Method and system for providing adaptive interactive command response

• US 4,959,864 A
• Filed: 09/19/1989
• Issued: 09/25/1990
• Est. Priority Date: 02/07/1985
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: US Philips Corporation (Koninklijke Philips N.V.)
• Original Assignee: US Philips Corporation (Koninklijke Philips N.V.)
• Inventors: Schaffers, Frederik J., Leopold, Frederik F., Van Nes, Floris L.
• Primary Examiner(s): NOT, DEFINED
• Assistant Examiner(s): NOT, DEFINED
• Application Number:
  US07/409,996
• Time in Patent Office: 371 Days
• Field of Search: 381/41-46, 381/51-53, 381/110, 367/198, 364/513.5
• US Class Current: 704/251
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 3/16 Sound input; Sound output speech processing G10L
• CPC Class Codes: G10L 15/22 Procedures used during a speech recognition process, e.g. man-machine dialogue

Abstract

A method and system for providing adaptive interactive command response to a user, in which the user may protest upon incorrect recognition by the system of a command given by the user in response to question from the system. If the number of such protests reaches a value which exceeds a predetermined level of at least two protests, the decision model used for command recognition by the system is adjusted so that during a certain time interval (T) thereafter a more explicit indication is given to the user concerning one or more of the commands which are recognized. In the normal case, when such threshold value is not exceeded, no indication is given to the user of commands which have been recognized and the system proceeds directly to the next question.

Claims

1. A method of carrying out successive sections of a program of operation of a user interactive system in accordance with successive verbal commands given by the user in response to successive verbal questions presented to the user by the system, each such question corresponding to a respective program section, said method comprising the steps of:

(a) presentation by the system to the user of a verbal question corresponding to a program section,

(b) in response to such question, the user gives a verbal command which is recognized by a command recognition unit comprised in the system,

(c) evaluation of the recognized command by the command recognition unit in accordance with a decision model therein, and selection on the basis of such evaluation of one verbal reaction from a group of at least two possible verbal reactions of the system to the recognized command,

(d) presentation by the system to the user of the chosen verbal system reaction, and

(e) repetition of steps (a) and (d) for succeeding program sections;

such method being characterized in that;

(f) a protest is given to the system by the user each time the user perceives that the system reaction given in step (d) of an existing program section is inconsistent with a user command given in step (b),

(g) the number of protests (`protest score`) is counted by the system at least during each program section, and

(h) when the protest score exceeds a predetermined level of at least two protests the decision model initiates a time interval (T), which continues for a plurality of succeeding user commands, during which interval the decision model chooses another verbal reaction from said group of possible verbal reactions of the system in response to one or more of the user commands recognized during said interval (T), such other verbal reaction including verbal identification of such commands as recognized by the command recognition unit.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein step (c) comprises:

evaluation of a recognized command by said command recognition unit by calculation of a command recognition score which indicates the reliability that such recognized command was a command given by the user;

comparison by a decision unit comprised in said system of the recognition score of a recognized command with a threshold value such that, if the recognition score exceeds said threshold value the chosen verbal system reaction is to immediately present the user a following question, and if the recognition score is below said threshold value the chosen verbal system reaction is to give the user verbal identification of said recognized command; and

if said protest score exceeds said predetermined level of at least two protests, said threshold level of said recognition score is increased at least during said time interval (T).

3. A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that if said protest score exceeds said predetermined level of at least two protests, then during said time interval (T) the chosen system verbal reaction is to give the user information describing each command recognized by said command recognition unit.

4. A method as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that in response to a user protest the system presents the user with a verbal question whether the command recognized by the command recognition unit is also the command which had been given by the user.

5. A method as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that said command recognition unit recognizes an affirmative or negative answer by the user to the question presented by the system in response to a user protest.

6. A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that if during said time interval (T) the number of protests again reaches a level which exceeds said predetermined level the duration of said time interval (T) is extended.

7. A user interactive system for carrying out successive sections of a program in accordance with successive verbal commands given by the user in response to successive verbal questions presented to the user by the system, such system comprising:

an activation unit including a question unit for presenting verbal questions to the user and a command status unit for presenting to the user a verbal system reaction in response to each user command;

a command recognition unit for recognizing each user command;

a decision unit comprised in said command recognition unit for evaluating the reliability of recognition of each user command, and on the basis of such evaluation selecting one verbal reaction from a group of at least two possible verbal reactions of the system to such user command, the chosen system reaction being in accordance with a predetermined decision model;

a protest recognition unit for receiving a protest from the user each time the user perceives that the system reaction given in response to a user command is inconsistent with such command;

a counter coupled to the protest recognition unit for counting the number of user protests (`protest score`) at least during each program section; and

a comparison circuit coupled to said counter for comparing the protest score of said counter with a predetermined level of at least two protests and supplying a control signal to said decision unit if said protest score exceeds said predetermined level;

said control signal causing said decision unit to initiate a time interval (T) during which interval said decision unit chooses another verbal reaction from said group of possible verbal reactions of said system in response to one or more user commands recognized by said command recognition unit during said time interval (T), said other verbal system reaction being presented to the user by said command status unit and including information describing such recognized commands.

8. A system in accordance with claim 7, characterized in that during an existing program section the command recognition unit compares each recognized user command with a reference pattern stored therein of possible user commands relating to such program section;

the sequence in which the recognized command is so compared being in accordance with a sequence of probabilities of occurrence of such stored commands during the existing program step, the command in said pattern having the highest probability of occurrence being first compared with the recognized command.

9. A user interactive system as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that at least during said time interval (T) following said control signal said decision unit causes said activation unit to give the user, in response to user commands, a system verbal reaction which identifies one or more of such commands as recognized by said command recognition unit.

10. A user interactive system as claimed in claim 9, characterized in that if a user protest is received by said protest recognition unit in response to identification of a recognized command, said question unit questions the user whether the recognized command was a command which had been given by the user and said command recognition unit is adapted to recognize whether the user gives an affirmative or negative answer to such question.

11. A user interactive system as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that said decision unit comprises a detection unit for detecting whether another control signal is produced by said comparison circuit within said time interval (T) following production of a prior control signal, and if so said decision unit is adapted to extend said time interval (T).