven by a clock pulse source (201), said second means (231) for combining the output (228) of said first means (224) and said data (204);

error anticipation means (210) for generating a test condition (216), which test condition corresponds to an expected error condition caused by said altered data (232) at the error detect output (240) of said error detection circuit (236);

said error anticipation means (210) being a circuit (56) with two stable states that can be changed from one state to the other, said circuit being driven alternately between said one state and said other state by said clock pulse source (201); and

,

comparison means (242) for comparing said actual error detect output (240) with said expected error detect output (216).

2. The combination in accordance with claim 1 wherein said first means (224) is a shiftchain and said second means (231) is an exclusive OR;

and,

said circuit (56) with two stable states is a flip-flop.

3. The combination in accordance with claim 2 wherein said comparison means (242) includes means (80, 84) for generating an error output (86) upon the condition that said actual error detect output (240) and said expected error detect output (216) do not match.

4. The combination in accordance with claim 1 wherein said comparison means (242) includes means (80, 84) for generating an error output (86) upon the condition that said actual error detect output (240) and said expected error detect output (216) do not match.