Formation volumetric evaluation while drilling

• US 4,949,575 A
• Filed: 02/27/1989
• Issued: 08/21/1990
• Est. Priority Date: 04/29/1988
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Anadrill Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Anadrill Incorporated
• Inventors: Rasmus, John C.
• Primary Examiner(s): Chapman, John
• Assistant Examiner(s): NOT, DEFINED
• Application Number:
  US07/316,256
• Time in Patent Office: 540 Days
• Field of Search: 73/151, 73/152, 73/151.5, 73/38, 166/250, 175/50, 175/39, 175/40
• US Class Current: 73/152.03
• CPC Class Codes: E21B 47/06 Measuring temperature or pressure
• CPC Class Codes: E21B 49/003 by analysing drilling variables or conditions E21B49/005 takes precedence; systems specially adapted for monitoring a plurality of drilling variables or conditions E21B44/00

Abstract

Formation Strength and other measurement while drilling parameters are combined to produce a formation volumetric analysis which may including the traditional volumetric components of clay volume, sand volume, total porosity, and water filled porosity. In shaley formations, the volumetric analysis may also include an excess or overpressure porosity. Formation Strength may be derived from measurements of torque and weight on bit and be corrected for such effects as bit dullness, mud weight and hydrostatic pressure balance.

Claims

1. A method for investigating properties of subsurface formations traversed by a borehole, the method comprising the steps of:

a. deriving a drilling signal indicative of the resistance of the formation to being drilled by a drill bit;

b. deriving a plurality of additional signals indicative of formation properties; and

b. in response to said drilling signal and to said additional signals, deriving a volumetric analysis of the subsurface formation.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said volumetric analysis of the subsurface formation includes a clay volume, a non-clay mineral volume, and a porosity.

3. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said additional signals include formation resistivity and formation natural gamma ray radioactivity.

4. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said drilling signal includes Formation Strength.

5. The method as recited in claim 4 wherein said Formation Strength has been corrected for the effects of bit wear.

6. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said step of deriving said drilling signal includes the steps of deriving a signal indicative of the weight applied to the bit and of deriving a signal indicative of the torque at the bit.

7. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein said step of deriving a volumetric analysis includes the step of determining a plurality of tool response equations which each relate a derivable formation property to a plurality of unknown formation properties selected from the group comprising:

clay volume, volume of a non-clay mineral, and pore volume.

8. The method as recited in claim 7 wherin one of said response equations comprises the following relationship:

##EQU7## where FS=measured Formation Strength

FS_ma =Formation Strength of mineral of volume=1

V_cl =clay volume

V_clzero =clay volume when FS=0

φ

_ezero =extrapolated porosity where FS=0.

9. The method as recited in claim 6 wherein said drilling signal is Formation Strength derived from measurements of downhole bit torque and downhole weight on bit.

10. The method as recited in claim 7 wherein said derivable properties include properties selected from the group comprising Formation Strength, resistivity, natural radioactivity, neutron porosity, gamma ray density, sonic travel-time, and deep induction resistivity.

11. The method as recited in claim 9 wherein Formation Strength is derived as a function of downhole weight on bit, rate of bit rotation, bit efficiency, gouging component of bit torque, rate of penetration and bit diameter.

12. The method as recited in claim 7 in which one of the response equations is the Formation Strength response equation which is a function of drilling mud weight.

13. The method as recited in claim 7 in which one of the response equations is the Formation Strength response equation which is a function of the difference between formation pressure and the drilling fluid pressure at the location of the bit.