Workpiece inspection method

• US 4,991,304 A
• Filed: 01/26/1989
• Issued: 02/12/1991
• Est. Priority Date: 06/11/1987
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Renishaw PLC Gloucester Street Wotton-Under-Edge Gloucestershire GL12 7DN
• Original Assignee: Renishaw PLC
• Inventors: McMurtry, David R.
• Primary Examiner(s): Shoap, Allan N.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Wirthlin, Alvin
• Application Number:
  US07/305,727
• Time in Patent Office: 747 Days
• Field of Search: 33/503, 33/556, 33/557, 33/558, 33/559, 33/560, 33/561, 33/572, 33/832, 33/545, 33/546, 33/1 M, 33/505, 33/504, 364/560
• US Class Current: 33/505
• CPC Class Codes: G01B 21/045 Correction of measurements G01B9/02055 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01B 7/008 using coordinate measuring machines

Abstract

A succession of nominally identical workpieces is measured using a probe on a coordinate measuring machine. To enable most of the workpieces to be probed at a fast speed (step 40), and compensate for the errors thereby introduced, one workpiece is also probed at a slow speed (step 32). For that workpiece, a series of error values is calculated (step 36) from the differences between the fast and slow measurements. The subsequent fast measurements on succeeding workpieces are corrected by making use of these error values (step 42).

Claims

1. A method of inspecting a series of workpieces, in which a workpiece-sensing probe is moved into a position-sensing relationship with each workpiece and a position reading taken, the method comprising the following steps in any order in which (i) step (c) is performed after steps (a) and (b), and (ii) step (e) is performed after step (d):

(a) moving the probe into the position-sensing relationship with one said workpiece at a relatively slow speed, and taking a position reading,

(b) moving the probe into said position-sensing relationship with said one workpiece at a relatively fast speed, and taking a position reading,

(c) recording a difference value representing the difference between the two readings of steps (a) and (b),

(d) moving the probe into said position-sensing relationship with another said workpiece at the fast speed, and taking a position reading, and

(e) using said recorded difference value to compensate the reading taken in step (d), thereby reducing any probe and dynamic errors in said reading;

wherein steps (a), (b) and (c) are repeated at a plurality of points on said one workpiece, and steps (d) and (e) are performed at each corresponding point on said other workpiece.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein steps (d) and (e) are repeated on a succession of substantially identical workpieces.

3. A method according to claim 1, in which the probe is a trigger probe.

4. A method according to claim 3, in which the probe is calibrated or datumed at the relatively slow speed, giving an offset which is used to correct the reading in step (a).

5. A method according to claim 1, in which the probe is a measurement probe, and each of steps (a), (b) and (d) is performed as part of a scanning process.

6. A method of inspecting a series of identical workpieces, in which a workpiece sensing probe is moved into a position-sensing relationship with each workpiece and a position reading taken, the method comprising the following steps in any order in which (i) step (c) is performed after steps (a) and (b), and (ii) step (e) is performed after step (d):

(a) moving the probe into a position-sensing relationship with at least one surface point of one workpiece at a relatively slow speed, and taking a position reading;

(b) moving the probe into a position-sensing relationship with said surface point of said one workpiece at a relatively fast speed, and taking a position reading;

(c) recording a difference value representing the difference between the two readings of steps (a) and (b);

(d) moving the probe into said position-sensing relationship with another workpiece at a surface point corresponding to the surface point read on said one workpiece at said fast speed, and taking a position reading; and

(e) using said recorded difference value to compensate the reading taken in step (d), thereby reducing any probe and dynamic errors in said reading.

7. A method according to claim 6, wherein steps (a), (b) and (c) are repeated at a plurality of points on said one workpiece, and then subsequently steps (d) and (e) are performed at each corresponding point on said other workpiece.

8. A method according to claim 6, wherein steps (d) and (e) are repeated on a succession of substantially identical workpieces.

9. A method according to claim 6, wherein the probe is a trigger probe.

10. A method according to claim 9 wherein the probe is calibrated or datumed at the relatively slow speed, giving an offset which is used to correct the reading in step (a).

11. A method according to claim 6, wherein the probe is a measurement probe, and each of steps (a), (b) and (d) is performed as part of a scanning process.