Method of operating a transport refrigeration system

• US 5,161,384 A
• Filed: 02/10/1992
• Issued: 11/10/1992
• Est. Priority Date: 02/10/1992
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Thermo King Corporation (Trane Technologies plc)
• Original Assignee: Thermo King Corporation (Trane Technologies plc)
• Inventors: Hanson, Jay L., Spear, Norman F., Naley, Lowell B.
• Primary Examiner(s): Tanner, Harry B.
• Application Number:
  US07/833,230
• Time in Patent Office: 274 Days
• Field of Search: 62/125, 62/126, 62/127, 62/128, 62/129, 62/130, 62/158, 62/160, 62/203, 62/208, 62/209, 165/11.1, 236/94, 340/584, 340/585, 340/588
• US Class Current: 62/126
• CPC Class Codes: B60H 1/00978 Control systems or circuits characterised by failure of detection or safety means; Diagnostic methods
• CPC Class Codes: B60H 1/3232 particularly adapted for load transporting vehicles B60H1/3226 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: F25D 2700/14 Sensors measuring the temperature outside the refrigerator or freezer
• CPC Class Codes: F25D 29/003 for movable devices

Abstract

A method of monitoring a transport refrigeration system which is effective regardless of the temperature of a served space relative to a selected set point temperature. Different "windows" of acceptable and marginal performance are provided in the form of different minimum magnitudes of ΔT, i.e., the algebraic difference between the return and discharge air temperatures, as a function of ambient and return air temperatures. The transport refrigeration system is thus monitored at all times, during both cooling and hot gas heating modes, and also including during initial temperature pull down of the cargo space, enabling an early warning to be generated for a marginal performance, and an early shut down to be initiated for unacceptable performance. In a preferred embodiment, a maximum value of ΔT is also provided, which, if exceeded by the actual ΔT, indicates a restricted air flow in the cargo space.

Claims

1. A method of monitoring a transport refrigeration system which conditions air returned from a cargo space via commanded cooling and heating modes, as required to hold a predetermined set point temperature, and discharges the conditioned air back into the cargo space, with the system having sensors for monitoring the temperatures of the return air, discharge air, and ambient air, characterized by the steps of:

providing an algebraic difference Δ

T between the temperatures of the return air and the discharge air,

selecting parameters for comparison with Δ

T as a function of the ambient temperature and the return air temperature,

and comparing Δ

T with the selected parameters to detect a malfunction in the operation of the transport refrigeration system, regardless of temperature of the return air relative to the selected set point temperature.

2. The method of claim 1 including the step of checking the temperature sensors for failure as a condition precedent to providing the algebraic difference Δ

T.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of selecting parameters selects minimum values of Δ

T which must be met by the comparison step to enable continued operation of the transport refrigeration system.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the parameters include normal, warning and shutdown values of Δ

T, with the step of selecting parameters reducing the magnitudes of the normal, warning and shutdown values of Δ

T in predetermined steps as the temperature of the return air is reduced.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of selecting parameters selects values for both cooling and heating modes, with the method including the steps of:

determining the commanded mode,

and using the selected parameters associated with the commanded mode in the comparison step.

6. The method of claim 1 including the steps of:

determining the commanded mode,

comparing the algebraic sign of Δ

T with the commanded mode to determine if the actual mode is consistent with the commanded mode,

providing a predetermined time delay when the comparison step finds the actual and commanded modes are not consistent,

and shutting the transport refrigeration system down if the actual mode is still inconsistent with the commanded mode at the end of the time delay.

7. The method of claim 1 including the steps of:

determining the commanded mode,

comparing the algebraic sign of Δ

T with the commanded mode to determine if the actual mode is consistent with the commanded mode,

checking the selected set point temperature to determine if it indicates a frozen load, when the comparison step finds the actual and commanded modes are not consistent,

providing a warning alarm when checking step finds the set point temperature is associated with a frozen load,

providing a predetermined time delay when the comparison step finds the actual and commanded modes are not consistent, and the checking step finds the set point temperature is not associated with a frozen load,

and shutting the transport refrigeration system down if the actual mode is still inconsistent with the commanded mode at the end of the time delay.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of selecting parameters selects minimum values which establish normal, marginal, and improper operation of the transport refrigeration system, and including the steps of:

providing a warning alarm signal when marginal operation is detected by the comparison step,

and identifying the nature of the marginal operation.

9. The method of claim 8 including the steps of:

providing a fault alarm signal when improper operation of the transport refrigeration system is detected,

identifying the nature of the improper operation,

and shutting the transport refrigeration system down.

10. The method of claim 1 including the step of:

providing a predetermined time delay before the step of providing the algebraic difference Δ

T, to prevent the use of temperature signals immediately after start-up of the transport refrigeration system.

11. The method of claim 1 including the steps of:

providing a first predetermined time delay before the step of providing the algebraic difference Δ

T, to prevent the use of temperature signals immediately after start-up of the transport refrigeration system,

determining the commanded mode,

comparing the algebraic sign of Δ

T with the commanded mode to determine if the actual mode is consistent with the commanded mode,

providing a second predetermined time delay, which is shorter than the first predetermined time delay, when the comparison step finds the actual and commanded modes are not consistent,

and shutting the transport refrigeration system down if the actual mode is still inconsistent with the commanded mode at the end of the second predetermined time delay.

12. The method of claim 11 including the steps of:

providing a third predetermined time delay when the actual mode is consistent with the commanded mode, and the comparison step detects a malfunction, with the length of the third predetermined time delay being a function of the commanded mode and the magnitude of difference between Δ

T and the applicable selected parameter.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein the third predetermined time delay is shorter than the first predetermined period of time when the commanded mode is heating and Δ

T does not exceed a first predetermined value.

14. The method of claim 13 including the step of shutting the transport refrigeration system down when Δ

T does not exceed the first predetermined value at the end of the third predetermined period of time.

15. The method of claim 12 wherein the third predetermined time delay is longer than the first predetermined period of time when the commanded mode is heating and Δ

T exceeds a first predetermined value but does not exceed a second predetermined value.

16. The method of claim 15 including the step of providing a warning alarm when Δ

T does not exceed the second predetermined value at the end of the third predetermined time delay.

17. The method of claim 12 wherein the third predetermined time delay is longer than the first predetermined period of time when the commanded mode is cooling and Δ

T does not exceed a first predetermined value.

18. The method of claim 17 including the steps of:

comparing Δ

T with a second predetermined value, which is less than the first predetermined value, when Δ

T does not exceed the first predetermined value at the end of the third predetermined period of time,

providing a warning alarm signal when the comparison step finds Δ

T exceeds the smaller second predetermined value,

providing a fourth predetermined time delay, which is shorter than the third predetermined time delay when the comparison step finds Δ

T does not exceed the smaller second predetermined value,

and shutting the transport refrigeration system down when Δ

T does not exceed the smaller second predetermined value at the end of the fourth predetermined time delay.

19. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of selecting parameters provides different ranges of acceptable and marginal performance for different return air temperatures, and the step of comparing Δ

T with the selected parameters compares Δ

T with the parameters regardless of the associated range, whereby the transport refrigeration system is monitored during temperature pull down of the cargo space.

20. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of selecting parameters selects a maximum value, and including the steps of:

comparing Δ

T with said selected maximum value,

and providing an alarm signal which indicates restricted air flow when the comparison step finds that Δ

T exceeds said selected maximum value.

21. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of selecting parameters selects minimum values which must be met by the comparison step to enable continued operation of the transport refrigeration system, and a maximum value,

and including the steps of:

comparing Δ

T with said selected maximum value,

and providing an alarm signal which indicates restricted air flow when the comparison step finds that Δ

T exceeds said selected maximum value.