Multiplex transmission system for use in vehicles

• US 5,274,638 A
• Filed: 03/27/1991
• Issued: 12/28/1993
• Est. Priority Date: 03/30/1990
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Mazda Motor Corporation
• Original Assignee: Mazda Motor Corporation
• Inventors: Michihira, Osamu, Sone, Akira, Hideshima, Masao
• Primary Examiner(s): Olms, Douglas W.
• Assistant Examiner(s): HOM, SHICK C
• Application Number:
  US07/675,816
• Time in Patent Office: 1,007 Days
• Field of Search: 370/85.6, 370/85.3, 370/85.4, 370/95.2, 370/85.1, 370/85.2, 370/85.5, 370/9, 370/110.1, 370/13, 370/17, 340/825.50, 340/825.51
• US Class Current: 370/245
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 16/0315 using multiplexing techniques multiplexing for transmission of signals G08C15/00; multiplexing for electrical communication in general H04J
• CPC Class Codes: B60R 2016/0322 Temporary code for documents to be reclassified to G08C, H04L or H04Q

Abstract

A system for reporting the occurrence of a failure in a multiplex communication network system in which a plurality of communication nodes are connected to one another and information is exchanged by transceiving frames. In the system, if a failure takes place in any of the communication nodes, the frame which reports the failure occurrence is transmitted to the network while being given the top priority.

Claims

1. A multiplex communication system for use in a vehicle and having a plurality of communication nodes which are connected to a common multiplex transmission passage and arranged in such a manner that a frame is transceived between said communication nodes so as to exchange information for the purpose of controlling the operation of the vehicle, the system comprising:

arbitrating means for arbitrating the transmissions of said frames of the nodes in accordance with information about priority given to said frame in a normal operation;

detection means for detecting the occurrence of a failure in a certain communication node or the common multiplex transmission passage;

preparation means for preparing a failure report frame showing the detected failure occurrence while giving a higher priority to said frame than in the normal operation;

transmitting means for transmitting said failure report frame to said transmission passage; and

execution means provided for each of said communication nodes, said execution means performing a control corresponding to the failure after it has received said failure report frame transmitted by said transmitting means.

2. A system according to claim 1, wherein said arbitrating means, said detection means and said transmitting means are provided for each of said communication nodes, and said execution means for each of said communication nodes further comprises:

reception means for receiving a frame on the passage sent from the transmitting means of the other communication node; and

means for performing the control corresponding to the failure at the other node.

3. A system according to claim 1, wherein said failure report frame contains identification information denoting that said failure report frame is for reporting the failure occurrence.

4. A system according to claim 2, wherein said failure report frame contains identification information denoting that said failure report frame is a frame for reporting the failure occurrence.

5. A system according to claim 4, wherein said execution means of all of said communication nodes which have received said failure report frame containing said identification information perform the control corresponding to the failure.

6. A system according to claim 1, wherein said arbitrating means includes means for detecting a collision of said frames.

7. A system according to claim 6, wherein said arbitrating means acts in accordance with a CSMA/CD type arbitrating method.

8. A system according to claim 6, wherein said arbitrating means further includes means for setting a waiting time period to be the shortest time, said waiting time period being taken until said frame is re-transmitted if said detection means detects the collision of said frames.

9. A system according to claim 4, wherein said failure report frame has an information field for specifying any one of said communication nodes connected to said system as well as an information field showing whether or not a failure has occurred in any one of said communication nodes.

10. A system according to claim 1, wherein said execution means includes:

means for specifying said communication node, in which the failure has occurred, in accordance with said received frame; and

means for marking said specified communication node as being inoperative.

11. A system according to claim 10, wherein said execution means of each of said communication nodes has nominal value data prestored therein about information to be transmitted by the other communication node in a normal state whereby, when a certain communication node has been marked as being inoperative, said nominal value data is used if said information from said communication node which has been marked inoperative is necessary.