Various possible execution paths measurement and analysis system for evaluating before writing source codes the efficiency performance of software designs

• US 5,168,563 A
• Filed: 03/25/1992
• Issued: 12/01/1992
• Est. Priority Date: 03/29/1989
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Company (HP Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Hewlett-Packard Company (HP Inc.)
• Inventors: D'Angelo, Vincent, Shenoy, Anil K., Utz, Walter J. Jr.
• Primary Examiner(s): Anderson, Lawrence E.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Lim, Krisna
• Application Number:
  US07/859,290
• Time in Patent Office: 251 Days
• Field of Search: 364/200 MS File, 364/900 MS File, 364/488, 364/578, 371/19, 395/575, 395/800, 395/500
• US Class Current: 703/19
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/34 Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation ; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 11/3612 by runtime analysis performance monitoring G06F11/3466

Abstract

A software engineering tool is disclosed which enables the efficiency and performance of a program design to be evaluated prior to the time the program is written into code. Every possible path that can be followed in the implementation of the program is identified, and its length is measured. From this information, reports are generated which point out the longest paths in the program and sources of potential performance problems. In addition, weights which identify relative complexities or performance timings can be assigned to individual modules in the program, and form the basis of other reports which indicate timing performance. The user is provided with the opportunity to alter the weights assigned to modules, and thereby determine the effect which different weights have on the overall performance of the program.

Claims

1. In a computerized software design method that includes, prior to coding a program being designed, the steps of providing a pluralilty of modules for the program being designed, specifying a hierarchical relationship among the modules, and creating a computerized database that includes a description of each of the modules and of the hierarchical relationship, an improvement comprising, before writing the modules in source code, the computer implemented steps of:

(a) receiving into an electronic computer from a designer an identification of one of the modules as a starting point for a task to be performed by the program being designed;

(b) automatically computing in the electronic computer various possible flow paths through the hierarchical relationship that could be followed by the program in executing the task;

(c) automatically storing a description of the flow paths in a memory of the electronic computer;

(d) automatically computing in the electronic computer values indicative of computational efficiency of the flow paths through the hierarchical relationship;

(e) automatically storing the values in the memory of the electronic computer;

(f) automatically retrieving said descriptions of the flow paths and said values indicative of computational efficiency from the memory and providing them to the designer in a report;

(g) receiving into the electronic computer from the designer a change in the design of the program according to the information in the report; and

(h) repeating steps (a) through (g) as desired by the designer to assist the designer in reducing any inefficiencies identified through said values indicative of computational efficiency.

2. An improvement as in claim 1 wherein step (d) comprises computing relative weighted predicted performance of each of the flow paths.

3. An improvement as in claim 1 wherein step (f) comprises selecting flow paths that include at least a predetermined number of the modules.

4. An improvement as in claim 1 wherein step (f) comprises selecting flow paths that include any of the modules that could be called by more than a predetermined number of others of the modules.

5. An improvement as in claim 1 wherein step (d) comprises receiving from the designer weighting factors for the modules and summing the weighting factors for those modules in the various flow paths, and step (f) comprises providing the sums of the weighting factors for the various flow paths.

6. An improvement as in claim 5 wherein step (f) comprises automatically building a spreadsheet in the computer and automatically displaying the spreadsheet to the designer and step (g) comprises receiving changed weighting factors.