Computer-based controller and bipolar PWM driver arrangement for air core gauge control

• US 4,991,098 A
• Filed: 11/25/1988
• Issued: 02/05/1991
• Est. Priority Date: 11/25/1988
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Delphi Technologies, Inc. (BorgWarner Incorporated)
• Original Assignee: General Motors Corporation (Motors Liquidation Co. GUC Trust)
• Inventors: Dantzler, Maurice L.
• Primary Examiner(s): Lall, Parshotam S.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Queen, Tyrone
• Application Number:
  US07/275,879
• Time in Patent Office: 802 Days
• Field of Search: 364/424.01, 364/556, 340/870.19, 324/140 R, 324/146
• US Class Current: 701/1
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 7/00 Instruments capable of converting two or more currents or voltages into a single mechanical displacement G01R9/00 takes precedence

Abstract

A control arrangement including a computer-based controller and bipolar driver for bidirectional current control of air core gauge coils by pulse-width-modulation (PWM). The computer-based controller processes input information to determine the desired deflection of the pointer, and looks-up previously stored PWM duty cycle commands for energizing the gauge coils. The bipolar drivers modulate the polarity of the voltage applied to the coils in accordance with the duty cycle commands. Since the drivers are bipolar, a zero strength magnetic field vector is achieved with a duty cycle command of 50 percent. This eliminates discontinuities in the region of zero strength magnetic field vector, and avoids the requirement of generating duty cycles of 0 percent and 100 percent to achieve a full 360 degrees of pointer deflection. Potential discontinuities in the generation of the duty cycles due to input data processing requirements is eliminated by scaling the duty cycles into the range of (DELTA)% to (100-DELTA)%.

Claims

1. Drive apparatus for an air core gauge, comprising in combination:

driver means for applying a bipolar direct voltage to at least one coil of said gauge to energize the coil with current of like polarity, the driver means alternately reversing the polarity of the applied voltage, and therefore the polarity of the energizing current, according to a PWM duty cycle control signal defining the percentage of time that voltage of one polarity is applied to said coil as compared to voltage of an opposite polarity; and

computer-based control means for (1) synchronously receiving and processing input data related to a parameter to be displayed by said gauge, (2) determining a desired current for said coil for producing a desired deflection of said gauge, (3) generating a PWM duty cycle value in relation to said desired current such that duty cycles in the range of 0%-50% define a full range of desired current of said one polarity, and duty cycles in the range of 50%-100% define the full range of desired current of said opposite polarity, and (4) scaling the PWM duty cycle value into the range of (DELTA)% to (100-DELTA)% to form said PWM duty cycle control signal for said driver means, the term DELTA being defined in relation to the time required by said computer-based control means to receive and process said input data.

2. The improvement set forth in claim 1, wherein said PWM duty cycle control signal is determined substantially according to the expression:

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">50+[f(DEFL) * 50 * (2DELTA)]

where f(DEFL) designates a sinusoidal function of a desired deflection DEFL, and the quantity (1-2DELTA) represents a fractional scaling factor based on the term DELTA.

3. The improvement set forth in claim 1, wherein said driver means includes first and second means for independently energizing first and second coils of said air core gauge, and the control unit generates duty cycle values %DC₁ and %DC₂ for said first and second coils substantially according to the expressions:

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">%DC=50+[sin(DEFL) * 50 * (1-2DELTA)]

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">%DC=50+[cos(DEFL) * 50 * (1-2DELTA)]

where DEFL designates a desired deflection of the gauge, and the quantity (1-2DELTA) represents a fractional scaling factor based on the term DELTA.

4. The improvement set forth in claim 1, wherein the term DELTA is determined in relation to a force required to deflect the gauge to a desired deflection angle DEFL.