Air traffic control training system

• US 4,979,137 A
• Filed: 04/01/1988
• Issued: 12/18/1990
• Est. Priority Date: 11/18/1986
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: UFA, Inc.
• Original Assignee: UFA, Inc.
• Inventors: Moody, Thomas D., Gerstenfeld, Arthur, Gualtieri, Michael N.
• Primary Examiner(s): Black, Thomas G.
• Application Number:
  US07/176,639
• Time in Patent Office: 991 Days
• Field of Search: 364/200, 364/900, 364/300, 364/513, 364/578, 364/439
• US Class Current: 703/8
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/91 for traffic control G01S13/93 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 9/006 for locating or ranging of objects
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 706/905 Vehicle or aerospace

Abstract

An air traffic control training system and method for interacting with a user, the system and method generating a representation of at least one moving aircraft having an initial position and heading for producing a dynamic simulation of an air traffic scenario. Controller commands issued by a user are entered for altering the air traffic scenario. Rules and procedures stored in a knowledge base are compared to the present state of the simulation of the air traffic scenario or to the controller command by an expert system for issuing a warning upon the immediate or foreseeable failure to observe any rule or procedure in the knowledge base.

Claims

1. A traffic control training system for interacting with a user, comprising:

means for generating a representation of at least one moving vehicle having an initial position and heading for producing a dynamic simulation of a traffic scenario;

means for entering a controller command from the user for altering the traffic scenario simulation;

a knowledge base for storing accepted rules and procedures applicable to the traffic scenario simulation; and

a comparison module for comparing the rules and procedures to at least one of the present state of the simulation of the traffic scenario and the controller command and for issuing an alert upon the immediate and foreseeable failure of the user to observe any rule or procedure in the knowledge base.

2. The system of claim 1 in which said means for generating includes simulated display means for displaying the dynamic simulation of the traffic scenario.

3. The system of claim 2 in which said means for displaying further includes means for generating an inset for displaying the alert issued by said system.

4. The system of claim 3 in which said system includes means for generating and displaying a warning message and an explanation of the warning message within the inset.

5. The system of claim 1 in which said knowledge base includes a record of the performance of an expert traffic controller for the traffic scenario and said comparison module compares the record for generating instructions to the user.

6. The system of claim 1 in which said system further includes means for producing a verbal alert for informing the user that a rule or procedure has been violated.

7. The system of claim 1 in which said means for entering further includes pseudo-pilot means, interconnected to said means for generating, for responding to verbal commands issued by the user for altering the traffic scenario simulation.

8. The system of claim 7 in which said pseudo-pilot means includes voice recognition means for electronically responding to verbal commands issued by the user to alter the traffic scenario simulation.

9. The system of claim 7 in which said pseudo-pilot means includes a terminal having a touch-sensitive screen for entering the controller commands by a person responding to verbal commands issued by the user.

10. The system o claim 7 in which said pseudo-pilot means further includes voice synthesizing means controlled by said system for verbally acknowledging controller commands.

11. The system of claim 1 in which said means for generating further includes:

means for displaying the dynamic simulation of the traffic scenario; and

control panel means and instrumentation means for enabling control by the user of said means for displaying and for simulating the controls present in the work environment of a traffic controller.

12. The system of claim 1 further including storage means for storing the dynamic simulation of the traffic scenario together with the controller commands as they are issued by the user during the simulation and the alerts issued by said system.

13. The system of claim 1 in which said means for generating further includes:

means for displaying the traffic scenario simulation;

means for establishing an inset on said means for displaying;

clock means for generating time increments to index the generated traffic scenario simulation; and

means for representing the generated time increments within the inset on said means for displaying.

14. The system of claim 13 further including:

storage means, responsive to said clock means, for storing the traffic scenario simulation; and

means for addressing a selected time increment to replay the scenario on said means for displaying.

15. The system of claim 13 in which said means for generating further includes means for advancing the traffic scenario simulation to a predetermined increment of time.

16. The system of claim 1 further including a printer for providing a hard copy of the dynamic simulation.

17. A traffic control training system for interacting with at least one user, comprising:

at least one training unit including;

means for generating a representation of at least one moving vehicle having an initial position and heading for producing a dynamic simulation of a selected traffic scenario;

means for displaying said dynamic simulation of the traffic scenario; and

means for entering a controller command from the user for altering the traffic scenario simulation;

a knowledge base for storing accepted rules and procedures applicable to the traffic scenario simulation; and

a comparison module for comparing the rules and procedures to at least one of the present state of the simulation of the traffic scenario and the controller command and for issuing an alert upon the immediate and foreseeable failure of the user to observe any rule or procedure.

18. The system of claim 17 in which said knowledge base includes a record of the performance of an expert traffic controller for the traffic scenario and said comparison module compares the record for generating instructions to the user.

19. The system of claim 17 further including:

a plurality of training units;

a network bus for interconnecting said plurality of training units; and

a supervisor unit interconnected to said plurality of training units over said network bus, said supervisor unit including means for selectively displaying the traffic scenario simulation selected at each of said plurality of training units.

20. The system of claim 19 further including means for entering a supervisor command for altering the traffic scenario simulation displayed on said means for displaying at one or more of said plurality of training units.

21. The system of claim 19 in which said supervisor unit further includes means for detecting warnings issued at any of said plurality of training units.

22. The system of claim 17 in which said means for displaying at each of said plurality of training units further includes means for generating an inset for displaying the alert issued by said system.

23. The system of claim 22 in which said system includes means for generating and displaying a warning message and an explanation of the warning message within the inset at each of the plurality of training units.

24. The system of claim 17 wherein said system further includes means for producing a verbal warning for informing the suer that a rule or procedure has been violated.

25. The system of claim 17 in which said means for entering further includes pseudo-pilot means interconnected to said means for generating for responding to verbal commands issued by the user to alter the traffic scenario simulation.

26. The system of claim 25 in which said pseudo-pilot means include voice recognition means for electronically responding to verbal commands issued by the user for altering the traffic scenario simulation.

27. The system of claim 25 in which said pseudo-pilot means include a terminal having a touch-sensitive screen for entering the controller commands by a person responding to verbal commands issued by the user.

28. The system of claim 25 in which said pseudo-pilot means further include voice synthesizing means controlled by said system for verbally acknowledging controller commands.

29. The system of claim 17 in which said means for generating further includes control panel means and instrumentation means for enabling control of said display by the user and for simulating the controls present in the work environment o a traffic controller.

30. The system of claim 17 in which said means for generating further includes:

means for generating an inset on said means for displaying;

clock means for generating time increments to index the generated traffic scenario; and

means for representing the generated increments of time within the inset on said means for displaying.

31. The system of claim 30 further including:

storage means responsive to said clock means for storing the traffic scenario simulation time increments; and

means for addressing a selected time increment to replay the scenario simulation on said means for displaying.

32. A traffic control training system for interacting with a user, comprising:

a training unit including;

means for generating a representation of at least one moving vehicle having an initial position and heading for producing a dynamic simulation of a selected traffic scenario;

means for displaying said dynamic simulation of the traffic scenario;

means for entering a controller command from the user for altering the traffic scenario simulation; and

means for verbally acknowledging controller commands in response to means for entering a controller command from the user;

a knowledge base for storing accepted rules and procedures applicable to the traffic scenario simulation; and

an expert system for comparing the rules and procedures to at least one of the present state of the simulation of the traffic scenario and the controller command and for issuing a warning upon immediate and foreseeable failures of the user to observe any rule or procedure in the knowledge base.

33. The system of claim 32 in which said system further includes means for generating a verbal warning and explanation of the warning in response to said system issuing a warning upon the immediate or foreseeable failure to observe any rule or procedure in the knowledge base.

34. The system of claim 32 in which the training unit further includes control panel means and instrumentation means for enabling control of said means for displaying by the user and for simulating the controls present in the work environment of a traffic controller.

35. A method for training traffic controllers on a traffic control training system for interacting with a user, comprising:

generating a representation of at least one moving vehicle having an initial position and heading for producing a dynamic simulation of a traffic scenario;

entering a controller command from the user for altering the traffic scenario simulation;

providing a knowledge base for storing accepted rules and procedures applicable to the traffic scenario simulation;

comparing the rules and procedures to at least one of the present state of the simulation of the traffic scenario and the controller command; and

issuing a warning upon the immediate and foreseeable failures of the user to observe any rule or procedure in the knowledge base.

36. The method of claim 35 in which generating further includes displaying the dynamic simulation of the traffic scenario on a simulated display.

37. The method of claim 35 in which generating further includes:

generating an inset on the simulated display;

generating time increments to index the generated traffic scenario; and

representing the generated measurements of time within the inset of the simulated display.

38. The method of claim 37 further including:

storing the traffic scenario time increments in response to generating time increments; and

addressing a selected time increment to replay the scenario on the simulated display.

39. The method of claim 35 in which the step of comparing further compares a record of the performance of an expert traffic controller to the traffic scenario.

40. The method of claim 39 in which said step of issuing a warning further includes the step of generating instructions to the student.

41. A traffic control training system for interacting with a user, comprising:

means for generating a representation of at least one moving vehicle having an initial position and heading for producing a dynamic simulation of a traffic scenario;

means for entering a controller command from the user for altering the traffic scenario simulation;

a knowledge base for storing accepted rules and procedures applicable to the traffic scenario simulation including a record of the performance of an expert traffic controller for the traffic scenario; and

a comparison module for comparing the rules and procedures to least one of the present state of the simulation of the traffic scenario, the performance of the expert traffic controller, and the controller command, for issuing an alert upon the immediate foreseeable failure of the user to observe any rule or procedure in the knowledge base and for generating instructions to the user.

42. A traffic control training network comprising:

a plurality of training units, each of said training units including;

means for generating a representation of at least one moving vehicle having an initial position and heading for producing a dynamic simulation of a selected traffic scenario;

means for displaying said dynamic simulation of the traffic scenario; and

means for entering a controller command from a user for altering the traffic scenario;

a knowledge base for storing accepted rules and procedures applicable to the traffic scenario simulation;

a comparison module, interconnected to said knowledge base and each of said training units, for comparing the rules and procedures to at least one of the present state of each traffic scenario simulation and the controller command, for issuing an alert upon immediate and foreseeable failures of the user to observe any rule or procedure, and for generating and displaying a warning message and an explanation of the warning message on said means for displaying; and

a network bus for interconnecting said plurality of training units.

43. The system of claim 42 further including a supervisor unit interconnected to said plurality of training units over said network bus, said supervisor unit including means for selectively displaying the traffic scenario selected at each of said plurality of training units.