Method and apparatus for evaluating a load bearing surface such as a seat

• US 5,060,174 A
• Filed: 04/18/1990
• Issued: 10/22/1991
• Est. Priority Date: 04/18/1990
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: DH Blair & Company Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Biomechanics Corporation of America (CellMetrix, Inc.)
• Inventors: Gross, Clifford M.
• Primary Examiner(s): Lall, Parshotam S.
• Assistant Examiner(s): PIPALA, EDWARD J
• Application Number:
  US07/510,653
• Time in Patent Office: 552 Days
• Field of Search: 364/413.01, 364/413.02, 364/550, 364/554, 364/558, 364/578, 364/551.01, 297/283, 297/284
• US Class Current: 702/139
• CPC Class Codes: A47C 31/126 for chairs
• CPC Class Codes: B60N 2/002 Seats provided with an occupancy detection means mounted therein or thereon detection means responsive to presence or absence of children B60N2/266
• CPC Class Codes: G01G 19/00 Weighing apparatus or methods adapted for special purposes not provided for in the preceding groups electric measuring arrangements involving comparison with a reference value G01R17/00
• CPC Class Codes: G01G 19/44 for weighing persons
• CPC Class Codes: G01G 19/52 Weighing apparatus combined with other objects, e.g. furniture with walking sticks A45B3/08
• CPC Class Codes: G01L 5/00 Apparatus for, or methods of, measuring force, work, mechanical power, or torque, specially adapted for specific purposes
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 99/00 Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass

Abstract

A method and apparatus are described for evaluating a load bearing surface such as a seat. Preferred apparatus for the practice of the invention comprises a plurality of sensors which are distributed across a load bearing surface such as a seat pan, apparatus for measuring the pressures exerted on the sensors when a weight is placed on the load bearing surface, and signal processing apparatus for evaluating the pressures that are measured. Advantageously, the signal processing apparatus can be utilized to store data which represents a comfort level for the load bearing surface and to evaluate the measured pressures in light of that data. For example, the data stored can be pressure measurements for a series of seats correlated with subjective appraisals of seat comfort and the evaluation can be performed by statistical analysis and comparison of the pressure measurements for a seat under test with the stored pressure measurements. Alternatively, the data stored can be a mathematical formula which relates pressure as measured at different areas of the seat pan to an index of comfort; and the evaluation can be performed simply by inserting the measured pressures into the formula and calculating the resulting index.

Claims

1. A method of evaluating a seat for comfort comprising the steps of:

establishing a standard for seat comfort which relates a human subject'"'"'s appraisal of seat comfort for a first seat to measurements of the pressure exerted by said human subject on a plurality of sensors distributed across a seat pan of said first seat when the subject is seated in said seat said standard being established by;

making a measurement at a plurality of points distributed across a seat pan of the first seat of pressures exerted by a human subject on said seat when the human subject is in the seat,

dividing the measurements so made into a plurality of sets which group together measurements made in a same area of the seat pan,

for each set, combining the measurements of said set to generate a value representative of the pressures exerted on that area, and

correlating the combined measurements with a subjective estimate of seat comfort,

making a measurement at a plurality of points distributed across a seat pan of a seat to be tested of pressures exerted by a human subject on said seat when the human subject is in the seat,

dividing the measurements so made into a plurality of sets which group together measurements made in a same area of the seat pan,

for each set, combining the measurements of said set to generate a value representative of the pressures exerted on that area, and

comparing the combined measurements relating to the seat being tested with the combined measurements of the standard to form an evaluation of the comfort of the seat being tested.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the measurements are divided into six sets.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the measurements are divided into six sets including a left bolster region, a left thigh region, a left buttock region, a right bolster region, a right thigh region, and a right buttock region.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of determining the sum of the measurements made in at least one set of measurements and the standard deviation of the measurements made in at least one set of measurements.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of determining for at least one set of measurements the difference in measurements between adjacent sensors and identifying at least one of the maximum difference and the minimum difference.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

establishing a standard for seat back comfort which relates a human subject'"'"'s appraisal of seat back comfort for a first seat to measurements of the pressure exerted by said human subject on a plurality of sensors distributed across a seat back of said first seat when the subject is seated in said seat said standard being established by;

making a measurement at a plurality of points distributed across a seat back of the first seat of pressures exerted by a human subject on said seat back when the human subject is in the seat,

dividing the measurements so made into a plurality of sets which group together measurements made in a same area of the seat back,

for each set, combining the measurements of said set to generate a value representative of the pressures exerted on that area, and

correlating the combined measurements with a subjective estimate of seat back comfort,

making a measurement at a plurality of points distributed across a seat back of a seat to be tested of pressures exerted by a human subject on said seat back when the human subject is in the seat,

dividing the measurements so made into a plurality of sets which group together measurements made in a same area of the seat back,

for each set, combining the measurements of said set to generate a value representative of the pressures exerted on that area, and

comparing the combined measurements relating to the seat back being tested with the combined measurements of the standard to form an evaluation of the comfort of the seat back being tested.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the measurements on the seat back are divided into six sets.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein the measurements on the seat back are divided into six sets including a left bolster region, a left lumbar region, a left thoracic region, a right bolster region, a right lumbar region, and a right thoracic region.

9. The method of claim 6 further comprising the steps of determining the sum of the measurements made in at least one set of measurements and the standard deviation of the measurements made in at least one set of measurements.

10. The method of claim 6 further comprising the steps of determining for at least one set of measurements the difference in measurements between adjacent sensors and identifying at least one of the maximum difference and the minimum difference.

11. A method of evaluating a seat for comfort comprising the steps of:

establishing an index of seat comfort which relates a human subject'"'"'s appraisal of seat comfort to measurements of the pressure exerted by said human subject on a plurality of sensors distributed across a seat pan of a seat;

testing a seat by making a measurement at a plurality of points distributed across a seat pan of pressures exerted by a human subject on said seat when the human subject is in the seat,

dividing the measurements so made into a plurality of sets which group together measurements made in a same area of the seat pan,

for each set combining the measurements of said set to generate a value representative of the pressures exerted on that area, and

comparing the combined measurements with the index of seat comfort.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the measurements are divided into six sets.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein the measurements are divided into six sets including a left bolster region, a left thigh region, a left buttock region, a right bolster region, a right thigh region, and a right buttock region.

14. The method of claim 11 further comprising the steps of determining the sum of the measurements made in at least one set of measurements and the standard deviation of the measurements made in at least one set of measurements.

15. The method of claim 11 further comprising the steps of determining for at least one set of measurements the difference in measurements between adjacent sensors and identifying at least one of the maximum difference and the minimum difference.

16. The method of claim 11 further comprising the steps of:

testing a seat by making a measurement at a plurality of points distributed across a seat back of pressures exerted by a human subject on said seat back when the human subject is in the seat,

dividing the measurements so made into a plurality of sets which group together measurements made in a same area of the seat back,

for each set, combining the measurements of said set to generate a value representative of the pressures exerted on that area, and

comparing the combined measurements with the index of seat comfort.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein the measurements are divided into six sets.

18. The method of claim 16 wherein the measurements are divided into six sets including a left bolster region, a left lumbar region, a left thoracic region, a right bolster region, a right lumbar region, and a right thoracic region.

19. The method of claim 16 further comprising the steps of determining the sum of the measurements made in at least one set of measurements and the standard deviation of the measurements made in at least one set of measurements.

20. The method of claim 16 further comprising the steps of determining for at least one set of measurements the difference in measurements between adjacent sensors and identifying at least one of the maximum difference and the minimum difference.

21. Apparatus for evaluating a seat for comfort comprising:

a two-dimensional array of sensors distributed across an area approximately as large as that of a seat pan of a first seat that is to be evaluated,

means for reading signals from said sensors that are representative of pressures exerted by a human subject when said subject is seated in said first seat,

means for processing said signals to form data values representative of said seat,

means for storing said data values for a second seat having a specified comfort level, and

means for comparing the data values derived from the first seat with the data values derived from the second seat to determine a comfort level for the first seat.

22. The apparatus of claim 21 further comprising a second two-dimensional array of sensors distributed across an area approximately as large as that of a seat back of a seat that is to be evaluated and means for reading signals from said sensors that are represenative of pressures exerted by a human subject when said subject is seated in said seat.

23. The apparatus of claim 21 wherein the reading means comprises means for selectively applying a voltage to each sensor and for determining the voltage drop across said sensor.

24. The apparatus of claim 21 wherein each sensor is a force sensing resistor whose resistance decreases with increasing pressure.