Speed sensor fault detection system and method

• US 5,095,269 A
• Filed: 05/25/1990
• Issued: 03/10/1992
• Est. Priority Date: 05/25/1990
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Eaton Corp. (Wisconsin) (Eaton Corporation PLC.)
• Original Assignee: Eaton Corp. (Wisconsin) (Eaton Corporation PLC.)
• Inventors: McNinch, Joseph H. Jr.
• Primary Examiner(s): Wieder, Kenneth A.
• Assistant Examiner(s): EDMONDS, WARREN
• Application Number:
  US07/528,521
• Time in Patent Office: 655 Days
• Field of Search: 324/160, 324/161, 324/166, 324/173, 324/174, 324/185, 324/207.25, 324/239, 303/6.01, 303/21, 303/94, 303/106, 310/155, 310/108
• US Class Current: 324/166
• CPC Class Codes: G01P 3/489 Digital circuits therefor

Abstract

The control method/system for sensing "tooth or pulse drop-out" type faults in the output signals from a rotational speed sensor assembly (10) of the type utilizing a rotor (12) and a relatively fixed sensor (16) to provide an output comprising a plurality of pulses having a frequency indicative of the rotational speed of the rotor is provided.

Claims

1. A method for detecting and reacting to "dropped pulse type" faults in the output signals from speed sensor assemblies (10) in a control system including a control unit (ECU) for processing input signals according to either a non-fault sensed set of predetermined logic rules and a separate fault sensed (fail safe, fail soft) set of predetermined logic rules and a speed sensor assembly of the type comprising a rotor (12) rotatably associated with the monitored rotatable member (14) and a relatively fixed sensor member (16), said sensor assembly providing an output signal (20, 22, 24, 26) comprising a plurality of pulses having a frequency indicative of the rotational speed (S) of said rotor, the rotational speed determined as a function of the number (N) of said pulses over a period of time, said method characterized by:

selecting the period of time such that if the actual value of (N-1) is sensed as equalizing (N-2) or less, then a determined absolute value of the rate of change in S will be greater than a reference value equal to at least a largest expected deceleration rate of the monitored object;

determining a value indicative of the rate of change with respect to time in S;

comparing the absolute value of said value indicative of in the rate of change in S to said reference value (REF); and

if the absolute value of the value indicative of the rate of change of S is greater than said reference value, causing said control unit to process input signals according to said fault sensed set of predetermined logic rules.

2. The control method of claim 1 wherein said absolute value of the rate of change in S is determined by a comparison of the current calculated value for S and the last calculated value for S.

3. The control method of claim 1 wherein the calculated value for the rate of change in S is the first derivative of the value of S with respect to time.

4. The control method of claims 1, 2 or 3 wherein said function is defined by the relationship S is a function of (N-1)K/(C_N -C₀) where S=rotational speed of the monitored object;

N=number of pulse counts per fixed time duration cycle loop;

K=a constant;

C_N =time of last N count; and

C₀ =time of first N count.

5. A control system for detecting and responding to "dropped tooth type" faults in the output signals from tooth rotor type speed sensor assemblies, said control system including a control unit (ECU) for processing input signals according to either a non-fault sensed set of predetermined logic rules and a separate fault sensed (fail safe, fail soft) set of predetermined logic rules and a speed sensor assembly (10) of the type comprising a tooth rotor (12) rotatably associated with the monitored rotatable member (14) and a relatively fixed sensor member (16), said sensor assembly providing an output signal (20, 22, 24, 26) comprising a plurality of pulses having a frequency indicative of the rotational speed of said rotor, the rotational speed determined as a function of the number (N) of said tooth pulses sensed in a time period, said system characterized by:

means for setting the time period such that if the actual value of (N-1) is sensed as equaling (N-2) or less, then a determined absolute value of the rate of change in S will be greater than a reference value equal to at least a largest expected deceleration rate of the monitored object;

means for determining a value indicative of the rate of change with respect to time in S;

means for comparing the absolute value of said value indicative of the rate of change in S to said reference value (REF) and if the absolute value of the value indicative of the rate of change of S is greater than said reference value, causing said control unit to process said input signals according to said fault sensed set of predetermined logic rules.

6. The control system of claim 5 wherein the calculated value for the rate of change in S is the first derivative of the value of S with respect to time.

7. The control system of claims 5, or 6 wherein said function is defined by the relationship S is a function of (N-1)K/(C_N -C₀) where S=rotational speed of the monitored object;

N=number of tooth pulse counts per fixed time duration cycle loop;

K=a constant;

C_N =time of last N count; and

C₀ =time of first N count.