Evaporative purge monitoring strategy and system

• US 5,261,379 A
• Filed: 10/07/1991
• Issued: 11/16/1993
• Est. Priority Date: 10/07/1991
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Ford Global Technologies, LLC (Ford Motor Company)
• Original Assignee: Ford Motor Company
• Inventors: Marshall, Charles E., Lipinski, Daniel J., Prior, Ernest C.
• Primary Examiner(s): Cross, E. Rollins
• Assistant Examiner(s): MOULIS, THOMAS N
• Application Number:
  US07/772,304
• Time in Patent Office: 771 Days
• Field of Search: 123/520, 123/518, 123/519, 123/198 D
• US Class Current: 123/520
• CPC Class Codes: F02M 25/0809 Judging failure of purge control system

Abstract

This invention tests the mechanical integrity of an evaporative purge system and fuel system by applying a vacuum to a fuel tank and measuring the extent to which this vacuum bleeds down over a time period. Included in the test method are the steps of closing the vapor management valve positioned between the engine manifold and the evaporative purge flow path of the fuel tank; waiting a predetermined period of time; and obtaining an indication of the extent to which pressure is increasing in the fuel tank due to vapor generation.

Claims

1. A method of monitoring an evaporative purge flow path of a fuel system for a vehicle including sealing the evaporative flow path with respect to the atmosphere by the step of:

closing a vapor management valve positioned between an engine manifold vacuum and an evaporative purge flow path of a fuel tank;

waiting a predetermined period of time;

obtaining an indication of the extent to which pressure is increasing in the fuel tank due to vapor generation;

stopping further testing if the increase in pressure is above a predetermined maximum pressure value;

continuing with the test if the pressure increase is below the predetermined maximum pressure value, so that any pressure change by vapor generation is within an acceptable amount;

applying a vacuum to the evaporative purge flow path;

isolating the evaporative purge flow path from the atmosphere and the vacuum source and monitoring any change in vacuum; and

returning the evaporative purge flow path to a normal purge operation.

2. A method of monitoring an evaporative purge flow path as recited in claim 1 wherein the step of applying a vacuum includes:

closing a canister vent valve between the atmosphere and a canister and opening the vacuum manifold valve;

adjusting engine operation to accommodate consumption of fuel vapor from the evaporative purge flow path;

waiting a predetermined period of time;

if a predetermined target vacuum is not reached in a calibrated amount of time, stopping further testing and storing an error code indicating test failures; and

if a target vacuum is reached within the calibrated amount of time, closing the vacuum manifold valve.

3. A method of monitoring an evaporative purge flow path as recited in claim 1 wherein the steps of applying the vacuum and isolating the evaporative purge flow path include:

closing the vapor management valve and canister vent valve in order to hold the vacuum in the evaporative purge flow path;

waiting a predetermined period of time;

detecting a change in fuel tank vacuum;

comparing the change to a predetermined maximum acceptable pressure change;

passing the test if the pressure change is below the predetermined maximum acceptable pressure change; and

failing the test if the pressures change is above the predetermined maximum acceptable pressure change.

4. A method of monitoring an evaporative purge flow path including the steps of:

closing a vapor management valve positioned between an engine manifold vacuum and an evaporative purge flow path of a fuel tank, in order to obtain an indication of the extent to which pressure is increasing in the fuel tank due to vapor generation;

stopping further testing if the increase in pressure is above a calibrated maximum value;

continuing with the test if the pressure increase is below a calibrated maximum value, so that pressure during a vacuum bleed up period is not altered by vapor generation beyond a desired amount;

closing a canister vent valve to the atmosphere and opening the vapor management valve;

adjusting engine operation to accommodate consumption of fuel vapor from the evaporative purge flow path;

stopping further testing if a predetermined target vacuum is not reached within a calibrated amount of time and storing an error code indicating test failures;

if a target vacuum is reached within the calibrated amount of time, closing the vapor management valve;

closing the vapor management valve and the canister vent valve in order to hold the vacuum in the evaporative purge flow path;

waiting a predetermined period of time;

detecting a change in fuel tank vacuum;

comparing the change to a calibrated maximum acceptable pressure change;

passing the test if the pressure change is less than the maximum acceptable change;

failing the test if the pressures change is more than the maximum allowable pressure change; and

opening the canister vent valve at a calibrated ramp rate to the open flow position.