Aircraft traffic alert and collision avoidance device

• US 5,077,673 A
• Filed: 01/09/1990
• Issued: 12/31/1991
• Est. Priority Date: 01/09/1990
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Ryan International Corp. (Avidyne Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Ryan International Corp. (Avidyne Corporation)
• Inventors: Ryan, Dean E., Brodegard, William C., Ryan, Paul A.
• Primary Examiner(s): Black, Thomas G.
• Application Number:
  US07/462,387
• Time in Patent Office: 721 Days
• Field of Search: 364/460, 364/461, 364/424.06, 364/443, 364/452, 342/29-32, 342/455
• US Class Current: 701/301
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/74 Systems using reradiation of radio waves, e.g. secondary radar systems; Analogous systems
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/767 Responders; Transponders teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using reflecting targets or active targets F41G3/26
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/933 of aircraft or spacecraft

Abstract

A passive aircraft Traffic alert and Collision Avoidance device (TCAD) is based on sensing and responding to transponder replies of other aircraft to SSR interrogations. In order to avoid masking other aircraft replies by the host transponder TCAD repeatedly and randomly suppresses the host transponder and simultaneously listens for other aircraft replies. Suppression on each occasion is effective for an equal and predetermined duration which is much longer than a typical reply, in a preferred embodiment the suppression/listen duration is 725 μs. In this embodiment the time between successive suppression/listen occasions is random between 725 μs. and 5.025 ms. with an average value of about 2.9 ms. Digital signal processing is used to detect and discard garbled or overlapping replies. Each valid reply, exhibiting a minimum pulse amplitude, is decoded and correlated with a calibrated range parameter and given a time tag. Successive replies which match to within predetermined criteria in time and calibrated range are merged to track the positional relation between the host and other aircraft. The positional relation between other aircraft and the host are evaluated via a priority table in terms of relative altitude and range to locate that craft which poses the highest threat to the host. Parameters of such a craft are displayed. In the event a craft penetrates a shield of programmable size an audible alert is sounded. TCAD provides for shields for each of a plurality of flight regimes, such as terminal, standard and enroute. Selection among shields is via a single pushbutton. TCAD allows the pilot to program each of the different shield sizes. Peripheral functions such as altitude deviation alert, density altitude and barometric pressure correction for altitude reporting are also provided.

Claims

1. In a proximity warning system for a host aircraft which includes a host transponder and a reply detector, said proximity warning system based on evaluation of replies from transponders of other aircraft to interrogations from a Secondary Surveillance Radar, an improved reply detector comprising:

a) first means for suppressing said host transponder for a succession of suppression durations, wherein a delay between an end of one suppression duration and initiation of an adjacent suppression duration is no greater than about 8.5 ms., and wherein a ratio of the summation of time durations within a succession of suppression durations to a total time span encompassing said succession of suppression durations is in a range of about 13 to 20%,

b) a reply receiver,

c) data storage means responsive to said first means for storing data from said reply receiver only during a suppression duration, and

d) threat evaluation means responsive to said data storage means for signaling presence of a collision threat.

2. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 1 wherein said suppression durations are irregularly spaced in time and initiation of each of said suppression durations is determined on a random basis.

3. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 2 wherein each of said suppression durations is less than 1 ms.

4. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 2 wherein said first means establishes each of said suppression durations at about 725 μ

s. and delay between ending of one suppression duration and initiation of an adjacent suppression duration is random between about 725 μ

s. and 5075 μ

s.

5. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 2 wherein said first means establishes each of said suppression durations at about 725 μ

s. and delays between ending of one suppression duration and initiation of an adjacent suppression duration is random between about 3.6 ms. and 6.2 ms.

6. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 1 wherein said threat evaluation means includes:

d1) programmable means for selecting a threat threshold,

d2) comparing means for comparing a characteristic of a reply to said selected threat threshold for producing a distinctive output if said reply characteristic bears a predetermined relation to said selected threat threshold, and

d3) alerting means responsive to said distinctive output for alerting a pilot to a threat from a source of said reply.

7. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 6 wherein said comparing means compares an output amplitude from said reply receiver to said threat threshold.

8. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 6 wherein said comparing means includes differencing means for determining a difference between an altitude represented by a mode C reply code from said source of said reply and host aircraft altitude and producing said distinctive output if said difference is within a relative altitude window of said selected threat threshold.

9. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 7 or claim 8 wherein said programmable means for selecting a threat threshold includes:

d1a) a plurality of buttons, each for a different flight regime,

d1b) means responsive to depression of one of said buttons for selecting a corresponding preprogrammed threat threshold, and

d1c) means responsive to multiple depressions of one of said buttons for enabling alteration of a corresponding preprogrammed threat threshold.

10. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 6 which further includes display means for displaying parameters of at least one threat.

11. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 10 wherein said display means displays at least one parameter changing in relation to distance between host and said source of said reply.

12. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 10 which further includes display control means for selecting parameters from said source of said reply for display.

13. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 12 wherein said threat evaluation means includes priority means responsive to parameters of different reply source for selecting a primary threat for display.

14. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 13 wherein said display means includes means for displaying the existence of threats other than the threat being displayed.

15. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 6 wherein said alerting means includes:

d3a) a source of an audible tone for generating a tone in response to said distinctive output, and

d3b) means for energizing said audible tone for either continuous or a limited period of operation.

16. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 15 wherein said alerting means further includes:

d3c) muting means responsive to operation of an operator input for muting said source of an audible tone for a predetermined time, and

d3d) first programmable means for selecting said predetermined time.

17. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 16 wherein said alerting means further includes:

d3e) second programmable means for selecting continuous or limited period of operation of said source of said audible tone.

18. An improved reply detector as recited in claim 17 wherein said second programmable means includes means for selecting continuous or limited period of operation of said source of said audible tone for each of a plurality of different flight regimes.

19. A proximity warning system for host aircraft based on evaluation of replies from transponder equipped other aircraft to interrogations from a Secondary Surveillance Radar, said system including a host transponder and a reply detector, said reply detector comprising:

a) first means for repeatedly suppressing said host transponder for a sequence of suppression durations, each of a given, equal, duration whose initiation is selected within a given time window on a random basis,

b) a reply receiver,

c) data storage means responsive to said first means for storing data from said reply receiver only during a suppression duration, and

d) threat evaluation means responsive to said data storage means for signaling presence of a collision threat.

20. A proximity warning system as recited in claim 19 wherein said threat evaluation means includes a selectable threat threshold and means for comparing an output amplitude from said reply receiver to said threat threshold.

21. A proximity warning system as recited in claim 20 wherein said threat evaluation means includes an operator input for selecting said threat threshold.

22. A proximity warning system as recited in claim 19 wherein said threat evaluation means includes a selectable threat threshold and means for comparing a difference between host altitude and an altitude represented by a mode C reply to said threat threshold, where said threat threshold is a relative altitude threshold.

23. A proximity warning system as recited in claim 22 wherein said threat evaluation means includes an operator input for selecting said relative altitude threshold.

24. A proximity warning system as recited in claim 19 or 20 or 22 wherein said given duration of suppression is less than 1 ms.

25. A proximity warning system as recited in claim 19 or 20 or 22 wherein a ratio of the summation of time durations of a succession of said suppression durations to time encompassing said suppression durations is in a range of about 13% to about 20%.

26. A proximity warning system as recited in claim 19 wherein said threat evaluation means further includes display means for displaying parameters of at least one threat.

27. A proximity warning system as recited in claim 26 wherein said display means displays at least one parameter changing in relation to distance between threat and host.

28. A proximity warning system as recited in claim 26 wherein said threat evaluation means further includes display control means for selecting threat parameters for display.

29. A proximity warning system as recited in claim 28 wherein said threat evaluation means further includes priority means responsive to parameters of different threats for selecting a primary threat for display.

30. A proximity warning system as recited in claim 29 wherein said display means further includes means for displaying the existence of threats other than the threat being displayed.

31. In a proximity warning system based on receipt, at an own aircraft, of replies by transponders of other aircraft to interrogations from Secondary Surveillance Radar, a method of reducing the masking effect of own aircraft transponder replies comprising the steps of:

a) dividing time into a succession of time slices of different durations, each time slice including only one suppression duration, remaining time in any time slice available for reply transmissions,

b) actively asserting a suppression signal to an own aircraft transponder for the duration of each of said suppression durations,

c) disabling receipt of replies outside of a suppression duration,

d) wherein each of said suppression durations are selected to last for equal durations, and

e) initiating a suppression duration in a time slice at a time within said time slice selected at random.

32. A method as recited in claim 31 wherein said time slice durations and the duration of said suppression is selected to suppress less than about 20% of possible replies from said own aircraft transponder.

33. A method as recited in claim 32 wherein said suppression duration is smaller than a limit established by a time constant exhibited by a suppression input of said own aircraft transponder.

34. A method as recited in claim 31 wherein said time slice durations and the duration of said suppression is selected to suppress about 20% of possible replies from said own aircraft transponder.

35. A method as recited in claim 31 wherein said suppression duration is selected as less than 1 ms. and said remaining time averages less than about 8.5 ms.

36. A method as recited in claim 31 wherein said suppression duration is about 725 μ

s and said remaining time averages either about 3 ms. or about 4.9 ms.

37. A method as recited in claim 36 wherein said remaining time has durations in the range of about 725 μ

s to about 6.16 ms.

38. A method as recited in claim 31 wherein said suppression duration is about 725 μ

s and said remaining time averages about 3 ms.

39. A method as recited in claim 31 wherein said suppression duration is greater than a duration of a reply.

40. A method as recited in claim 39 wherein suppression duration is greater than a duration of a reply by a multiple of about 28.

41. In a proximity warning system based on receipt, at an own aircraft, of replies by transponders of other aircraft, a method of threat detection for treating otherwise ambiguous Mode A and Mode C replies comprising the steps of:

a) establishing a threat altitude region based on own aircraft altitude,

b) selecting for treatment as a possible Mode C reply only received data equivalent to a defined Mode C reply, and

c) selecting for treatment only a subset of those replies selected in step b), said subset comprising those replies representing an altitude within said threat altitude region.

42. A method as recited in claim 41 wherein said replies are replies to interrogations from an SSR and which includes the further steps of:

d) comparing replies with defined Mode C replies to differentiate possible Mode C replies from Mode A replies,

e) placing on a list to be considered as Mode A replies all replies with data which is not a defined Mode C reply and in addition replies not selected in step c), along with a time stamp indicating a time of receipt, and

f) comparing a time stamp associated with the subset of replies selected in step c) with time stamps of replies on said list of step e) and pairing replies with time stamp pairs meeting a predetermined time stamp criterion.

43. A method as recited in claim 42 in which said step e) also places, along with data on said list of step e) a value representing distance between own and other aircraft and wherein said step f) pairs replies based on said time stamp and said values representing distance.

44. A method as recited in claim 43 which includes the further steps of:

g) updating records in said list in terms of relative altitude and apparent distance,

h) determining from changes in relative altitude whether said relative altitude is increasing or decreasing, and

i) displaying relative altitude along with an indication of increasing or decreasing relative altitude.

45. A method as recited in claim 42 which further includes:

g) displaying an altitude difference based on own altitude and altitude corresponding to a possible mode C reply from said subset of step c).

46. A method as recited in claim 45 wherein said step g) further includes indicating whether said altitude corresponding to a possible mode C reply from said subset of step c) is above or below said own aircraft.

47. A method as recited in claim 46 which further includes:

h) displaying a mode A reply, paired with a possible mode C reply of step f).

48. A method as recited in any of claims 41-47, which further comprises:

i) establishing a threat prioritization table yielding a priority value for distance and altitude separations between host aircraft and source of a reply,

ii) processing entries on said list with said prioritization table to assign a priority value for entries on said list, and

iii) selecting from said list an entry of highest priority and

iv) driving a display with data from said entry selected in step iii).

49. A method as recited in claim 48 which comprises the further steps of:

v) selecting from said list entries of second and third highest priority value, and

vi) driving said display with data indicating whether or not there are entries of second and third highest priority value.

50. A method as recited in claim 41 wherein said step of establishing a threat altitude region based on own aircraft altitude comprises:

i) selecting a limiting altitude offset,

ii) establishing said threat altitude region as that altitude space within said limiting altitude offset from said own aircraft altitude.

51. A method as recited in claim 50 wherein said step i) comprises:

i1) programming a plurality of limiting altitude offsets, a different limiting altitude offset for each different zone of travel, and

i2) selecting a zone of travel to select the corresponding limiting altitude offset.

52. In a proximity warning system for host aircraft including a transponder and a reply detector and based on evaluation of replies from transponders of other aircraft, a reply detector and altitude alert comprising:

a) buffer means responsive to altitude measurement for reporting own aircraft altitude,

b) reply detecting means responsive to transponder replies from other aircraft for displaying proximate threats based on own aircraft altitude as determined from said buffer means,

c) recording means responsive to engaging an altitude alerting function for recording existing own aircraft altitude when said altitude alerting function is engaged,

d) comparing means enabled on engaging said altitude alerting function for comparing the own aircraft altitude recorded by said recording means with own aircraft altitude of said buffer means to generate an altitude difference, and

e) alarm means responsive to said altitude difference from said comparing means for producing an alarm when said altitude difference is increased above a predetermined altitude difference threshold.

53. The apparatus as recited in claim 52 which further includes:

f) control means for engaging and disengaging an altitude alerting function in response to depression of selected pushbuttons, said control means engaging said altitude alerting function on depression of said pushbuttons when said altitude alerting function is disengaged and disengaging said alerting function on depression of said pushbuttons when said altitude alerting function is engaged.

54. The apparatus as recited in claim 52 which further includes:

f) control means for disengaging an altitude alerting function in response to said comparing means indication of a difference between own altitude recorded by said recording means and own aircraft altitude as above a second predetermined altitude difference threshold.

55. The apparatus as recited in claim 52 where said reply detecting means further comprises:

b1) a source of an audible tone for generating a tone in response detection of a proximate threat from another aircraft, and

b2) means for energizing said audible tone for either continuous or a limited period of operation.

56. The apparatus as recited in claim 55 where said reply detecting means further comprises:

b3) muting means responsive to operation of an operator input for muting said source of an audible tone for a predetermined time, and

b4) first programmable means for selecting said predetermined time.

57. The apparatus as recited in claim 56 where said reply detecting means further comprises:

b5) second programmable means for selecting continuous or limited period of operation of said source of said audible tone, wherein said second programmable means includes means for selecting continuous or limited period of operation of said source of said audible tone for each of a plurality of different flight regimes.

58. The apparatus as recited in claim 52 wherein said reply detecting means further comprises:

b1) a source of an audible tone for generating a tone in response to detection of a proximate threat from another aircraft; and

b2) means responsive to an operator input for muting said source of an audible tone until detection of a predetermined change in host altitude.

59. In a proximity warning system for host aircraft including a transponder and a reply detector and based on evaluation of replies from transponders of other aircraft, a reply detector and altimeter check comprising:

a) buffer means responsive to pressure altitude measurement for reporting own aircraft altitude,

b) reply detecting means responsive to transponder replies from other aircraft for displaying information on proximate threats based on own aircraft altitude as determined from said buffer means,

c) recording means responsive to engaging a barometric correction function for recording local barometric pressure, and

d) altitude display means responsive to said reporting means and to said recording means for compensating the own aircraft altitude from said buffer means in accordance with said local barometric pressure from said recording means to display, local barometric pressure corrected, own aircraft altitude.

60. The apparatus as recited in claim 59 which further includes:

e) threat display means for displaying pressure corrected threat altitude based on replies detected by said reply detecting means and local barometric pressure from said recording means.

61. In a proximity warning system for host aircraft including a transponder and a reply detector and based on evaluation of replies from transponders of other aircraft, a reply detector and density altitude computer comprising:

a) buffer means responsive to pressure altitude measurement for reporting own aircraft altitude,

b) reply detecting means responsive to transponder replies from other aircraft for displaying information on proximate threats based on own aircraft altitude as determined from said buffer means,

c) recording means responsive to engaging a density altitude function for recording local ambient temperature, and

d) density altitude display means responsive to said buffer means and to said recording means for compensating the own aircraft altitude from said buffer means in accordance with said local ambient temperature from said recording means to display, local temperature corrected, own aircraft density altitude.

62. A method of validating a transponder reply in a proximity warning system comprising the steps of:

a) identifying F1 and F2 reply pulses;

b) determining if said pulses differ in amplitude by more than a given amount;

rejecting said reply if they do, otherwise accepting said pulses;

c) averaging amplitudes of said F1 and F2 pulses to determine a midpoint;

d) identifying a pulse received between said F1 and F2 pulses in time and closest to a current midpoint;

terminating said validation if no pulse is identified;

e) rejecting a pulse identified in step d) and terminating the validation if the identified pulse has an amplitude differing by more than a specified amount from said current midpoint, otherwise accepting said pulse;

f) determining a new midpoint if the pulse identified in step d) has an amplitude which is greater or less than the amplitudes of the largest or smallest pulse which has been accepted; and

g) repeating steps d), e), and f) until said validation is terminated.

63. A method as recited in claim 62 which includes the further, preparatory steps of:

i) sampling received energy and digitizing an output from the sampling,

ii) averaging each digitized sample with a predetermined number of adjacent samples and storing said averaged samples, and

iii) validating pulses from those ones of the stored averaged samples which have time durations meeting predetermined criteria.

64. A method as recited in claim 63 which includes the further preparatory step of:

iv) comparing a sequence of pulses from step iii) with a predetermined sequence criterion and discarding those pulse sequences which do not meet the predetermined sequence criterion.

65. A method as recited in claim 62 wherein said step (c) further includes:

c1) comparing the average amplitude determined in step (c) against a threshold amplitude and rejecting said reply if said average is less than the threshold amplitude.