Modeling a factory with human operators and validating the model

• US 5,140,537 A
• Filed: 05/21/1990
• Issued: 08/18/1992
• Est. Priority Date: 05/21/1990
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Company (HP Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Company (HP Inc.)
• Inventors: Tullis, Barclay J.
• Primary Examiner(s): Lall, Parshotam S.
• Assistant Examiner(s): ZANELLI, MICHAEL J
• Application Number:
  US07/526,352
• Time in Patent Office: 820 Days
• Field of Search: 364/148-151, 364/513, 364/578, 364/468, 364/469, 364/200, 364/900, 364/401, 364/402, 364/478, 364/400
• US Class Current: 703/6
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 19/41885 characterised by modeling, simulation of the manufacturing system
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/063112 Skill-based matching of a person or a group to a task
• CPC Class Codes: Y02P 90/02 Total factory control, e.g. smart factories, flexible manufacturing systems [FMS] or integrated manufacturing systems [IMS]
• CPC Class Codes: Y02P 90/80 Management or planning

Abstract

A method of simulating a factory. Characteristics such as job skills of people in the factory are modeled along with characteristics of machines in the factory. Chicken charts and time-state charts are used to validate and verify the model.

Claims

1. A method of simulating a factory, the method comprising:

representing a plurality of machines in a factory by modeling various characteristics of different ones of the machines;

representing a plurality of people in the factory by modeling skills that re required to operate the machines, different ones of the people having different ones of the skills, each skill being possessed by at lest one of the people;

modeling characteristics of an interaction between one of the people and one of the machines; and

using the model in a computer system to generate simulation data indicative of operation of the factory.

2. A method according to claim 1 wherewith generated data are depicted in the form of a chicken chart.

3. A method according to claim 1 wherein the generated data are depicted in the form of a time-state bar chart.

4. A method according to claim 1 and further comprising verifying and validating the model by comparing the simulation data generated by the model with data compiled from the actual factory being model.

5. A method according to claim 1 wherein representing a plurality of people comprises representing the quantity of people who are available at a given time.

6. A method according to claim 5 wherein representing the quantity of people comprises representing the quantities of people having each of a plurality of skills.

7. a method according to claim 1 wherein generating simulation data comprises testing alternative sets of rules for assigning various ones of the people to operate various ones of the machines according to which of the people posses which of the skills.

8. A method according to claim 7 wherein one of the rules comprises a requirement that each person work approximately the same amount of time as each other person during a shift.

9. A method according to claim 7 wherein one of the rules comprises a requirement that people be assigned to machines having higher utilization rates before being assigned to other machines.

10. A method according to claim 1 wherein modeling characteristics of an interaction comprises estimating the amount of item required for one of the people to identify a need for a decision and the time required for the decision to be made.

11. A method according to claim 10 wherein estimating the time required for making the decision comprises identifying a skill required to make the decision and determining the availability of one o the people having said skill.

12. A method according to claim 1 wherein modeling characteristics of an interaction comprises modeling an interaction between one of the people and a state of the factory.

13. A method according to claim 1 wherein modeling skills comprises ranking the skills possessed by various ones o the people and using the rankings to dynamically determine which activities each of the people will perform.

14. A method according t claim 1 wherein representing a plurality of people compresses keeping a record of utilization o various ones of the people as a function of time.

15. A method according to claim 14 wherein keeping a record of utilization comprises keeping a record of how much time each of the people has remaining on a current shift.