Aircraft traffic alert and collision avoidance device

• US 5,157,615 A
• Filed: 12/31/1991
• Issued: 10/20/1992
• Est. Priority Date: 01/09/1990
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Ryan International Corp. (Avidyne Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Ryan International Corp. (Avidyne Corporation)
• Inventors: Ryan, Dean E., Brodegard, William C., Ryan, Paul A.
• Primary Examiner(s): Black, Thomas G.
• Application Number:
  US07/815,489
• Time in Patent Office: 294 Days
• Field of Search: 364/461, 364/516, 364/554, 364/439, 364/443, 342/455, 342/29-32
• US Class Current: 701/301
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/74 Systems using reradiation of radio waves, e.g. secondary radar systems; Analogous systems
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/767 Responders; Transponders teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using reflecting targets or active targets F41G3/26
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/933 of aircraft or spacecraft

Abstract

A passive aircraft Traffic alert and Collision Avoidance Device (TCAD) is based on sensing and responding to transponder replies of other aircraft to SSR interrogations. In order to avoid masking other aircraft replies by the host transponder TCAD repeatedly and randomly suppresses the host transponder and simultaneoulsly listens for other aircraft replies. Suppression on each occasion is effective for an equal and predetermined duration which is much longer than a typical replay, in a preferred embodiment the suppression/listen duration is 725 μs. In this embodiment the time between successive suppression/listen occasions is random between 725 μs. and 5.025 ms. with an average value of about 2.9 ms. Digital signal processing is used to detect and discard garbled or overlapping replies. Each valid reply, exhibiting a minimum pulse amplitude, is decoded and correlated with a calibrated range parameter and given a time tag. Successive replies which match to within predetermined criteria in time and calibrated range are merged to track the positional relation between the host and other aircraft. The positional relation between other aircraft and the host are evaluated via a priority table in terms of relative altitude and range to locate that craft which poses the highest threat to the host. Parameters of such a craft are displayed. In the event a craft penetrates a shield of programmable size an audible alert is sounded. TCAD provides for shields for each of a plurality of flight regimes, such as terminal, standard and enroute.

Claims

1. In a proximity warning system based solely on receipt, at an own aircraft, of replies by transponders of other aircraft and own aircraft altitude, a method of selectively displaying data to an operator comprising the steps of:

a) establishing a threat prioritization table containing a numeric threat value based on distance and altitude separations between own and other aircraft,

b) establishing a list of other aircraft, each aircraft on said list associated with parameters including altitude and distance separation, said parameters based on replies of transponders of said other aircraft,

c) determining from the threat prioritization table a numeric threat value for the other aircraft on the list,

d) driving a display with data selected from the list in an order determined from the numeric threat value.

2. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein said threat prioritization table is arranged to contain numeric threat values which increase with increasing separation between own aircraft and other aircraft.

3. A method as recited in claim 2 wherein said display is normally driven by data associated with that other aircraft having the lowest threat value and wherein the operator can command display of data associated with a different one of the other aircraft.

4. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein said step of establishing the thread prioritization table comprises the steps of:

a1) dividing airspace surrounding the host aircraft into several regions as a function of altitude and distance separation; and

a2) prioritizing each of said regions by assigning threat value ranges to each said region as a function of altitude and distance separation pairs contained within the ranges.

5. A method as recited in claim 4 which comprises the further step of providing thread values in each said region, for different distance and altitude separation pairs, so that each threat value is different from all other threat values.

6. A method as recited in claim 5 wherein threat values are assigned so that threat values increase with increasing separation.