Directional antenna arrangement method for simulcast broadcasting

• US 5,117,503 A
• Filed: 10/02/1989
• Issued: 05/26/1992
• Est. Priority Date: 10/02/1989
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Motorola, Inc. (Motorola Solutions, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Motorola, Inc. (Motorola Solutions, Inc.)
• Inventors: Olson, Carl B.
• Primary Examiner(s): Eisenzopf, Reinhard J.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Pham, Chi H.
• Application Number:
  US07/415,799
• Time in Patent Office: 967 Days
• Field of Search: 455/50-52, 455/56, 455/55, 455/33, 455/67, 371/5.4, 375/107, 342/359, 342/360, 342/423, 342/432
• US Class Current: 455/502
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 21/29 Combinations of different interacting antenna units for giving a desired directional characteristic H01Q25/00 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 3/2682 Time delay steered arrays

Abstract

A method of configuring directional antennas to more fully radiate a geographic region serviced by a simulcast radio system can reduce the number of omni-directional antennas used by prior art methods. Directional antennas having significant differences between frontal and rearward radiated signal levels are used to provide large signal amplitude differences when signal phase differences in the simulcast coverage area become appreciable.

Claims

1. In a simulcast antenna system covering a geographic area having at least a first and second transmission site and source site for sourcing a digital information signal, a method of improving reception coherence, comprising the steps of:

A) determining an equal signal level point of transmissions from the first and second transmission site;

B) adjusting at least one of the transmissions from the first and second transmission sites to cause a transmission of the information signal from the first transmission site to arrive at the equal signal level point at substantially the same time as a transmission of the information signal from the second transmission site;

C) comparing transmissions from the first transmission site with transmissions from the second transmission site at various points within the geographic area, to thereby measure at least one reception parameter;

D) selecting a signal radiation pattern for at least one of the first and second transmission sites to optimize the at least one reception parameter.

2. The method of claim 1 where said at least one reception parameter is an empirically determined required relationship between relative signal strengths and signal arrival times at various points to insure that the digital information signal, after reception by a receiver in said geographic region, has a maximum allowable bit error rate.

3. The method of claim 2 including the step of adding a transmission site within said geographic region to meet said empirically determined required relationship.

4. The method of claim 3 including the step of relocating a transmission site within said geographic region to meet said empirically determined required relationship.

5. The method of claim 3 further comprising the step of selecting a directional radiation pattern for said transmission sites.

6. The method of claim 5 where the step of selecting a directional radiation pattern for said transmission sites includes the step of selecting the horizontal and vertical half-power beam widths of said transmission sites.

7. The method of claim 5 where the step of selecting a directional radiation pattern for said transmission sites includes the step of selecting the ratio of the forward power gain to the reverse power gain of the antennas.

8. The method of claim 5 where the step of selecting a directional radiation pattern for said transmission sites includes the step of selecting the electrical down-tilt of the antennas.

9. The method of claim 5 where the step of selecting a directional radiation pattern includes the step of selecting the mechanical down-tilt of the antennas.