Antenna pattern selection for optimized communications

• US 5,117,236 A
• Filed: 10/19/1990
• Issued: 05/26/1992
• Est. Priority Date: 10/19/1990
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Motorola, Inc. (Motorola Solutions, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Motorola, Inc. (Motorola Solutions, Inc.)
• Inventors: Buchholz, Dale R., Nolan, Michael P., Doss, William K., Chang, Hungkun J.
• Primary Examiner(s): Issing, Gregory C.
• Application Number:
  US07/601,476
• Time in Patent Office: 585 Days
• Field of Search: 342/367, 342/374, 455/133, 455/134, 455/135, 455/25, 455/31, 455/33
• US Class Current: 342/367
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 7/088 using beam selection
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 16/24 Cell structures

Abstract

An antenna selection technique is used in an RF communication system in which user modules (UM) communicate with at least one node. The UM'"'"'s and nodes each have multiple antennae. The combination of each UM and node antenna is evaluated at the UM. Based on both signal quality and strength, the UM selects its antenna and the best node antenna for use.

Claims

1. A remote communications device capable of RF communication with a node comprising:

means coupled to said remote device for selecting an antenna pattern from a plurality of directional antenna patterns that cover different geographic areas relative to the remote device;

means for determining the quality (^Q) of signals received from the node on each of said antenna patterns;

means for determining the signal strength of (S) of signals received from the node on each of said antenna patterns;

means for ranking each of said antenna patterns according to R=(q*^Q)+(s*S), where R is the rank, q and s are numerical weighting factors, wherein q>

0 and s>

0 and q>

10*S, whereby the quality of the received signal is given greater weight than the signal strength; and

means for generating a historical average rank for each of said antenna patterns according to HRnew=(k*HRold)+((1-k)*R), where HRnew is the new historical average rank, HRold is the last calculated historical rank, and R is the rank for the antenna pattern, and 1>

k>

0;

said selecting means selecting the antenna pattern for use in communicating with the node based upon said historical average rankings.

2. The remote device according to claim 1 wherein k>

0.5 thereby giving greater weight to the historical ranking and reducing the impact of each new ranking.

3. The remote device according to claim 1 wherein k>

0.9 thereby giving greater weight to the historical ranking and reducing the impact of each new ranking.

4. The remote device according to claim 1 further comprising means for periodically generating new rankings R based on new determinations of quality (Q) and strength (S).

5. A radio frequency (RF) communications system including a node and at least one remote device capable of RF communication with the node comprising:

means coupled to the remote device (RM) for selecting an RM antenna pattern from a plurality of directional antenna patterns that cover different geographic areas relative to the RM;

means coupled to the node for selecting a node antenna pattern from a plurality of directional antenna patterns that cover different geographic areas relative to the node;

means for generating a matrix of rankings of each remote device antenna pattern for each node antenna pattern based on signals communicated between the remote device and node, said rankings of remote device and node antenna patterns constituting rows and columns, respectively, in said matrix;

means for summing the rankings in each column in said matrix to generate column summations;

said node antenna pattern selecting means selecting the node antenna pattern corresponding to the larges column summation for use in communications with said remote device.

6. The system according to claim 5 wherein said means for generating a matrix of rankings includes:

means for determining the quality (Q) of signals received from each node antenna pattern on each of said device antenna patterns;

means for determining the strength (S) of the signals received from each node antenna pattern on each of said device antenna patterns;

means for ranking each combination of antenna patterns according to

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">R=(q*Q)+(s*S)

where R is the rank, q and s are numerical weighting factors.

7. The system according to claim 6 further comprising means for generating a historical average rank for each of said antenna patterns according to HR_new =(k*HR_old)+((1-k)*R), where HR_new is the new historical average rank, HR_old is the last calculated historical rank, and R is the rank for an antenna pattern, and 1>

k>

0, said device selecting means selecting the antenna pattern for use in communicating with the node based on said historical average rank.

8. The system according to claim 6 wherein q>

0 and s>

0, and q>

10*s, whereby the quality of the received signal is given substantially greater weight than the strength of the signal.

9. The system according to claim 7 wherein k>

0.5 thereby giving greater weight to the historical ranking and reducing the impact of each new ranking.

10. The system according to claim 7 wherein k>

0.9 thereby giving greater weight to the historical ranking and reducing the impact of each new ranking.

11. The system according to claim 6 further comprising means for periodically generating new rankings R based on new determinations of quality (Q) and strength (S) for each matrix combination.

12. The system according to claim 5 further comprising said generating means and summing means both being part of said remote device, and means associated with said remote device means for transmitting a command to the node defining the node antenna pattern to use for communications with the remote device.

13. A method for choosing one antenna pattern from among a plurality of antenna patterns coupled to a remote communications device capable of RF communication with a node comprising:

selecting an antenna pattern from a plurality of directional antenna patterns that cover different geographic areas relative to the remote device;

determining the quality (^Q) of the signals received from the node on each of said antenna patterns;

determining the signal strength (S) of the signals received from the node on each of said antenna patterns;

ranking each of said antenna patterns according to R=(q*^Q)+(s*S), where R is the rank, q and s are numerical weighting factors, wherein q>

0 and s>

0 and q>

10*S, whereby the quality of the received signal is given greater weight than the signal strength;

generating a historical average rank for each of said antenna patterns according to HRnew=(k*HRold)+((1-k)*R), where HRnew is the new historical average rank, HRold is the last calculated historical rank, and R is the rank for the antenna pattern, and k is a weighting factor where 1>

k>

0; and

selecting the antenna pattern for use in communicating with the node based on the highest historical average rankings.

14. The method according to claim 13 wherein k>

0.5 thereby giving greater weight to the historical ranking and reducing the impact of each new ranking.