Creation of three dimensional objects

• US 4,915,757 A
• Filed: 05/05/1988
• Issued: 04/10/1990
• Est. Priority Date: 05/05/1988
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Spectra-Physics Incorporated (MKS Instruments Incorporated)
• Original Assignee: Spectra-Physics Incorporated (MKS Instruments Incorporated)
• Inventors: Rando, Joseph F.
• Primary Examiner(s): Simmons, David
• Application Number:
  US07/190,604
• Time in Patent Office: 705 Days
• Field of Search: 156/155, 156/58-59, 156/350, 156/64, 156/344, 364/474.05, 364/474.08, 364/474.37, 364/474.04, 364/474.35, 434/82, 434/96, 434/150, 428/313.3, 428/313.5, 428/317.3, 428/407, 428/402
• US Class Current: 156/64
• CPC Class Codes: B22C 7/00 Patterns; Manufacture thereof so far as not provided for in other classes
• CPC Class Codes: B29C 64/141 using only solid materials
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 19/41 characterised by interpolation, e.g. the computation of intermediate points between programmed end points to define the path to be followed and the rate of travel along that path G05B19/25, G05B19/31, G05B19/37, G05B19/39, G05B19/40 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 19/4207 in which a model is traced or scanned and corresponding data recorded
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 2219/37425 Distance, range
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 2219/49012 Remove material by laser beam, air, water jet to form 3-D object
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 2219/49013 Deposit layers, cured by scanning laser, stereo lithography SLA, prototyping
• CPC Class Codes: Y10T 156/1906 Delaminating means responsive to feed or shape at delamination
• CPC Class Codes: Y10T 428/2982 Particulate matter [e.g., sphere, flake, etc.]

Abstract

Three dimensional objects or models, such as three dimensional images or shapes stored in a computer, are generated as real models by addition of material to a base, such as with photo-hardenable liquid, or by removal of material from an initially oversized mass. Optical feedback is employed to monotor the actual condition of the model being formed, at each work site. The condition of the model at the work site, e.g. the presence or absence of material, is fed back to the machine or building tool, or to a computer controlling the tool. On the basis of such monitoring and feedback, decisions are made whether or not to perform more work at any particular work site. In this way, the actual three dimensional model being constructed is made to conform substantially to stored information relative to the desired dimensions of the model. In a preferred embodiment, models are produced by ablating a mass of small spheres held together by a relatively weak wax or cement. The spheres are cemented together preferably only at their small areas of contact. The ablating may be accomplished by a laser beam whose energy is focused in succession on balls which are to be removed, heating them and breaking the wax or cement bonds. Feedback of the model condition may be optical, e.g. by laser distance measuring non-contact sensors. Alternatively, the spherical balls may be removed by blasts of hot air or gas delivered through a narrow tube. In this case monitoring and feedback may be via measuring of capacitance between the air-delivering tube and the model, representing distance, or by monitoring of the pressure in the tube, indicating distance from the model.

Claims

1. A method of constructing a three dimensional solid model, said method comprising,

(a) scanning a first area having a plurality of predetermined, known work location sites with a work element which can be selectively activated either to perform work or not to perform work at each one of the work location sites,

(b) supplying model information to the work element during said scanning of said first area,

(c) activating the work element to perform work at each of the work location sites only when the model information signals that work is to be done at that site,

(d) examining the actual condition of material at each site as affected by the action of the work element on the site,

(e) feeding back information on said actual condition of material at each site,

(f) comparing the feedback information on the actual condition of material at each site with the desired condition of material at that site as called for by the model information supplied pursuant to paragraph (b),

(g) making an appropriate correction for increasing or decreasing the amount of work done by the work element when the difference between the actual condition and the desired condition of the material at the work sites is greater than a selected difference,

(h) moving the work element to a second area having a plurality of predetermined and known work location sites,

(i) repeating steps (a) through (g) for the second area, and

(j) repeating step (i) for additional areas until the solid model has been physically constructed by the action of the work element.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the model creation process is a subtractive process, and wherein monitoring of the actual condition of each work site and feedback of that condition are accomplished by monitoring the distance between the work element and the work site at which it is generally operating.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the monitoring of the distance between the work element and the work site comprises measuring and monitoring electrical compacity between the end of the work element and the work site, thereby indicating distance between the end of the work element and the work site.

4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the work element comprises an end effector directing a laser beam at the block of material.

5. The method according to claim 2, wherein the work element comprises a narrow tube or nozzle delivering a stream of hot gas effective to remove material locally from the block or mass of material.

6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the distance between the work element and the work site is monitored by measuring and monitoring the pressure in the work element tube, reflecting the distance from the end of the tube to the work site.

7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the mass or block of material comprises a mass of small generally spherical balls adhered together at their points of contact by a weak cementing means which will release the bond between the balls at an elevated temperature.

8. The method according to claim 5, wherein the monitoring of distance between the work element and the work site is accomplished by measuring and monitoring electrical capacitance between the end of the work element tube and the work site on the block of material.

9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of monitoring the condition of the object at the various work sites comprises measuring and monitoring the shape of the forming object at particular work sites using non-contact laser distance measuring means separate from the work element, with the monitored information relating to the work site fed back to a controller for the work element.

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the monitoring of the actual condition of the model being formed comprises measuring and monitoring the distance of the work element or tool from the work site at which the work element is generally operating, thereby indicating actual progress in the building of the model at the particular work site.

11. A method for automated production of a three dimensional model, comprising,

providing a block or mass of ablatable material which has dimensions larger than those of the three dimensional shape to be created,

moving an end effector tool around the surface of the mass or block of material to remove portions of the block of material as required by the shape to be produced, the end effector tool being effective to direct a stream of energy at specific work sites on the block of material at which the end effector tool is aimed,

monitoring the dimensions of material at work sites to determine the condition of the work site, i.e. the amount of material which remains at the work site,

feeding back information from such monitoring of the dimensions at the work sites to a controller for the end effector tool, and making decisions in the controller as to whether further energy is to be directed at particular work sites based on the information fed back to the controller, and effecting such decisions by either directing further energy to a work site using the end effector tool or not directing further energy to the work site,

and repeating the steps of directing energy at work sites to remove material, monitoring the condition or dimension of the mass of material at work sites, and feeding back such monitored information and controlling the tool based on such fedback information, while minipulating the end effector tool to all facets of the block of material at which it is necessary to remove material, until the finished three dimensional model in the desired shape has been produced.

12. The method according to claim 11, wherein the step of monitoring the condition of the work piece or mass of material at various work sites is accomplished by measuring the distance between the end effector and the work site on the block of material.

13. The method according to claim 11, wherein the block or mass of ablatable material comprises a mass of small generally spherical balls retained together at their points of contact by a relatively weak adhesive material forming bonds between adjacent spherical balls, the adhesive material being responsive to the energy from the end effector to release the bond between adjacent spherical balls when a spherical ball absorbs sufficient energy.

14. The method according to claim 13, wherein the energy comprises heat energy.

15. The method according to claim 13, wherein the relatively weak adhesive bonding the spherical balls is present substantially only at points of contact between adjacent balls, with interstices among the balls being substantially empty of the adhesive material, and the method further including adding a permanent bonding cement into the interstices among the spherical balls after completion of the desired shape to form permanent bonds among the balls to retain the completed three dimensional model in its final shape.

16. The method according to claim 11, wherein the step of monitoring the dimensions of the work piece or block of material comprises using laser distance measuring non-contact devices to determine the location of the surface of the forming model at various work site.

17. Apparatus for automated production of a three-dimensional model, comprising,

a block or mass of ablatable material which has dimensions larger than those of the three-dimensional shape to be created,

an end effector tool having means effective to direct a stream of energy at specific work sites on the block of material at which the end effector tool is aimed, and means for moving the end effector tool around the surface of the mass or block of material as required by the shape to be produced,

means for monitoring the dimensions of material at work sites to determine the condition of the work site, i.e. the amount of material which remains at the work site,

feedback means for feeding back information from the monitoring of dimensions at the work sites, and

controller means for controlling the end effector tool, for receiving fed back information from the feedback means, and for making decisions as to whether further energy is to be directed at particular work sites based on the information fed back to the controller, and for effecting such decisions by either directing further energy to a work site using the end effector tool or not directing further energy to the work site.