Hierarchical process control system and method

• US 5,161,110 A
• Filed: 02/27/1990
• Issued: 11/03/1992
• Est. Priority Date: 02/27/1990
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Atlantic Richfield Company (BP PLC)
• Original Assignee: Atlantic Richfield Company (BP PLC)
• Inventors: Dorchak, Wayne A.
• Primary Examiner(s): Smith, Jerry
• Assistant Examiner(s): Gordon, Paul
• Application Number:
  US07/485,425
• Time in Patent Office: 980 Days
• Field of Search: 364/131, 364/139, 364/152, 364/153, 364/468, 364/550, 364/551.01, 364/276, 364/283.2, 364/921.8, 395/650, 395/10, 395/11, 395/52
• US Class Current: 700/108
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 19/4063 Monitoring general control system G05B19/4062 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 706/906 Process plant

Abstract

The present invention relates to a real-time hierarchical process control system. The system comprises a multiple-level architecture, each level including a monitor for receiving and monitoring a plurality of input signals. The monitor produces a first request if at least one input signal exceeds a predetermined range. A guardian receives the first request, issues a second request and determines a course of action to take. A consultant receives the second request, performs an analysis and produces information for aiding the determination of a course of action.

Claims

1. A real-time hierarchical process control system comprising:

a monitor for receiving and monitoring a plurality of input signals, said monitor producing a first request if at least one input signal exceeds a predetermined range;

a guardian for receiving said request and determining a course of action, said guardian producing a second request; and

a consultant for receiving said second request, performing an analysis and producing information for aiding said determination of a course of action.

2. The system, as set forth in claim 1, wherein said monitor produces a third request and said consultant receives said third request, performs an analysis and produces information for aiding said determination of a course of action.

3. The system, as set forth in claim 1, wherein said monitor is coupled to a subject, said plurality of input signals originating from said subject.

4. The system, as set forth in claim 1, wherein said monitor, guardian and consultant control a piece of equipment, said equipment being coupled to a plurality of sensors producing said plurality of input signals.

5. The system, as set forth in claim 4, wherein said monitor, guardian and consultant control a process, said process including the operation of a plurality of equipment, and said process monitor being coupled to said plurality of equipment monitors, said plurality of equipment monitors producing said plurality of input signals received by said process monitor.

6. The system, as set forth in claim 5, wherein said monitor, guardian and consultant control a facility, said facility including the operation of a plurality of processes, and said facility monitor being coupled to said plurality of process monitors, said plurality of process monitors producing said plurality of input signals received by said facility monitor.

7. The system, as set forth in claim 6, further comprising a knowledge base containing knowledge pertaining to one of an equipment, a specific process and a specific facility.

8. The system, as set forth in claim 7, wherein said guardian accesses knowledge stored in said knowledge base.

9. The system, as set forth in claim 7, wherein said consultant accesses knowledge stored in said database.

10. The system, as set forth in claim 6, further comprising a performance history database containing performance history pertaining to one of an equipment, a specific process and a specific facility.

11. The system, as set forth in claim 10, wherein said consultant accesses performance history stored in said performance history database.

12. The system, as set forth in claim 11, wherein said consultant performs analytic computations such as trend analysis, simulation, optimization and the like.

13. A real-time hierarchical process control method, comprising the steps of:

monitoring a first plurality of input signals originating from at least one first level subject, said first level subject being part of a second level subject;

monitoring a second plurality of input signals originating from said second level subject, said second level subject being part of a third level subject;

monitoring a third plurality of input signals originating from said third level subject;

recognizing a problem if one or more input signals from said first, second and third level subjects fail predetermined criteria;

diagnosing said recognized problem; and

advising a recommended course of action.

14. The method, as set forth in claim 13, wherein said diagnosing step comprises the steps of:

applying a set of pre-established rules;

accessing a database containing knowledge pertaining to one of said first, second and third level subjects.

15. The method, as set forth in claim 13, wherein said diagnosing step comprises the steps of:

accessing a database containing performance history pertaining to one of said first, second and third level subjects;

performing an analysis on said data.

16. A real-time hierarchical process control system comprising:

at least one first level controller for monitoring a first plurality of input signals received from a subject and for controlling said subject;

said first level controller including;

a monitor coupled to a plurality of sensors for receiving and monitoring said input signals from said sensors, said monitor producing a first request if at least one input signal fails a predetermined criteria; and

a guardian for receiving said first request and determining a course of action;

at least one second level controller coupled to at least one first level controller for monitoring a second plurality of input signals received therefrom and controlling said first level controller; and

a third level controller coupled to at least one second level controller for monitoring a third plurality of input signals received therefrom and controlling said second level controller.

17. The system, as set forth in claim 16, wherein said second level controller comprises:

a monitor coupled to a plurality of sensors for receiving and monitoring said input signals from said sensors, said monitor producing a first request if at least one input signal fails a predetermined criteria; and

a guardian for receiving said first request and determining a course of action.

18. The system, as set forth in claim 17, further comprising a consultant, said guardian producing a second request, and said consultant for receiving said second request, performing an analysis and producing information for aiding said determination of a course of action.

19. The system, as set forth in claim 18, wherein said monitor produces a third request and said consultant receives said third request, performing an analysis and producing information for aiding said determination of a course of action.

20. The system, as set forth in claim 16, wherein said third level controller comprises:

a monitor coupled to a plurality of sensors for receiving and monitoring said input signals from said sensors, said monitor producing a first request if at least one input signal fails a predetermined criteria; and

a guardian for receiving said first request and determining a course of action.

21. The system, as set forth in claim 20, further comprising a consultant, said guardian producing a second request, and said consultant for receiving said second request, performing an analysis and producing information for aiding said determination of a course of action.

22. The system, as set forth in claim 21, wherein said monitor produces a third request and said consultant receives said third request, performing an analysis and producing information for aiding said determination of a course of action.

23. The system, as set forth in claim 16, further comprising at least one sub-level controller coupled to a second level controller for monitoring and controlling at least one first level controller.

24. The system, as set forth in claim 23, wherein said sub-level controller comprises:

a monitor coupled to a plurality of sensors for receiving and monitoring said input signals from said sensors, said monitor producing a first request if at least one input signal fails a predetermined criteria; and

a guardian for receiving said first request and determining a course of action.

25. The system, as set forth in claim 24, further comprising a consultant, said guardian producing a second request, and said consultant receiving said second request, performing an analysis and producing information for aiding said determination of a course of action.

26. The system, as set forth in claim 25, wherein said monitor produces a third request, said consultant receives said third request, performs an analysis and produces information for aiding said determination of a course of action.

27. The system, as set forth in claim 16, wherein said subject of said first level controller is a piece of equipment, said equipment being a part of a process, said second level controller controls and monitors said process, said process being part of a facility, and said third level controller controls and monitors said facility.

28. The system, as set forth in claim 27, further comprising a knowledge database coupled to each of said first, second and third level controllers containing knowledge pertaining to said equipment, process and facility, respectively.

29. The system, as set forth in claim 28, wherein each said first, second, and third level controller comprises:

a monitor coupled to a plurality of sensors for receiving and monitoring said input signals from said sensors, said monitor producing a first request if at least one input signal fails a predetermined criteria; and

a guardian for receiving said first request and determining a course of action, and said guardian makes inferences by accessing knowledge stored in said knowledge database.

30. The system, as set forth in claim 29, further comprising a performance history database coupled to each of said first, second and third level controllers containing performance history pertaining to said equipment, process and facility, respectively.

31. The system, as set forth in claim 30, wherein each said first, second, and third level controllers comprises a consultant, said guardian producing a second request, said consultant receiving said second request, performing an analysis, makes inferences by accessing performance history stored in said performance history database, and producing information for aiding said determination of a course of action.

32. The system, as set forth in claim 31, wherein said consultant performs analytic computations such as trend analysis, simulation, optimization and the like to predict probable future problems.

33. The system, as set forth in claim 16, further comprising a consultant, said guardian producing a second request, and said consultant for receiving said second request, performing an analysis and producing information for aiding said determination of a course of action.

34. The system, as set forth in claim 33, wherein said monitor produces a third request and said consultant receives said third request, performing an analysis and producing information for aiding said determination of a course of action.