Regulation of traffic load of fixed stations in a cellular radio communication network

• US 5,241,686 A
• Filed: 07/11/1991
• Issued: 08/31/1993
• Est. Priority Date: 07/12/1990
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Orange S.A.
• Original Assignee: Orange S.A.
• Inventors: Charbonnier, Alain
• Primary Examiner(s): Eisenzopf, Reinhard J.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Charouel, Lisa
• Application Number:
  US07/728,415
• Time in Patent Office: 782 Days
• Field of Search: 455/33.1, 455/33.2, 455/33.4, 455/53.1, 455/54.1, 455/54.2, 455/56.1, 455/63, 455/67.1, 379/58, 379/59, 379/60, 379/63
• US Class Current: 455/453
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 16/06 Hybrid resource partitioning, e.g. channel borrowing
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 28/02 Traffic management, e.g. flow control or congestion control
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 36/22 for handling the traffic
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 48/06 based on traffic conditions

Abstract

The process aims to constantly optimize the distribution of the radio-electric load on a radio communication cellular network between fixed relays. This is equivalent to increasing or reducing the surface of network cell when the traffic in the cell decreases or increases. Each relay transmits a field correction parameter as a function of a load indicator and fixed factors so that each mobile station corrects the radio electric field and selects the relay corresponding to the highest corrected field. The correction parameter of a relay in a given cell also depends on overload indicators relating to adjacent cells and indicators of field boundary displacements with respect to cells adjacent to the given cell.

Claims

1. A method of regulating traffic loads in fixed stations which are respectively included in and associated with cells in a cellular radio communication network where mobile stations measure radio-electric fields transmitted by said fixed stations,

said method comprising, relating to each of said fixed stations, the steps of:

computing a field correction parameter as a function of at least a load indicator of each of said fixed stations depending on the traffic supported by each of the fixed stations and periodically re-evaluated, and on fixed factors, and

transmitting said field correction parameter to said mobile stations, and, relating to each of said mobile stations, the step of;

correcting the measured radio-electric field corresponding to each of said fixed stations by said correction parameter into a corrected field, so that each of said mobile stations compares respective corrected fields corresponding to said fixed stations and selects the one of said fixed stations corresponding to the highest corrected field to establish a radio communication with the selected fixed station.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said load indicator of each of said fixed stations depends on a linear combination of elementary load indicators.

3. A method as claimed in claim 2, wherein said load indicator of each of said fixed stations is computed by averaging said linear combination during a predetermined period, then by undergoing recursive filtering.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein the elementary load indicators are the number of waiting radio channel requests in each of said fixed stations.

5. The method of claim 2 wherein the elementary load indicators are the number of busy radio channels in each of said fixed stations.

6. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said fixed factors are chosen from amongst a nominal load threshold, a loss factor, a hysteresis threshold and maximum and minimum value of said correction parameter.

7. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said field correction parameter of each of said fixed stations is regulated periodically between predetermined maximum and minimum values by a positive/negative increment which is determined by a comparison of a difference between said load indicator and said field correction parameter with a hysteresis threshold.

8. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein said difference further consists in subtracting a load threshold from said load indicator.

9. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein said correction parameter is multiplied by a loss factor in said difference.

10. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said field correction parameter of each of said fixed stations further depends on a periodically re-evaluated proximity load indicator which is a combination of:

an overload indicator relating to the fixed stations included in some of said cells which are adjacent to the cell associated with each of the fixed stations and

a boundary displacement indicator relating to field boundaries between said adjacent cells and said cell associated with each of the fixed stations,

a boundary between two cells of said adjacent cells being determined by an equality of the corrected fields corresponding to said two cells and being displaced as a function of variations in said correction parameter of said two cells.

11. A method as claimed in claim 10, wherein said overload indicator relating to the adjacent fixed stations depends on local overload indicators related respectively to the adjacent stations, the local overload indicator of each of said fixed stations being a function of said load indicator of each of the fixed stations when said correction parameter of each of the fixed stations is equal to a maximum value and being function of said correction parameter of each of the fixed stations and said proximity load indicator of each of the fixed stations when said correction parameter is lower than said maximum value.

12. A method as claimed in claim 11 wherein, when said correction parameter of each of said fixed stations is equal to said maximum value, said local overload indicator is equal to the difference between the load indicator and a sum of a nominal load threshold of each of said fixed stations and a hysteresis threshold that conditions a positive/negative incrementation of said field correction parameter.

13. A method as claimed in claim 11, wherein, when said correction parameter of each of said fixed stations is less than said maximum value, said local overload indicator is equal to a sum of said proximity load indicator and the product of said correction parameter by a loss factor.

14. A method as claimed in claim 11, wherein said local overload indicator is normalized in relation to a nominal load threshold of each of said fixed stations.

15. A method as claimed in claim 11, further including the step of comparing said overload indicator of each of said fixed stations with each of said local overload indicators of said adjacent cells thereby summing greatest indicators into said overload indicator.

16. A method as claimed in claim 11, wherein said boundary displacement indicator is equal to a sum of partial displacement indicators relating respectively to the field boundaries between said adjacent cells and said cell of each of said fixed stations, said partial displacement indicator of one of said adjacent cells being equal to the difference between said correction parameters of said adjacent cells and said cell of each of said fixed stations.

17. A method as claimed in claim 16, wherein said correction parameter difference is weighted by two factors, respectively when said difference is positive or negative.

18. A method as claimed in claim 7,

wherein said field correction parameter of each of said fixed stations depends on a periodically re-evaluated proximity load indicator which is a combination of:

an overload indicator relating to the fixed stations included in some of said cells which are adjacent to the cell associated with each of said fixed stations and

a boundary displacement indicator relating to field boundaries between said adjacent cells and said cell associated with each of said fixed stations,

a boundary between two cells of said adjacent cells being determined by an equality of the corrected fields corresponding to said two cells and being displaced as a function of variations in said correction parameters of said two cells, and

wherein said difference between said load indicator and said correction parameter further consists of subtracting said proximity load indicator from said load indicator.

19. A method as claimed in claim 10, wherein said proximity load indicator of each of said fixed stations is derived from a sum of said overload indicator and said boundary displacement indicator, from a product of said sum by a nominal load indicator of each of said fixed stations, and from an addition of said product and a threshold for said nominal load.

20. A method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the proximity load indicator computation is made in centralized facilities linked to the fixed stations of said cellular network.

21. A method as claimed in claim 11, wherein the computations of said correction parameter, load indicator and proximity load indicator for each of said fixed stations are made in centralized facilities linked to the fixed stations.

22. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the computation of said load correction parameter of each of said fixed stations is made locally in said fixed stations.