Process for dynamically equalizing multichannel optical imaging systems

• US 5,081,597 A
• Filed: 12/21/1989
• Issued: 01/14/1992
• Est. Priority Date: 12/21/1989
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Xerox Corporation (Xerox Holdings Corp.)
• Original Assignee: Xerox Corporation (Xerox Holdings Corp.)
• Inventors: Kowalski, Robert P.
• Primary Examiner(s): Black, Thomas G.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Ramirez, Ellis B.
• Application Number:
  US07/454,349
• Time in Patent Office: 754 Days
• Field of Search: 364/525, 364/572, 364/574, 364/581, 364/571.02, 364/571.04, 346/160, 356/356, 382/53, 382/65, 350/356, 350/96.25
• US Class Current: 702/85
• CPC Class Codes: G06K 15/027 Test patterns and calibration arrangements for controlling or analysing printing mechanisms of typewriters or selective printing units B41J29/393 takes precedence; colour correction using test pattern analysis in general H04N1/6033
• CPC Class Codes: G06K 15/12 by photographic printing , e.g. by laser printers
• CPC Class Codes: G06K 15/1247 using an array of light sources, e.g. a linear array
• CPC Class Codes: G06K 15/1261 using an array of light sources
• CPC Class Codes: G06K 15/1271 by light beam splitting
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 1/4015 of the reproducing head

Abstract

In accordance with the present invention, correction factors for dynamically equalizing the optical channels of a multichannel optical imaging system, individually or on a group-by-group basis, are recursively computed while the imaging system is idle (i.e., not printing) through the use of an iterative process comprising the steps of: measuring the output intensities of the respective sets of channels, sequentially comparing the measured channel intensities against a system calibrated reference intensity level, and adjusting the correction factor for each set of channels that is found to be operating at an intensity level deviating from the reference intensity level in the direction that is required to reduce the magnitude of the deviation (unless the correction factor value already is at the limit of its dynamic range in that direction). Preferably, the correction factor adjustments are made by incrementing and decrementing their least significant values, thereby maximizing the sensitivity of each iteration of the process to the affect of the immediately preceding iteration on the amount of crosstalk occurring between neighboring sets of channels. For example, the correction factors suitably are multi-bit binary values which are adjusted by incrementing and decrementing their least significant bits (LSB'"'"'s). The reference intensity level typically is calibrated by measuring the uncorrected output intensities of the respective sets of channels and by then selecting the intensity of the set of channels which is determined to be operating at the lowest valid intensity level for use as the reference intensity. Advantageously, this calibration procedure is repeated on a predetermined schedule for recalibrating the reference level from time-to-time to correct for gradual drift in the optical characteristics of the imaging system.

Claims

1. A process for equalizing an optical imaging system having a plurality of parallel channels, said method comprising the steps of

recursively measuring the output intensities of said channels before and after corrective equalization factors are applied to them to provide pre-correction and post-correction intensity measurements;

said measurements being performed at a resolution of n channels/measurement, where n=1, 2, . . . N/2, and N=the number of channels contained by said imaging system;

averaging said pre-correction intensity measurements to establish a threshold at a preselected percentage of said average;

selecting one of said pre-correction intensity measurements to establish a reference level, said one intensity measurement being equal to or exceeding said threshold by an amount no greater than any of said other pre-correction intensity measurements;

applying separate corrective equalization factors to each set of n channels to equalize said channels on a set-by-set basis;

iteratively adjusting the correction factors for all equalizable sets of channels based on their output intensity relative to said reference level, whereby the output intensities of the respective equalizable sets of channels are brought into balance with said reference level, even in the presence of a significant level of optical crosstalk between neighboring sets of channels.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein

said adjustments are made to least significant values of said corrective factors to provide enhanced sensitivity to variations in said crosstalk level.

3. The process of claim 2 wherein

said corrective factors are multi-bit binary values having least significant bits which are adjusted to equalize said imaging system to said reference level.

4. The process of claim 1 wherein

said reference level is recalibrated from time-to-time by operating said imaging system with all of said corrective factors set to null values to remeasure the pre-corrected output intensities of the respective sets of channels, and by then repeating said averaging and selecting steps to provide a recalibrated reference level for said imaging system.